sonic movie 2 spoilers
Actually that's the silly part, he didn't win against Archie, they settled out of court (which means no judgement actually occurred). The lawsuit was perfectly capable of continuing without the original contract, it may have hurt Archie's position but it didn't invalidate it.lol if he thinks he won't be crushed by Paramount. Dude only won against Archie because they lost the contracts.
And we all know that what Penders says isn't necessarily the truth. Like how he totally owned the rights to Shade the Echidna from Chronicles because of the alleged similarities to his own character, even though Sega now has recently published a Sonic Encyclopedia featuring her with no legal credit to Penders. I'm sure he'll be taking Sega to court any day now. Definitely.Actually that's the silly part, he didn't win against Archie, they settled out of court (which means no judgement actually occurred). The lawsuit was perfectly capable of continuing without the original contract, it may have hurt Archie's position but it didn't invalidate it.
Reasonable speculation is what seemed to have happened is it was right about that time Archie realised it was going to be a long lawsuit from then on, and they were already in financial trouble. Thus deciding to settle out of court, which of note the terms of the settlement have never been publicly disclosed, and Penders always curiously looks for a reason to avoid the subject.
Further notes; Scott Fulop tried the same thing and failed, and Penders failed to present his lawsuit against Bioware for Sonic Chronicles (it got dismissed 2 or 3 times). His foundation is nothing but sand.
This is a thread I'd hoped would've never been bumped again...