I explained my point, it's up to you to explain how am I being a concern troll or a misogynist because I don't like generalizations. Besides what exactly are we discussing here? Tomi Lahren or the argument that men are trash?
"It's up to you to explain how I'm being a concern troll or a misogynist" says the poster who came into this thread swinging with the "Not All Men" hot take. It'd be funny if it weren't so godawful stale by now.
Do you understand that "Not All Men" is indeed considered a misogynistic and unwelcome interjection here? It's similar to folks concern trolling about "good cops" and "bad generalizations" whenever people post ACAB. You're not contributing anything of worth to the discussion, you're just distracting from it, in a fashion that indicates you're either acting with malicious intent or your ignorance is functionally indistinguishable from such.
It's not like I'm the first or only person here who balked at your statements and identified them as unwelcome. It shouldn't be surprising that your Not All Men nonsense provoked a response like "Oh wow Era. We have our very own MRAs." So like, maybe don't post shit that an MRA would say?
Then you accuse us of being fooled by grifters, which...again, concern trolling, because there's no realistic reason to think any such thing is happening ITT. This post put it much better:
There's nobody on here at risk of being converted by her fantastic arguments because the membership here is pretty self-selecting. There's nobody who's gonna tune into her shit next week or give her ratings in case she says something vaguely progressive again.
Here, how about this -- it's up to you to explain how your behavior should be distinguished from trolling if you don't think it's an accurate descriptor.