• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
It's such a good idea, they had to make sure to ruin it as much as possible. Flipping the entire Star Wars concept on its head while retaining the forward momentum of the mythos? NAH. Slam the brakes on and rewind the conflict back 40 years for nostalgia porn reasons again.

What if people don't want the entire Star Wars concept flipped on its head?
 

TheDinoman

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,096
Lmao@ them getting the writers of batman vs superman jurassic world and monster trucks to write this movie

ab60e061981e151c7f44bce131df1f57.png


This is like, the Voltron of failure right here.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,670
What if people don't want the entire Star Wars concept flipped on its head?

Then they just want pale photocopies of the original films with better special effects and worse characters. And at that point, do we really need more Star Wars at all?

It's not a problem to tell the story through a new lens and explore a different kind of conflict. That's GOOD storytelling, rather than just awkwardly replicating movies from 40 years ago with zero plan.
 

Odeko

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Mar 22, 2018
15,180
West Blue
It's such a good idea, they had to make sure to ruin it as much as possible. Flipping the entire Star Wars concept on its head while retaining the forward momentum of the mythos? NAH. Slam the brakes on and rewind the conflict back 40 years for nostalgia porn reasons again.
Wait, how was that premise flipping Star Wars on its head? That's like the set-up to half of the movies?

RJ had the opportunity actually subvert expectations in an interesting way by having Rey and Ben team up and he doesn't do it, so TLJ ends with things as basically the status quo — the evil empire is chasing the good rebels.
 

HamSandwich

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,605
Rewatching TLJ last night for me reaffirmed the fact that it's the 2nd best movie in the saga behind Empire.

I'm seeing TRoS tonight and I'm most likely going to enjoy it, but it sucks that they're actively trying to retcon TLJ.
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
Then they just want pale photocopies of the original films with better special effects and worse characters. And at that point, do we really need more Star Wars at all?

It's not a problem to tell the story through a new lens and explore a different kind of conflict. That's GOOD storytelling, rather than just awkwardly replicating movies from 40 years ago with zero plan.

I'm pretty sure there's middle ground between "Flipped on its Head" and "Uncreative Retreading."
Not everything has to be a deconstruction I feel. What if I like Star Wars because I liked the elements normally associated with Star Wars?
 

Fj0823

Legendary Duelist
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,658
Costa Rica
Remember how many say that MCU movies get a higher score than they deserve just for the brand?

After sleeping on this movie. I'm convinced that's happening here.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,670
I'm pretty sure there's middle ground between "Flipped on its Head" and "Uncreative Retreading."
Not everything has to be a deconstruction I feel. What if I like Star Wars because I liked the elements normally associated with Star Wars?

It would STILL BE those elements, just without the EXACT SAME final boss fight as last time. Having Kylo as an unhinged maniac terribly leading the First Order while the Resistance steadily grows in strength and chips away at their powerbase is still Star Wars, it's just not "HERE IS THE BIGGEST BAD WITH THE BESTEST FORCE POWERS, IS HE NOT BADASS!?!?!?!?!?!?!" again.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,670
Wait, how was that premise flipping Star Wars on its head? That's like the set-up to half of the movies?

RJ had the opportunity actually subvert expectations in an interesting way by having Rey and Ben team up and he doesn't do it, so TLJ ends with things as basically the status quo — the evil empire is chasing the good rebels.

It was very clearly stated by the end of TLJ that Kylo would've made a TERRIBLE Supreme Leader and his troops were already viewing him as an emotional wreck and not taking him seriously, even BEFORE Luke embarrassed him in front of the entire galaxy. That's a completely different kind of framework for JJ to play around with, with a weakened and desperate First Order being pulled in multiple directions by Kylo's madness and the 'purists' (Hux, etc) wanting to preserve their original mission while Luke's sacrifice inspires people and planets all around the galaxy to rise up against them.

The final film in the story could've featured an unbalanced First Order and an ascendant Resistance, flipping the "scrappy rebels versus impossible odds" conflict of the past five movies on its head. That would've been a great way to change up the finale - a desperate, flailing First Order trying anything possible to scrape out a final victory.
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
It's a TROS thread and the main argument is still about TLJ.
I mean what is there to talk about without spoils. The reviews are out and we see where the critics stand.
It would STILL BE those elements, just without the EXACT SAME final boss fight as last time. Having Kylo as an unhinged maniac terribly leading the First Order while the Resistance steadily grows in strength and chips away at their powerbase is still Star Wars, it's just not "HERE IS THE BIGGEST BAD WITH THE BESTEST FORCE POWERS, IS HE NOT BADASS!?!?!?!?!?!?!" again.
Ah I mistook what you meant. I thought you were discussing a deconstruction of the concept of Star Wars itself, not the power dynamic.

