Even though I still prefer playing the Sims 3, the gender options and representation is top notch in Sims 4 and EA/Maxis really deserve every bit of praise for it.
its never happening :(
Nobody is saying it means nothing, but lesbians being vastly more marketable and tolerable for higher ups is a known factor and one that permeates pretty much all media. Hell, look at most big games and you'll see a token lesbian or two, or a bisexual woman, or in the case of Ellie, a straight upn lesbian main character in a huge AAA game. Then, expand that out to tv and cartoons, and you have multiple big popular shows that are almost nothing BUT lesbians(She Ra and Steven universe, for example), and nothing for gay men and boys.For people saying including lesbians is basically nothing (lesbians must feel so happy that you think so!) I can add that they have both a pre-made household of two married men and a pre-made household with a non-binary sim. Sure they are not on the covers (yet), but there is a lot of good representation in the game.
Maybe in 20 years
Can someone explain this to me? A lesbian couple isn't lgbtq?Why don't you just call it what it is. They are a lesbian couple, not lgbtq.
Ask for more gay guy and transgender representation, absolutely, I do that too. I know that LGBTQ+-women are way more represented than men and non-binary and I try to promote anything I can find that does anything remotely good with the latter. But I despise the "pff, just a couple of lesbians again" vibe that comes with these things, like it didn't matter at all. It does matter greatly to many lesbian women. It's not because lesbian women are included that gay men are not. Blame the hetero norm and homophobia, not the lesbian representation.Nobody is saying it means nothing, but lesbians being vastly more marketable and tolerable for higher ups is a known factor and one that permeates pretty much all media. Hell, look at most big games and you'll see a token lesbian or two, or a bisexual woman, or in the case of Ellie, a straight upn lesbian main character in a huge AAA game. Then, expand that out to tv and cartoons, and you have multiple big popular shows that are almost nothing BUT lesbians(She Ra and Steven universe, for example), and nothing for gay men and boys.
It's hard to always feel good for lesbians/bi girls when we're always either ignored or hidden in the process.
It's hard to always feel good for lesbians/bi girls when we're always either ignored or hidden in the process, or made into awful flamboyant caricatures.
All of the Sims on the expansion, game, and stuff pack covers are named in the gallery.
The toddler pack one is darkly hilarious, because the cover doesn't have any adults, so the toddlers don't have any parents or guardians.
I get that, which is why i purposely ignore things like that(Like how I absolutely despise yaoi and fujoshis, and dont factor that into gay male representation), but even ignoring all those, theres still a much, much greater breadth of content for lesbians than gay men.I get that, and we absolutely need more gay guys prominently represented in things, but "the lesbians get all the representation" is only part of the picture when it ignores how much of what we do get is pandering to straight guys and contributing to their ongoing fetishisation of queer women
I get not liking the vibe some of us may give off(Hell, I feel shitty myself feeling envious like that) But it'll likely just get worse the longer this goes on which is why I'd rather help speak up now than let it fester in silence, though my grievances toward the lack of gays is never aimed at lesbians getting the rep/being happy or the people putting it out(except maybe at Rebecca Sugar, who's biggest show is almost nothing but lesbians with not a single homosexual male character, and that has always skeeved me out), but instead the shittiness of higher ups and the inherent societal homophobia at the root.Ask for more gay guy and transgender representation, absolutely, I do that too. I know that LGBTQ+-women are way more represented than men and non-binary and I try to promote anything I can find that does anything remotely good with the latter. But I despise the "pff, just a couple of lesbians again" vibe that comes with these things, like it didn't matter at all. It does matter greatly to many lesbian women. It's not because lesbian women are included that gay men are not. Blame the hetero norm and homophobia, not the lesbian representation.
This thing also comes just a month after Maxis made a huge mistake with their last patch, the one that added a bunch of Pride stuff in collaboration with the It Gets Better Project. There is a flag you can hang on the wall now that comes in many different variations. Gay pride, trans pride, asexual pride and so on. But at first, there was no lesbian flag option, they were completely overlooked. I learned a lot from the discussions that happened after that in regards to how lesbian women feel about representation and how the rest of the LGBTQ+ community reacted to it (which I would describe with a word like "flippant" maybe). There is a huge problem with hand-waving away the need for actually good lesbian representation. Much of what we get is fetishized stuff ment for the male gaze.
Jesus, lolWhy don't you just call it what it is. They are a lesbian couple, not lgbtq.
The game is five years old so they felt it needed a face lift (some would say it's more of a kick to the face but whatever) and they also want to make it clear they are not gonna abandon this game anytime soon.
Wouldn't want to frighten the children by making them picture two bears, wearing nothing but "Kiss the Cook" aprons, pressing their greasy sausages together.
There's nothing like gay representation that just happens to cater to straight men at the same time.
I'm guessing the L lgbtq stands for llama.
Now I know which mod I am downloading next.
I always thought they were random and some of them were characters use in the trailers but not the ones in the households already made in the game, but maybe im remembering wrong then.The cover characters have been the pre-made household sims since at least The Sims 3, with names and stories and everything. Even back in The Sims 1 they used the households you could start playing with (with info and all) in promotional material. It didn't start now.
They also featured the gay couples wedding in the Pets expansion trailer - keep in mind the Pets expansion is also their most popular expansion tooTbf, there is a gay male couple in-game(included in the cats and dogs expansion I believe), and one of the guys is on that expansion's cover, but that requires you to buy the $40/$20 expansion.
The Sims has certainly been making strides in inclusion though, there's no denying that.
