The Emmet Till bill was blocked just this year! Rand Paul blocked it from unanimous consent, and though it cleared the House easily, four Republicans voted against it.That's no surprise at all. Klan had tons of power. So much that presidents couldn't criticize lynchings because they needed their support.
As a matter of fact till this day no Anti Lynching law has been able to be passed through the Senate.
The way the KKK exploded in the 1920s is a fascinating story. It was basically just a money making venture due to the $10 membership fee.
They used white men's fear over a changing world in order to make money off them. Imagine that...
I have bad news about FDR. The New Deal was progressive as fuck for white people.
There is a reason minimum wage didn't apply to crop pickers and waiters. The New Deal set the stage for the massive boom in economic inequality between BIPOC and white Americans. Some argue FDR needed racist Southern Dem votes and that's why he did it, but he sold non-whites down the river to get the New Deal passed.
i mean, FDR was responsible for the Japanese internment camps. Not sure why people hold him to this holy grail of progressivism when his race record was not good by any means.I have bad news about FDR. The New Deal was progressive as fuck for white people.
There is a reason minimum wage didn't apply to crop pickers and waiters. The New Deal set the stage for the massive boom in economic inequality between BIPOC and white Americans. Some argue FDR needed racist Southern Dem votes and that's why he did it, but he sold non-whites down the river to get the New Deal passed.
Harding was never a member of the KKK.
The KKK spread the message that Harding was a member to booster membership, but most historians do not think he was a member and there's no evidence that he was, despite the KKK spreading that message. While the KKK was arguably the third most powerful political organization in 1924, it would have been unusual for a northern republican to be in the KKK.
But more to the point, dozens or hundreds of american politicians, even federal congressmen, belonged to the KKK and it was not a fringe organization in the 1920s. It was mainstream.
Ohio had a massive KKK population too. We had more up here in the midwest than any Southern state. That shit was pretty mainstream at one time.An estimated 30% of all white men were in the Indiana Klan in that time period.Indiana Klan - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
In Dayton, 15 to 20 percent of the population in the 1920s was believed to be a member of the KKK. Rallies at the former Montgomery County Fairgrounds regularly drew 10,000+ people.
I was gonna make a joke about Trump being in it, but we all know he'd refuse to wear the hood and hide his face.
Wait till you learn that America's eugenics infrastructure was so well-developed and nationally accepted that the Nazis used it, along with Jim Crow laws, as a blueprint for their own genocidal infrastructure.One of my university modules this year is on US history from 1900-2000, and the lecture this week is on the 1920s. Not being American and having only a surface level knowledge of these things, I'd assumed the KKK was some lunatic fringe racist organisation, which it is. But I was surprised to be told that president harding was a member, its membership was more than 5 million by 1924. Like, what? I know overt racism was and is still popular everywhere, but that I had no idea of that. I don't know much about this harding guy but he must have been real awful.
I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm just saying that he would refuse to wear the hood and hide his face. He's too much of an egomaniac for that. He'll just continue being a racist piece of shit without the hood.Donald Trump is a convicted segregationist: https://www.npr.org/2016/09/29/4959...ed-by-decades-old-housing-discrimination-case
I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm just saying that he would refuse to wear the hood and hide his face. He's too much of an egomaniac for that. He'll just continue being a racist piece of shit without the hood.
Looking at the module content, we don't go that far into it.Wait till you learn that America's eugenics infrastructure was so well-developed and nationally accepted that the Nazis used it, along with Jim Crow laws, as a blueprint for their own genocidal infrastructure.
It is the onion of American social problems. There's layers to it. Way, way too many layers, and removing most of them and planting what's left usually allows it to sprout.Racism in America is always exponentially worse than what you think it is.
The Nazi party in America and the UK is taught in British education, I already knew that, but the KKK is never mentioned, even when I did US history in the 1960s and the civil liberties movement as a teenager.
Well it wasnt when I did it, which was 2009 odd.The KKK was in british secondary school textbooks when american history of that era was part of the curriculum in the mid nineties. I remember because it said the KKK mysteriously collapsed (from its time of super high popularity) and I wondered at the time what caused it, and then about 10 years ago I read a book called the History of the FBI which said that LBJ ordered J Edgar Hoover to get rid of them.
