Freakazoid is so absolutely perfect for a modern-day revival. IMO, it was the funniest of the Spielberg/WB cartoons.Animaniacs and Tiny Toons revivals, this means Freakazoid has a chance right?
Freakazoid is so absolutely perfect for a modern-day revival. IMO, it was the funniest of the Spielberg/WB cartoons.Animaniacs and Tiny Toons revivals, this means Freakazoid has a chance right?
That would be the monkey paw effect to whoever asked for all of their youth toons revived.
You clearly missed a lot of the adult jokes in the originals at 9 years old. I imagine it'll be like it's always been: funny slapstick for the kiddos with the pop culture and adult jokes that the kiddos don't even register.Are these revivals aimed at kids or the adults who were kids when they were on the air.
I loved this show as a kid, loved the video game too... but I was ~9.
My hope is kids' shows get revived and made for kids, instead of going too much wink-nod to us nostalgia-addicted millennials.
Freakazoid is so absolutely perfect for a modern-day revival. IMO, it was the funniest of the Spielberg/WB cartoons.
I don't think you can do freakazoid in 2020.
Freakazoid was lightning ina bottle in the 90's. It was filled with references and gags that people under 60 shouldn't have understood. There was a fucking f-troop joke. AN F-TROOP JOKE!
The entire first episode is a giant reference to one of the worst movies of all time, "the crawling eye".
That level of reverence, and still making it work...is nearly impossible.
Yes, though the last time the show was seen on TV about a decade ago it was included, and the episode is up on Hulu. Fox and Nickelodeon never aired it though.
The current Bugs Bunny wears yellow gloves, as seen in a couple of his first cartoons from the early 40sNo white gloves on Buster Bunny. I guess they're addressing the problematic "minstrel show" aspect of 1930's animated characters? Have they done this with their other characters like Bugs Bunny?
edit: for context original design
I find it interesting Buster seems to be the only character with the gloves in the original from what I can tell.
Yes, though the last time the show was seen on TV about a decade ago it was included, and the episode is up on Hulu. Fox and Nickelodeon never aired it though.
Disney announced last week that they're working on a live-action movie (not an episodic show) for Disney+. It was in development hell for a while.And now can I also hope for a new Rescue Rangers show or am I pushing my luck?
Seriously, the Plucky/Hamton duo was my personal fave of the show. It won't be the same without them.Bigger question is; who's succeeding Joe Alaskey and Don Messick as Plucky and Hamton? :(
Don't forget the Daria spinoff (or is it a revival?) and Clone High coming back. 00s is getting revived too!Between this, Animaniacs and Ducktales (fingers crossed on a Darkwing Duck spinoff like everyone is hoping for) the 90's animation revival is in full swing and I am loving it so far.
Honestly, an internet-empowered superhero who's main schtick was random humor and pop-culture references was incredibly prescient for a mid-90s cartoon.I mean, it's about an internet superhero
the jokes write themselves
streamlining characters, like the Animaniacs reboot. Question is, who else gets cut?
streamlining characters, like the Animaniacs reboot. Question is, who else gets cut?