You would be there because your visual and auditory systems would be engaged with them, if you headphones pick up background noise.
So Occulus Quest is cheap, most people do not get motion sickness, has great non gimmicky games, fits comfortable and isnt uncomfortable to wear with great audio?
Ok first off you need to stop accusing people of lying when you misunderstand them. You can have an AR app take place in an entire city, and you can walk around like a normal human, meaning you're not relegated to a little VR room. If it's like your example, that is AR, not VR.
That's not true unless everyone has their own AR device. Alex Kipman talked about this before, about how his wife felt disconnected from him using HoloLens. Quite literally you have the HoloLens project lead disagreeing with you.
Because you keep fucking handwaving people's issues away like they don't matter cause it's not an actual issue. Enjoy your cult
You do realize AR is also on phones, tablets, and laptops and not just headsets right? That was my point.
That's exactly how usage of consoles, PCs, and smartphones were like in the early days. People aren't using VR that often? Total shocker. Or it would be if I didn't already know the obvious and expectation of any fledgling technology.
Yes, however that's a stop-gap. Glasses AR is meant to outright replace mobile AR.
Another thing that won't happen any time soon. No one will opt for wearables unless they're extremely mainstream.
Fair enough. I just wanted to point out that AR and VR HMDs have that same issue there.
Find me people using PCs often in the 70s. Many people back then thought the main use was to store recipes on them.
I agree, honestly I wasn't even thinking of HMDs cause I see one of ARs advantages being that you don't need one to enjoy it.
Ehhh this is shaky reasoning because lots of things people don't use consistently also just don't catch on.
Sigh.
I never said there are no issues. I even literally stated there are issues in the simpleist way one could, and given the overall positive consensus from those that have tried VR, few people that have tried high-end headsets see it as a gimmick.
You keep reverting back to 2016, Now your at gimmick levels.
Oh wow an article about the future! I literally said a gimmick at the moment. Maybe you need to learn to reading comprehension again
Then VR is for you! Cause in the future it's all possible and more!
Since you are in the future how is it being with your VR girlfriend? Does she make your haptic body suit tingle?
I actually really like augmented reality because it still allows you to see the world around you, I kinda feel like VR should've been a bridge between normal displays and AR but it seems they've all developed their own markets so there is room for all however I prolly won't get into VR until all the equipment is wire free and very light.
You've been a prick since you entered this coversation and you know it
Have you seen Apples latest glasses, They'll be the first to break out i think. They already utilise ARKit 3 in many features today, Eye tracking patents.
Sounds like you have a rare view. I get your take on RE7 because it shows it's low resolution, but Thumper is quite crisp in VR. Not 1080p crisp, but nothing that I've ever seen someone complain about. If you still need more pixels there, then a HP Reverb would likely satisfy anyone's standards for Thumper.
Their fates are pretty closely tied together though, and since VR has a lot of general use for consumers and enterprise alike, it only seems likely that it will be hugely mainstream at some point.
Not true for me glasses fog up, eyelashes brush the lenses with oil etc. I need Lasik and VR will probably be the reason i finally got pushed over the edge.
Doubtful, its application isnt for the gaming mainstream. Education perhaps.
Consumers can use it for telepresence, socialization, media consumption and computing, entertainment, art expression, and more. It has more uses than any device we use today, so that's a pretty good advantage for it's adoption rate.
