it's childish to boycott a company for associating with pedophiles and nazis. save that energy for when they don't port a game to the switch
Or those fucking microtransactions
it's childish to boycott a company for associating with pedophiles and nazis. save that energy for when they don't port a game to the switch
Oh of course, and that's definitely disgusting. But I don't see how a boycott would help if they fire that PR guy (which I think they should do).
You're a Detective. Do some detective work and maybe you'll see WHY people are NOT happy about this for freaking sake.50 pages, come on, I think this is a massive overreaction, guys. I understand that 8chan is a shithole and this was the stupidest idea ever, but these are still people with a limited perspective of what's going on in the gaming community and on the internet. It is the job of the PR and Marketing Director to prevent these kinds of disasters, so I think it is appropriate to fire him, but I can't really blame Reinhard Pollice for his participation. Doing AMAs isn't why he was hired, and he was only answering questions in relation to actual development and M&A.
Of course they need to focus on damage control now, and not make stupid mistakes like these in the future, but I think it's very childish to boycott a company because of the decision of one person within a company of literally a thousand people. If that one person wasn't there, they wouldn't have had this disaster, so if they'll fire him, they have done everything they can do about this situation, and can't do anything but try to prevent it in the future. A boycott doesn't help if it isn't to change a strategical point of view, such as certain monetisation methods, developing multiple games exclusively for certain platforms, etc. This was the decision of just one guy. If he's gone from the company, what is your boycott even useful for?
You're still going trying to tone police how people should react to a company associating with and straight up linking to a website that hosts child porn, doxxing, hate speech, white supremacy, and a whole lot of other shit?
I love how you wrote two damn paragraphs to tell people they should stop being mean to a company who willingly associated with a site filled with child porn and hate speech. Shows what your priorities in life are at least.50 pages, come on, I think this is a massive overreaction, guys. I understand that 8chan is a shithole and this was the stupidest idea ever, but these are still people with a limited perspective of what's going on in the gaming community and on the internet. It is the job of the PR and Marketing Director to prevent these kinds of disasters, so I think it is appropriate to fire him, but I can't really blame Reinhard Pollice for his participation. Doing AMAs isn't why he was hired, and he was only answering questions in relation to actual development and M&A.
Of course they need to focus on damage control now, and not make stupid mistakes like these in the future, but I think it's very childish to boycott a company because of the decision of one person within a company of literally a thousand people. If that one person wasn't there, they wouldn't have had this disaster, so if they'll fire him, they have done everything they can do about this situation, and can't do anything but try to prevent it in the future. A boycott doesn't help if it isn't to change a strategical point of view, such as certain monetisation methods, developing multiple games exclusively for certain platforms, etc. This was the decision of just one guy. If he's gone from the company, what is your boycott even useful for?
Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
Why do you care so much that people don't buy a game that financially benefits a company they don't like? Calling people childish, fuck off with that nonsense.50 pages, come on, I think this is a massive overreaction, guys. I understand that 8chan is a shithole and this was the stupidest idea ever, but these are still people with a limited perspective of what's going on in the gaming community and on the internet. It is the job of the PR and Marketing Director to prevent these kinds of disasters, so I think it is appropriate to fire him, but I can't really blame Reinhard Pollice for his participation. Doing AMAs isn't why he was hired, and he was only answering questions in relation to actual development and M&A.
Of course they need to focus on damage control now, and not make stupid mistakes like these in the future, but I think it's very childish to boycott a company because of the decision of one person within a company of literally a thousand people. If that one person wasn't there, they wouldn't have had this disaster, so if they'll fire him, they have done everything they can do about this situation, and can't do anything but try to prevent it in the future. A boycott doesn't help if it isn't to change a strategical point of view, such as certain monetisation methods, developing multiple games exclusively for certain platforms, etc. This was the decision of just one guy. If he's gone from the company, what is your boycott even useful for?
Oh of course, and that's definitely disgusting. But I don't see how a boycott would help if they fire that PR guy (which I think they should do).
Well, now they do.
We've seen contracts lost for less.
Heck MSFT and Ori's dev haven't even made the partnership official so there's plenty of time for them to put a bow on it.
Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
Did you see all the posts pointing out that multiple people at the company harbor horrible views yet?Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
That's why they're here.
They are actively engaging with a website that facilitates child pornography. If that's not controversial to you then what is?
Same boat. It was one of the few games I had put off from last year that I was genuinely looking forward to.
50 pages, come on, I think this is a massive overreaction, guys. I understand that 8chan is a shithole and this was the stupidest idea ever, but these are still people with a limited perspective of what's going on in the gaming community and on the internet. It is the job of the PR and Marketing Director to prevent these kinds of disasters, so I think it is appropriate to fire him, but I can't really blame Reinhard Pollice for his participation. Doing AMAs isn't why he was hired, and he was only answering questions in relation to actual development and M&A.
Of course they need to focus on damage control now, and not make stupid mistakes like these in the future, but I think it's very childish to boycott a company because of the decision of one person within a company of literally a thousand people. If that one person wasn't there, they wouldn't have had this disaster, so if they'll fire him, they have done everything they can do about this situation, and can't do anything but try to prevent it in the future. A boycott doesn't help if it isn't to change a strategical point of view, such as certain monetisation methods, developing multiple games exclusively for certain platforms, etc. This was the decision of just one guy. If he's gone from the company, what is your boycott even useful for?
Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
50 pages, come on, I think this is a massive overreaction, guys. I understand that 8chan is a shithole and this was the stupidest idea ever, but these are still people with a limited perspective of what's going on in the gaming community and on the internet. It is the job of the PR and Marketing Director to prevent these kinds of disasters, so I think it is appropriate to fire him, but I can't really blame Reinhard Pollice for his participation. Doing AMAs isn't why he was hired, and he was only answering questions in relation to actual development and M&A.
