• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

MrSaturn99

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,453
I live in a giant bucket.
Surprisingly Trump is not represented by Ty Beard.
XS5LK.gif
 

Deleted member 16657

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
10,198
Is this another "I'm under audit" meme where he bullshits that he can't talk about it because there's an ongoing lawsuit?
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,234
If this makes it to the SC, I'm fully confident that the lackeys in the bench will rule in his favor.
 
Oct 25, 2017
32,286
Atlanta GA
99.99999% chance it's a lie to swindle money from dumb old white people

give it like an hour or two and NYT will respond saying they've not seen any such filing
 

b-dubs

That's some catch, that catch-22
General Manager
Oct 25, 2017
32,721
This is going to get laughed out of court. What moron told him the president could be libeled?
 

_ifigured

Member
Oct 29, 2017
2,301
this dogshit fragility is going to cause more insane violent deplorables to rage at news outlets.
 

jeelybeans

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
Let's take it to the supreme court. 5 - 4. :) Let's further erode our institutions until it's full blown dictatorship.
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
LOL DISCOVERY


Does Trump not remember how many tapes, transcripts, witnesses and evidentiary elements there are?

If he doesn't submit to discovery, he loses the case.


If he does submit to discovery, he loses the case.


If he calls executive privilege, there is no case.
 

Tobor

Member
Oct 25, 2017
28,429
Richmond, VA
LOL DISCOVERY


Does Trump not remember how many tapes, transcripts, witnesses and evidentiary elements there are?

If he doesn't submit to discovery, he loses the case.


If he does submit to discovery, he loses the case.


If he calls executive privilege, there is no case.

They don't actually care. This is about getting to brag to the base that they sued the NYT, the outcome is irrelevant.
 

sangreal

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,890
This is a publicity stunt to show Trump fighting the "corrupt" media. It really shouldn't be signal boosted (since that's the goal) and half as many people will pay attention when it is dismissed in a few weeks
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
They don't actually care. This is about getting to brag to the base that they sued the NYT, the outcome is irrelevant.

Yeah but lawsuits have outcomes. There's a winner and a loser. He will have to drop the suit. Or lose the suit. Or get scolded for frivolous antics. There is a guaranteed negative outcome for Trump UNLESS the NYT for some reason decides to capitulate. Which they'd be INSANE to do.


And further, Trump is a public figure, a public servant and the NYT already enjoys tremendous First Amendment rights here.


NYT can ask for transcripts, tapes, witnesses, the content's of the National Enquirer Pecker safe - redacted elements from the Mulller probe and so on.


This is madness.
 

Tobor

Member
Oct 25, 2017
28,429
Richmond, VA
Yeah but lawsuits have outcomes. There's a winner and a loser. He will have to drop the suit. Or lose the suit. Or get scolded for frivolous antics. There is a guaranteed negative outcome for Trump UNLESS the NYT for some reason decides to capitulate. Which they'd be INSANE to do.


And further, Trump is a public figure, a public servant and the NYT already enjoys tremendous First Amendment rights here.


NYT can ask for transcripts, tapes, witnesses, the content's of the National Enquirer Pecker safe - redacted elements from the Mulller probe and so on.


This is madness.

They will almost assuredly drop it in the future. By then it won't matter, a fraction of the people they are trying to reach with this will ever know it was dropped.
 

b-dubs

That's some catch, that catch-22
General Manager
Oct 25, 2017
32,721
Wait, this is over an opinion piece? Let me laugh even harder
 

devilhawk

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,536
A few obvious outcomes:
1. It doesn't really proceed in court, even potentially never truly filed as it is just for the headlines today
2. It is dismissed for lacking merits or not submitting discovery, then Trump just rails about the deep state biased judges more
 

SirNinja

One Winged Slayer
Member
It's over an opinion article
lmao, of course. I can't even be surprised at this shit anymore.

Hopefully this suit backfires as hard as possible. Will probably just be dismissed, though. The whole point is for Trump to make a tweet saying "I just SUED the FAILING New York Times for their DISHONESTY!!1!". Red meat for his empty-headed followers, nothing more.
 

Deleted member 9305

Oct 26, 2017
4,064
Why not just shut down the whole paper? He got absolute power and all.
 
Oct 28, 2017
6,208
Libel for an opinion piece marked as such? Come the fuck on.

How is the Trump campaign not embarrassed to expose their craven absurdity like this? Or are they implying that his base is stupid and sustained by a constant diet of red meat?