100% it's recorded by the NSA or one of our alliesThis. My concern is that you literally can't prove or disprove what President Shitbag has been saying. So many of his conversations are behind closed doors.
100% it's recorded by the NSA or one of our alliesThis. My concern is that you literally can't prove or disprove what President Shitbag has been saying. So many of his conversations are behind closed doors.
This. My concern is that you literally can't prove or disprove what President Shitbag has been saying. So many of his conversations are behind closed doors.
Why would that be the case? Biden couched himself perfectly by saying if Trump doesnt do exactly as asked.its gonna make Biden look bad huh?
otherwise I see no reason for mr "Executive Privilege" to say or release anything as long as the senate will let him get away with murder.
Is that how you view the republicans that would immediately take over and further corruption? This seems like willful ignorance.People who want competent non corrupt people running the government?
Frankly, if Joe goes down too and Warren rises I will not be sad.
To be fair if this kills Biden while also making Trump guilty of some crime, I'll take both.
Already fucked. Do not underestimate the people issuing his orders. He IS effective. How else would he still be where he is despite constant breaking of the law, flaunting the rules, profiting from his position, and being a blathering shitbag.Could you imagine if this man were actually effective or competent. Think about how fucked we'd be in this scenario if he had the skillset of a politician.
Yes, this is what I've heard too. This will be another Barr summary moment and the media will happily fall for it. Good thing is we've still got a whistleblower out there.According to someone on MSNBC, calls like this aren't even properly transcripted? They're just cliffnotes and a summary?
Of course Trump was cool with offering this. He's gonna present a one and a half page summation, and as he's surrounded by yes men, they probably already knew to not note it down.
He's not.
>According to someone on MSNBC, calls like this aren't even properly transcripted? They're just cliffnotes and a summary?
Of course Trump was cool with offering this. He's gonna present a one and a half page summation, and as he's surrounded by yes men, they probably already knew to not note it down.
>We can unilaterally release phone calls with other foreign leaders? Curious to see what comes out, suspicion remains.
Transcription could mean anything.
The Dems have their own problems and Pelosi is under pressure from her own party members from the far left. This could blow up with nobody gaining from it.
The transcripts exonerate the president just like the mueller report exonerate the presidentReminder: GOP SPIN ALERT.
TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT IMPORTANT. THE WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE GIVEN OVER TO THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES. THE WHITE HOUSE BLOCKED THIS FROM HAPPENING.
No one wants to see the transcripts. They want to see the entire context of complaint that was found credible enough to send to Congress.
The TRANSCRIPTS will be nothing but trump code.
TOTALLY CLEARS THE PRESIDENT!! THANK YOU!The transcripts exonerate the president just like the mueller report exonerate the president
>
Mehdi Hasan @mehdirhasan
"a former deputy assistant secretary of defense..said not only would any so-called transcript be based on notes, but it would also likely be incomplete because the note-takers usually do not include issues that could be controversial if they became public" https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-transcript-idUSKBN1W935S …
6:56 AM - Sep 25, 2019
Kevin M. Kruse @KevinMKruse
Nixon released his own transcripts of the Oval Office tapes — which turned out to be wildly misleading. https://www.nytimes.com/1974/06/21/archives/nixon-and-house-versions-of-the-tapes-differ-widely-discrepancies.html …
2:27 PM - Sep 24, 2019
It'll be notes written by staffer / cultist. This is why the Dem oversight has been focused from the start on the full unredacted whistleblower report rather than the transcript. The whistle blower followed procedure and reported to the ICIG. The ICIG found the report, which involves a pattern of behaviour, to be "credible and urgent". But the impeachment inquiry isn't based on the contents of the report alone. It's a "package" of impeachable offenses.
>
Michael McFaul @McFaul
This is a big mistake -- terrible precedent, as no foreign leaders in future will speak candidly with the president on any future calls. Dont release Trump-Zelensky or Trump-Putin transcripts of calls. Instead, release whistleblower's complaint to Congress, as required by law. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1176559966024556544 …
2:26 PM - Sep 24, 2019
I don't get it. If it's required by law, how can the White House block it?Reminder: GOP SPIN ALERT.
TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT IMPORTANT. THE WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE GIVEN OVER TO THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES. THE WHITE HOUSE BLOCKED THIS FROM HAPPENING.
No one wants to see the transcripts. They want to see the entire context of complaint that was found credible enough to send to Congress.
The TRANSCRIPTS will be nothing but trump code.
I don't get it. If it's required by law, how can the White House block it?
The same way they've been blocking everything else.. by just outright not doing it and forcing it to go to the courts.I don't get it. If it's required by law, how can the White House block it?
I don't get it. If it's required by law, how can the White House block it?
Trump right about what?
How in the fuck or better yet, why in the fuck is he still going on national television? He's entirely the reason why this is happening.Guliani just admitted on the fox morning show that the transcript has 'been read to him'.
It would be so weird if nothing about Biden is in the "summary"/ "transcript"--that would just give credence to the claim that Trump hasn't done anything wrong... which would be fine for Trump et al. if his story hasn't already shifted so far into culpability.
So then what would be the impetus for the whistleblower's actions--that his complaint was just coincidence? Usually when facts don't add up, there's more to the story...
Climate change is Chinese hoax.
--Nobody on the left will believe the report or transcript are word-for-word true.
--Nobody on the right will question their authenticity, so long as the White House gives its approval of them.
The gridlock will continue because there is nobody that both sides will accept as a unbiased judge or arbitrator to examine or investigate anything. This was proven when Bob Mueller was attacked by Trump loyalists and when the GoP refused to protect his investigation.