Though to be fair, the prequels were about a strong established good guy side getting blindsided by a much smaller evil side. So lets not act like "Empire Bad Rebel Good" is a universal constant in Star Wars.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,670
Ah I mistook what you meant. I thought you were discussing a deconstruction of the concept of Star Wars itself, not the power dynamic.

Though to be fair, the prequels were about a strong established good guy side getting blindsided by a much smaller evil side. So lets not act like "Empire Bad Rebel Good" is a universal constant in Star Wars.

It's not a universal constant, but it has been the universal constant for the past five (chronological) episodes.
 

TheExecutive

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
892
I'm pretty sure there's middle ground between "Flipped on its Head" and "Uncreative Retreading."
Not everything has to be a deconstruction I feel. What if I like Star Wars because I liked the elements normally associated with Star Wars?
Then there is a perfectly good trilogy created 40 years ago for you to enjoy. For as shitty as the prequels are you have to respect them for telling a somewhat coherent story. The new trilogy is simply a rehash with some twists. I mean Starkiller Base? Seriously? The Star Wars universe has unlimited potential and they choose to create Starkiller Base? The First Order is a weaker less coherent Empire and almost none of the interesting story arcs prevail in the two movies.

For what they are they are fun but it doesn't progress the Star Wars universe in any meaningful way and I believe they should have.
 

Thorn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
24,446
It's not a universal constant, but it has been the universal constant for the past five (chronological) episodes.
Trust me, I wont be going around defending JJ's initial decision to have the Empire back as some giant super power vs a small Rebellion in TFA.

I really thought TLJ was going to be leading into some like 5+ year time skip which I honestly was very worried about. So I'm not exactly devastated the next movie is ignoring that and Jedi Janitor Kid.
 

Odeko

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Mar 22, 2018
15,180
West Blue
It was very clearly stated by the end of TLJ that Kylo would've made a TERRIBLE Supreme Leader and his troops were already viewing him as an emotional wreck and not taking him seriously, even BEFORE Luke embarrassed him in front of the entire galaxy. That's a completely different kind of framework for JJ to play around with, with a weakened and desperate First Order being pulled in multiple directions by Kylo's madness and the 'purists' (Hux, etc) wanting to preserve their original mission while Luke's sacrifice inspires people and planets all around the galaxy to rise up against them.

The final film in the story could've featured an unbalanced First Order and an ascendant Resistance, flipping the "scrappy rebels versus impossible odds" conflict of the past five movies on its head. That would've been a great way to change up the finale - a desperate, flailing First Order trying anything possible to scrape out a final victory.
I'd say that was sort of what the prequels and TFA were (at least in terms of power dynamics, not leadership competency), but yeah that wouldn't have been terrible either. I still think I prefer the movie I imagined in the theater when it seemed like Ben and Rey were actually going to realize that the Sith v Jedi conflict is stupid and self-destructive and that they should team up.

Both would definitely be better than what we got though.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,670
Trust me, I wont be going around defending JJ's initial decision to have the Empire back as some giant super power vs a small Rebellion in TFA.

I really thought TLJ was going to be leading into some like 5+ year time skip which I honestly was very worried about. So I'm not exactly devastated the next movie is ignoring that and Jedi Janitor Kid.

There was never going to be a chance of that kid being the main character. It was just a theme scene.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,670
The movie literally ends on the kid, no? Some sort of "Welp the good guys are down to like...12 people but hey look this kid has hope!" message I believe. Noooot exactly inspiring confidence here.

The kid is narrative shorthand. He's saying the entire galaxy was inspired by Luke's sacrifice. That's all.
 

NameUser

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,011
Not necessarily one director, but just like - say - Mandalorian, or the original Trilogy, it should've had one 'showrunner'. Multiple directors and script writers are fine, but a trilogy needs a single person / team of people at the helm throughout.
imho
Totally. Like Marvel. I'm sure the directors know what they can and can't do. Johnson should've never been allowed to just deconstruct everything.
 

jstevenson

Developer at Insomniac Games
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
2,042
Burbank CA
I can see why people took issue with it back then but it's obvious that Snoke was killed off in service of making Kylo Ren a more compelling villain. Most people would agree that he's been the best part of these movies, so the angle of making him Snoke's ball-and-chain the same way Darth Vader was to Palpatine never sat well with me and I'm glad RJ went against this. Kylo wanted to surpass all of them and tried so damn hard to be the "boss", so the way they snuffed out Snoke made perfect sense.

Exactly
 

TheIlliterati

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
4,782
You all fail to see the bigger picture here(from the Rolling Stone review)

'OK, the final episode isn't perfect. You'll nitpick it forever with your friends. But that's the point. Star Wars isn't a movie, it's family. We're that close to it. And the in-fighting about what it does right and wrong is as crucial as the love. '
My family and friends disowned me. I disown STARW ARSSSSS