Of course they need to focus on damage control now, and not make stupid mistakes like these in the future, but I think it's very childish to boycott a company because of the decision of one person within a company of literally a thousand people. If that one person wasn't there, they wouldn't have had this disaster, so if they'll fire him, they have done everything they can do about this situation, and can't do anything but try to prevent it in the future. A boycott doesn't help if it isn't to change a strategical point of view, such as certain monetisation methods, developing multiple games exclusively for certain platforms, etc. This was the decision of just one guy. If he's gone from the company, what is your boycott even useful for?
yepSo your point is you don't see the point of people complaining and so you're complaining about it.
Is that really the most appropriate answer to that?How can one even be a huge fan of Darksiders? It's a mediocre series at best.
8chan is not the hill to die on.50 pages, come on, I think this is a massive overreaction, guys. I understand that 8chan is a shithole and this was the stupidest idea ever, but these are still people with a limited perspective of what's going on in the gaming community and on the internet. It is the job of the PR and Marketing Director to prevent these kinds of disasters, so I think it is appropriate to fire him, but I can't really blame Reinhard Pollice for his participation. Doing AMAs isn't why he was hired, and he was only answering questions in relation to actual development and M&A.
Of course they need to focus on damage control now, and not make stupid mistakes like these in the future, but I think it's very childish to boycott a company because of the decision of one person within a company of literally a thousand people. If that one person wasn't there, they wouldn't have had this disaster, so if they'll fire him, they have done everything they can do about this situation, and can't do anything but try to prevent it in the future. A boycott doesn't help if it isn't to change a strategical point of view, such as certain monetisation methods, developing multiple games exclusively for certain platforms, etc. This was the decision of just one guy. If he's gone from the company, what is your boycott even useful for?
So fucking what? Why would you want to just come rushing in here and defend a publisher?Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
I(now regretfully) decided to actually look at that thread. Who the fuck do they think they're fooling by saying they had no idea about the site and condone child pornography? Beyond the previous mentioned comment on the "big tittie lolis" post, there's a picture of an effectively nude prepubescent girl in one of the first replys and one of the THQN people was having a waifu coversation about the underage NGE characters.
Obviously more of a jokey comment, but they very clearly knew what they were doing.
Dear God, I swear you'll get apologists for anything. Gaming side was a fucking mistake.I'd like to consider myself internet savy and didn't know 8chan was that bad, I simply knew it as the 4chan where anyone could make a board. I think MOST people dont realize that 8chan is that shitty (probably on it's fringes) and if I'm reading right they came to THQ asking for the AMA, so it's not quite like they chose the website specifically.
Though of course I understand the feeling that companies and PR should be held to a certain standard and should have looked into it further. But it's not like they defended the website at all, I think they gave a pretty satisfactory apology for the situation. If I'm going to join in on cancel culture I'd at least like there to be a more easy decision to make than doing it because of some PR mishap with some naive or stupid individuals. But I wont judge how much others can take offense to something, I just kind of expected to be more infuriated than I ended up being. Just disappointed.
And you care about that why again?Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
I'd like to consider myself internet savy and didn't know 8chan was that bad, I simply knew it as the 4chan where anyone could make a board. I think MOST people dont realize that 8chan is that shitty (probably on it's fringes) and if I'm reading right they came to THQ asking for the AMA, so it's not quite like they chose the website specifically.
Though of course I understand the feeling that companies and PR should be held to a certain standard and should have looked into it further. But it's not like they defended the website at all, I think they gave a pretty satisfactory apology for the situation. If I'm going to join in on cancel culture I'd at least like there to be a more easy decision to make than doing it because of some PR mishap with some naive or stupid individuals. But I wont judge how much others can take offense to something, I just kind of expected to be more infuriated than I ended up being. Just disappointed.
Oh of course, and that's definitely disgusting. But I don't see how a boycott would help if they fire that PR guy (which I think they should do).
They have a history of similar behavior on the website that shows that they know what kind of website it is.I'd like to consider myself internet savy and didn't know 8chan was that bad, I simply knew it as the 4chan where anyone could make a board. I think MOST people dont realize that 8chan is that shitty (probably on it's fringes) and if I'm reading right they came to THQ asking for the AMA, so it's not quite like they chose the website specifically.
Though of course I understand the feeling that companies and PR should be held to a certain standard and should have looked into it further. But it's not like they defended the website at all, I think they gave a pretty satisfactory apology for the situation. If I'm going to join in on cancel culture I'd at least like there to be a more easy decision to make than doing it because of some PR mishap with some naive or stupid individuals. But I wont judge how much others can take offense to something, I just kind of expected to be more infuriated than I ended up being. Just disappointed.
Because it's something we hear every other week, and I don't know how many people actually enforce the boycotts they announce on the internet, but I don't see what's the point.
The backlash could easily cause them to lose the Microsoft and Nickelodeon deals. Actual boycotting is just for personal reasons. The former is what kills the company.Oh of course, and that's definitely disgusting. But I don't see how a boycott would help if they fire that PR guy (which I think they should do).
I'm certainly not going to defend anybody, but keep in mind they're located in Vienna/Austria and it must have been between 8 and 9 pm local time when the AMA started. Not a whole lot of people in the office around that time, I'd assume. Still baffled by this whole thing though.I would give the employee the benefit of the doubt if he was duped into doing this shit but the fact that the company didn't stop this from happening is very telling.