Would be a waste of a perfectly good match.
Would be a waste of a perfectly good match.
This is what I keep thinking.Never realized it took so few sales to make the top of NYT's bestsellers list. It speaks volumes about the book industry.
This is what I keep thinking.
Creating a children's book and buying copies in bulk to fake being a top seller than getting a movie deal out of it sounds like a good plan for any rich person looking to make money.
It's not "only" -- but the book sold ~115,000 copies according to NPD BookScan, which tracks physical US book sales. Books-A-Million is charging $23.09 for a hardcover copy, meaning the RNC bought roughly 4100 copies; a little less than half the number needed to hit the bestseller list in the NYT, and literally enough on its own to hit the WSJ's bestsellers, based on my own quick dirty googling.
It's a significant purchase. It's also paid for with donor money. It's shitty either way.
I doubt it can get you to #1 outright if that's all you sold, but it can make a difference. My guess is that there were more big bulk orders that weren't as easily tracked as this one though. I know Shea Serrano had around 15k preorders of his last book that debuted high in the charts if not number 1 and I suspect that represented a significant chunk of his first week of sales.What's the MSRP? $20? That's only 5000 books if so, 10,000 if the price is half. Does it really take that few to reach the top of the best selling list? (Plus whatever it organically sold, of course)
Sorta like Lex and Lionel from Smallville but both of them are dumb as fuckPiece of shit can't even profit off his daddy unless his daddy helps him lol
This is pretty standard for the conservative book industry, most of the time the books are bought up by rich conservatives and given away for free
Being a conservative author is basically welfare
If I'm following your numbers right, the RNC buy represents 4/115 or 3.5% of sales? So, maybe they were trying to guarantee a Best Seller, but it probably would've gotten there on it's own?
Which, yeah, I agree the RNC buy is a shitty grift. I said that. But it isn't the "only" reason the book hit the list.
If I'm following your numbers right, the RNC buy represents 4/115 or 3.5% of sales? So, maybe they were trying to guarantee a Best Seller, but it probably would've gotten there on it's own?
Which, yeah, I agree the RNC buy is a shitty grift. I said that. But it isn't the "only" reason the book hit the list.
It's the RNC wasting it, so I'll allow it
You're following right, but misinterpreted my point. I opened with the fact it's not the only reason, but my point is that if the book bombed naturally, their purchase *would* have been significant enough to likely land it on the list or just outside it. It was obviously not the only reason it did, but was significant insurance that it would.
"#1 best seller!"*Sorry but I'm lost - is the title seriously saying this book hit #1 based on just $100,000 sold? That seems like a rather small amount to top the bestsellers
It's the equivalent of being the number one album sold right now, you need a fraction of what was needed 20-30 years ago to make it to the top.What's the MSRP? $20? That's only 5000 books if so, 10,000 if the price is half. Does it really take that few to reach the top of the best selling list? (Plus whatever it organically sold, of course)