Do note that the SEC can't really do anything about bad workplaces, misogyny, discrimination, etc. They are not the part of the gov that has purview over this.
What they CAN do is evaluate if investors were mislead or defrauded about the company because any of the above was not properly disclosed but was known by company execs, and it effects the nature of the investment. It's a bit of a roundabout
This was the question I had when I first saw this.
SEC investigations are about whether investors were defrauded. The only way I can see that being the case is if some internal audit of this stuff had happened, execs were aware it was a company-wide problem, but decided not to disclose to market, that would be problematic. Otherwise, if they were just viewing it as a case-by-case basis and then just kind of sloughed it off, it would mean they didn't intend to defraud the market.
Financial fraud always comes with that little bit of difficulty where it must be proven that the accused
knew they were committing fraud or believed it must be hidden from affected parties. If the market was not one of those parties, the SEC will likely not be able to do much.
But more scrutiny on them is good.