Adding to this, in the Vampires teaser you can see one of the pre-made male vamps flirt with both women and men.They also featured the guy couples wedding in the Pets expansion trailer - keep in mind the Pets expansion is also their most popular expansion too
Thought you couldn't do that anymore. I used to give parties, invite the pizzaguy, ,clown, place furtniture in front of the fireplace and delete all exitpoints.As long as i can still kill an entire family off in a sadistic way and have their ghosts marry the living, im down
You can definitely still do that. Sims are not as useless around a fire nowadays so that way is harder but there are other ways to kill whole households and NPCs. Let them all be eaten by cowplants!Thought you couldn't do that anymore. I used to give parties, invite the pizzaguy, ,clown, place furtniture in front of the fireplace and delete all exitpoints.
OT: I thought The Sims already had LGBTQ Sims in them.
Why don't you just call it what it is. They are a lesbian couple, not lgbtq.
Nobody is saying it means nothing, but lesbians being vastly more marketable and tolerable for higher ups is a known factor and one that permeates pretty much all media.
Killer post. I hope the other person takes heed. 🙏I wish we were even remotely on that level. This very thread shows that we aren't. Whenever there's a scrap thrown our way, legions of guys come out of the woodworks diminishing it - just like you are doing, by the way. Every single time. The actual reality is like the complete opposite of what you're stating.
It has a reason that even today, gay male characters in media are taken more seriously (and portrayed more seriously) than lesbians are. Companies do their damnest to avoid the L-word to ensure guys can pretend that no, not lesbian, actually bisexual, so men can be included in threesomes. Lesbians are probably the *least* marketable of the four letters, precisely because straight guys get so utterly bent out of shape at the idea of a woman that doesn't want to be with a guy - while especially the G of LGBT tends to pretend that awful portrayals of L are somehow proof that *any* portrayal of us is actually bad somehow. Reminds me of GoT, where we got actual gay dudes - and random sex between women to titilate guys in the literal text of the show, which somehow was considered equal representation. Yeah right. And people wondered why I dropped it immediately.
Really, even the tiniest lesbian representation gets attacked by both the usual straight dude parade *and* supposed allies in the community. And in most media, I still see more gay guys than lesbian women. What we actually have in media is "women kiss other women for brief media attention, then return being exclusively portrayed with men". Indie games are literally the exception, and even there there's only a handful more lesbian women than gay men (many of which got marketing push "dude options" into the story so the straight guys wouldn't get angry - life is strange being the most blatant example).
It is especially bad here because when you factor in other content like trailers, the pets expansion already has a more prominently gay male couple in marketing content, what with a wedding and all. That gets ignored, since it's always fun to complain about representation for lesbians in male-dominated forums, for some reason.
I wonder why. I wonder why.
Major expansion just dropped, so I would assume this is updated boxart to accommodate the added content.I didn't realise there was a new sims game.
EDIT: wait... this game came out in 2014.
Is this a re-release or something?
That's super cool and I'm happy but I'm a bit confused. At first I thought this was a new game but apparently Sims 4 is already out and they just changed the cover? For what purpose exactly? I'm a bit out of the loop.
To celebrate the release both the 5th year anniversary and the new Moschino Stuff pack the game is getting a new visual identity signified by the new package among other things.I didn't realise there was a new sims game.
EDIT: wait... this game came out in 2014.
Is this a re-release or something?
Great post and very needed. Thank you for taking the time to write it. :)I wish we were even remotely on that level. This very thread shows that we aren't. Whenever there's a scrap thrown our way, legions of guys come out of the woodworks diminishing it - just like you are doing, by the way. Every single time. The actual reality is like the complete opposite of what you're stating.
It has a reason that even today, gay male characters in media are taken more seriously (and portrayed more seriously) than lesbians are. Companies do their damnest to avoid the L-word to ensure guys can pretend that no, not lesbian, actually bisexual, so men can be included in threesomes. Lesbians are probably the *least* marketable of the four letters, precisely because straight guys get so utterly bent out of shape at the idea of a woman that doesn't want to be with a guy - while especially the G of LGBT tends to pretend that awful portrayals of L are somehow proof that *any* portrayal of us is actually bad somehow. Reminds me of GoT, where we got actual gay dudes - and random sex between women to titilate guys in the literal text of the show, which somehow was considered equal representation. Yeah right. And people wondered why I dropped it immediately.
Really, even the tiniest lesbian representation gets attacked by both the usual straight dude parade *and* supposed allies in the community. And in most media, I still see more gay guys than lesbian women. What we actually have in media is "women kiss other women for brief media attention, then return being exclusively portrayed with men". Indie games are literally the exception, and even there there's only a handful more lesbian women than gay men (many of which got marketing push "dude options" into the story so the straight guys wouldn't get angry - life is strange being the most blatant example).
It is especially bad here because when you factor in other content like trailers, the pets expansion already has a more prominently gay male couple in marketing content, what with a wedding and all. That gets ignored, since it's always fun to complain about representation for lesbians in male-dominated forums, for some reason.
I wonder why. I wonder why.
I don't think they're downplaying women's issues. Gay men aren't represented all that much either, possibly even less than gay women.Man this thread is pretty depressing. I understand gay males need more representation, but coming into a thread just to say, "yeah whatever but what about the MEN" is just...well it reminds me of certain other womens' issues that get downplayed and thrown to the side because of whataboutisms.
I don't think they're downplaying women's issues. Gay men aren't represented all that much either, possibly even less than gay women.