Same as LBJ, who did many great things during his time in office but also put us in Vietnam.i mean, FDR was responsible for the Japanese internment camps. Not sure why people hold him to this holy grail of progressivism when his race record was not good by any means.
Possibly I'm forgetting it, but I'm sure it never came up.That's really odd. Was a big part of the 60s bit when I was doing it. Seems like a massive omission
Wilson loved this movie so much, he screened it at the White House.
Sounds like this isn't true for Harding: https://www.hardinghome.org/fact-vs-fiction/
Now they have the 14 words instead.Last week's lecture was on Wilson, but it didn't cover his attitude to race at all, just the 14 points, his political ideals, were they idealist or pragmatic, the First World War.
I'll ask someone else I took the class with, see if I just forgot it. Would be a strange omission.I just had a look around and I still have the book! I was wrong on where it focuses though, there were 3 pages on the kkk for the 20s section, and then it's mentioned a fair bit for 60s. Was written specifically for the GCSE syllabus back then.
Few Americans know it, but in fact Richard Nixon, even more than John Kennedy or Lyndon Johnson, shaped the civil-rights landscape we inhabit today. Nixon broke the will of the South, making school desegregation, long on the books but largely unimplemented, a reality for millions of children black and white. He presided over the nationalization of the Voting Rights Act, extending it beyond the South to cover all Americans—including Latinos. He oversaw the birth of bilingual education and averted the death of historically black colleges. Most important, for better or worse, he and his aides created affirmative action as we know it, turning a vague idea about a leg up at the starting gate into a vast national web of "goals and timetables" at colleges, corporations, and government contracting agencies.
The thirty-seventh President may or may not have seen black people as the equals of whites—he probably didn't, according to Kotlowski. But the scrappy contender in him was as strong as, if not stronger than, the bigot, and he was deeply committed to equal opportunity. Of course, like all his beliefs, this impulse was tempered by political calculation: Nixon never did anything without considering how it would look to voters, particularly the southern and white-ethnic voters who increasingly formed the core of the Republican Party. But politic or not, Kotlowski says, Nixon's sympathy for the struggling outsider drove him to try to level the playing field—even when that meant helping blacks at the expense of whites.
In the end, then, the story of Nixon and race is, like so much else in Nixon's history, a tragic story. He meant well—much better than most people, then or now, have given him credit for. His iconoclastic ideas were sometimes brilliant and far ahead of their time. But ultimately it's hard to count his civil-rights policy a success. Yes, he transformed the way we see the problem: the economic, results-oriented approach he fashioned reigns supreme even today. But the endless preferences it engendered were hardly true to his principles—and arguably have undermined racial progress. Finally, it's no accident that most readers will be surprised by the news in this volume. Whatever Nixon accomplished in behalf of blacks, he had no idea how to communicate his vision or use the bully pulpit for moral leadership on race issues.
A tough policy can also be a compassionate one. When I visited the Daytop Village drug rehabilitation center in Swan Lake, N.Y., in 1988, I met scores of young people who had fallen into the drug trap. With guidance from Msgr. William B. O'Brien and his dedicated colleagues, they were now on the road to productive, drug-free lives. Daytop offers 24-hour-a-day supervision, stiff punishments for patients who stray, and regular follow-up testing after they go home.
Because many such programs rely solely on private donations, only a fraction of those who need them can get in. No matter what else President Bush does, he should make it a national goal to ensure that no one who really wants to beat drugs is ever excluded from treatment. Any American who saw the hopeful faces of the young people at Daytop Village would gladly open his heart and his checkbook if it meant saving even one more child from oblivion.
I mean, if you're trying to usurp power from the Solid South, it's a strategy. A dark, cynical, evil strategy, but a strategy. Only a jackass would try that strategy to break the Solid South.
"Solid south" as political lexicon is about 40 years after Harding's time, and the idea of Republicans usurping that would not be a political plan until the 1960s and Nixon. Harding, for his faults and he was certainly a racist, was not a KKK member as a matter of simple fact. Harding was a terrible president, much worse than Hoover, but he wasn't a member of the KKK. And moreover he didn't win the south.
In the 1920 election Cox carries every Southern state (minus Tennessee) and Harding carried the rest of the country. He didn't try to win Southern Democratic votes.
Well of course I was aware. But I hadn't studied it before, even at a surface level.I don't know if you know this, but America has a small history of being super fucking racist.