LOL
You can try, but it is an opinion piece and they don't have to be factual as long as they are labeled as such. There would be no conservative media without that protection.Can you sue over an op ed? Seems like their issue would be with the author, not the printer.
They don't actually care. This is about getting to brag to the base that they sued the NYT, the outcome is irrelevant.
This is the lawsuit game him and other powerful rich folk play whenever someone criticizes them. Bury them in bullshit libel suits to get them to shut up.
Trump campaign finally wised up and said "wait, why can't we just do this to the press too"
This is going to get laughed out of court. What moron told him the president could be libeled?
"I've gotten away with everything else, why not give it a shot?"This is going to get laughed out of court. What moron told him the president could be libeled?
Libel for an opinion piece marked as such? Come the fuck on.
How is the Trump campaign not embarrassed to expose their craven absurdity like this? Or are they implying that his base is stupid and sustained by a constant diet of red meat?
I don't understand why opinion pieces are printed in newspapers regardless....don't we literally buy newspapers to gather facts without opinion?
The suit has no standing, but still not sure the reasoning for opinion in a paper of facts.
Donald Trump frequently implies his base is stupid. They don't have to make him a prophet.I think they're pretty goddamned certain that his base is stupid and easily manipulated.
Just a profit.Donald Trump frequently implies his base is stupid. They don't have to make him a prophet.
Rememebr this the next time they want to have a Klan rally on a college campus
There are limitations on the first amendment but not the second apparently
I don't understand why opinion pieces are printed in newspapers regardless....don't we literally buy newspapers to gather facts without opinion?
The suit has no standing, but still not sure the reasoning for opinion in a paper of facts.
Sargent's June 13 column was titled "Trump just invited another Russian attack. Mitch McConnell is making one more likely." The lawsuit contends that it was defamatory because it contained a claim that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III concluded that the campaign "tried to conspire with" Russia in a "sweeping and systematic" attack during the 2016 election.
Waldman raised a similar issue in his column published June 20, writing, "Who knows what sort of aid Russia and North Korea will give to the Trump campaign, now that he has invited them to offer their assistance?" The campaign said that statement was false and defamatory because it is "not seeking Russia's or North Korea's help in the 2020 election."