.
.
I have a very good fucking reason to want those responsible fired.
About the firing, THQ Nordic is based in the EU and afaik you can't fire someone like you do in the US.
There are laws and obligations, this is not an easy and fast thing to do.
There's probably a lot of employment law in the way that prevents instantly firing people over this kind of stuff. Hold your horses on critting them for no firings.
The witch-hunt continues.
Why do you want to find the people who did this and publicly humiliate them so badly ? None of you knows the details yet you act like you know exactly what THQ should do. Maybe it was a legitimate mistake. You're filled with resentment for people you know nothing about.
All of this is kinda ironic for a "redemption" website
it's very important to me that all of the people who either dismissed this as not being an issue or said that this won't stop them from purchasing their games reads this postI have a very good fucking reason to want those responsible fired.
it's very important to me that all of the people who either dismissed this as not being an issue or said that this won't stop them from purchasing their games reads this post
booooI read the post, didn't dismiss it at all, but I don't understand this compulsion some people here have with dictating other people's choices and judging them if they don't exactly align exactly with theirs especially those who spoke out about THQs behavior and failures in this instance.
The witch-hunt continues.
Why do you want to find the people who did this and publicly humiliate them so badly ? None of you knows the details yet you act like you know exactly what THQ should do. Maybe it was a legitimate mistake. You're filled with resentment for people you know nothing about.
All of this is kinda ironic for a "redemption" website
At least the guy that actually did answer the questions should get the boot.
At least the guy that actually did answer the questions should get the boot.
Some of those answers he gave were really not ok..
Isn't that kinda just like posting on Twitter? /sUtterly feeble.
No discussion of how it actually came to happen.
No mention of consequences for those responsible.
No acknowledgement that they actively engaged with people discussing "unethical content".
THQNordic like.It's mindblowing that apparently a "mistake" this grievous resulted in everybody involved still keeping their jobs.
Makes the whole we sorry thing really worthless and fake.
Yeah. It is not just the fact that they did the ama, but how it went down.It's mindblowing that apparently a "mistake" this grievous resulted in everybody involved still keeping their jobs.
Makes the whole we sorry thing really worthless and fake.
This isn't about dictating every choice someone makes, it's about enabling a company who directly linked to and participated with a website known for abuse and pedophilia. It's not that deepI read the post, didn't dismiss it at all, but I don't understand this compulsion some people here have with dictating other people's choices and judging them if they don't exactly align exactly with theirs especially those who spoke out about THQs behavior and failures in this instance.
This isn't about dictating every choice someone makes, it's about enabling a company who directly linked to and participated with a website known for abuse and pedophilia. It's not that deep
I'll repeat what people have said because so many seem to not understand, but firing someone in EU can take weeks, especially for something like this or where there's dispute as to who actually is to blame.
It likely has to go through HR, disciplinary hearings etc. Sometimes you have to have a verbal, then written then final warning.
I imagine the persons involved have been suspended while everything is put in place but the intention is there to fire them.
Employment law here exists to protect people, but it also makes it hard to get rid of shit employees.
The problem is they've yet to handle any of this correctly, so why should anyone back down on the pressure?This so much. People here are so used to the US way of things where people can be fired in an instance without cause, so it is super easy to get rid of someone immediately when they mess up to the nth degree like the folks at THQ Nordic. But this could take weeks in the EU to get resolved, the parent company could still be doing the right thing, it is just going to take time and as part of the process they aren't allowed to immediately say they are firing someone.
The problem is they've yet to handle any of this correctly, so why should anyone back down on the pressure?
Honestly not sure why they want to still work there. They screwed up and know that everyone will be on their ass (hopefully). They should just quit.Yeah it has been said multiple times already but people don't seem to understand. The laws in EU make it very difficult to fire someone, especially if what they have done is not a breach of contract directly.
There are things that point towards Phil having been suspended. I have a feeling THQ lawyers are currently working on finding a way to fire the individuals involved but that will not be made public until any termination is firmly in place.
I want to see heads roll. I mean, I'm not a fan of THQ's portfolio but I'll be damned if I give them a cent.it's very important to me that all of the people who either dismissed this as not being an issue or said that this won't stop them from purchasing their games reads this post
Counterproductive to what? This is a very easy moral standpoint to take, we aren't talking about questionable business tactics or off-colour humour, we're talking about a site dedicated to hate and abuse. If you can't take a stand against that you *deserve* to be chastised, letting people just say "yeah well I don't care, I want to play Darksiders" is not a valid response to thisYou do whatever you have to morally, ethically but chastizing others because they don't fall in step seems... counterproductive.
And when they do then they deserve the credit for that. Not until then.It will just take time for them to thoroughly investigate the issue and then take the appropriate action.
I'm sure everyone would like for ALL involved to face repercussion not just one or two scapegoats, and also implement procedures so this kind of thing doesn't happen again.
It'll take time but they should get there in the end.
Guess they'll have to somehow downplay what the site is for investors and partners and such who legit don't know. Better leave the people who don't care in the dark on this.It amazes me that they still label the site as "controversial "
Really shows how much they know what's really going on.
Yeah. And the fact that people are just accepting this kind of language is very frustratingIt amazes me that they still label the site as "controversial "
Really shows how much they know what's really going on.
And when they do then they deserve the credit for that. Not until then.
If it's as thorough as their investigation as to where they're giving AMAs, then it should already be done.I would rather they conduct a thorough investigation instead of rush to get "credit".
Where did I say anything about how quickly it happens? They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt until we know they're doing anything. So coming in here saying hey I'm sure they're doing something is meaningless. Until they actually do that's just wishful thinkingI would rather they conduct a thorough investigation instead of rush to get "credit".
If it's as thorough as their investigation as to where they're giving AMAs, then it should already be done.
See in OP:Where did I say anything about how quickly it happens? They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt until we know they're doing anything. So coming in here saying hey I'm sure they're doing something is meaningless. Until they actually do that's just wishful thinking
As Co-Founder and Group CEO of THQ Nordic AB, I take full responsibility for all of THQ Nordic GmbH's actions and communications. I have spent the past several days conducting an internal investigation into this matter. I assure you that every member of the organization has learned from this past week's events. I take this matter very seriously and we will take appropriate action to make sure we have the right policies and systems in place to avoid similar mistakes in the future.
Sure. But considering their original statement was "We already said something on Twitter," I'm not really holding my breath that this is anything but damage minimization.I think it would be an investigation as to how this could get approved, through how many channels, what those channels consist of and how they can improve so ensure it doesn't happen again. We all want justice but it just takes time.
i don't understand why pressuring them from all angles until then is a bad thing? they do not deserve the benefit of the doubt.I think it would be an investigation as to how this could get approved, through how many channels, what those channels consist of and how they can improve so ensure it doesn't happen again. We all want justice but it just takes time.
do you guys not understand the situation? this wasn't a goof, it was intentional. you don't accidentally do an AMA on 8 fucking chanMaybe they could educate those responsible as to why this was such a bad idea and why it was wrong instead of just firing them and getting on with it.
can we stop calling this "a mess up"
a mess up is when i forget to rinse the shampoo out of my hair, which i've been doing more and more recently.
do you guys not understand the situation? this wasn't a goof, it was intentional. you don't accidentally do an AMA on 8 fucking chan
No need to throw the baby out with the bath water now, there is still money to be made. Just go with safe terms like "controversial" or "harboring alternate viewpoints" and leave enough grey area in your wording so that you don't piss off any potential customers.It amazes me that they still label the site as "controversial "
Really shows how much they know what's really going on.
Yup, exactly.Utterly feeble.
No discussion of how it actually came to happen.
No mention of consequences for those responsible.
No acknowledgement that they actively engaged with people discussing "unethical content".