It's really not that bewildering.
He left JJ with shit. Literally, there was not a single plot point left exploring except Rey and Kylo. That's not enough, that is squarely on Rian.
I'll be amazed if it worse than TPM or AOTC. Seems like hyperbole to me.I don't really put much stock in Jeremy Jahns reviews but he thought it was the worst Star Wars movie? God DAMN
maybe if there is an actual financial downside to this, she can be blamed, but if it's not a flop commercially and she left the creative decisions up to someone else then...?
If this gets below 53% (Phantom Menace), we are gonna see some shit
Here's an interview that has a good outline of her involvement: https://io9.gizmodo.com/star-wars-kathleen-kennedy-on-the-long-road-to-ending-t-1840267035i thought the whole point was that she didn't interfere in creative decisions?
seems like she gets blamed for everything. rian made tlj, it's kathleen's fault. jj makes this, it's kathleen's fault.
But it's not...I've heard people say sometimes, "Well, isn't that just a committee approach?" And it's not. I've worked as a producer in film my entire career. And I always consider myself a voice in the room. But it's not my ultimate decision. It's the decision of the director, ultimately. And your job is to serve up as many curated possibilities that they can choose from, work with, see if it's going to fit in the mosaic of storytelling and then arrive at a point of view to move forward. And I just think we had a great working relationship with J.J. on this to really arrive at something that we all felt was emotionally meaningful and satisfying. And I think, knock on wood, that the fans are going to feel that, and they're going to feel listened to. I think that's always been an important thing to Lucasfilm is the fans are every bit as important to us as what any of us do. And I hope they feel that way with this.
I get you're doing this as a "joke" but really?
The only way he'd work as a villain would be if they used him not as a direct powerhouse, but just due to the First Order under him having numerical advantage over the resistance. Still, Iike I said before, this was never on the cards. The clash between light and dark side has been in the center of this trilogy,so they'd never push that aside in the final movie for a "force taking down an army" take.
And before you say "It's not just animal it's a member of the family and I love him/her!" you don't. Well, to be specific, you don't love a pet before you spend substantial time with it. You are adopting/purchasing a pet to fall in love with it.
Can someone explain to me the 'new direction' RJ took Star Wars in? The movie didn't go anywhere.
I am curious too... other than shitting all over great characters.
This. I don't understand this new direction he took Star Wars in talk and never have. One of the problems, if not the biggest problem with TLJ, is that it didn't go anywhere. The plot doesn't really move forward at all. The characters are largely in one spot the entire time. It has the smallest scale and scope of all the Star Wars films. It can be argued the reason TROS might be overstuffed as claimed is because it has to make up for TLJ not really progressing the plot and universe.
Best post in this thread hands down. Give this man a raise.Disney need to step back, take a breath, go back to the drawing board andMake a Kyle Katarn meets Dash Rendar buddy cop movie
Oh I'm not more plugged into anything. If that was the plan from the start, it was a bad idea from the get go, IMO. This trilogy needed to be its own story to tell.Apparently, so I've been told by the more hardcore SW fans on the site anyway, they had planned the whole 'conclusion to the Sky Walker saga' angle from very early on in the initial process. I think it was Crossing Eden that mentioned that?
I know you're a bit more plugged into that stuff, any insight?
Just a little close. TPM will finally be redeemed!
Is that counting the Holiday Special?
So hypothetically speaking, if TROS underperforms (no way it outright bombs) will that not be Kennedy's fault?
yep. Clearly Kylo doesn't stand a chance with the entire first order behind him. why even bother continuing a movie where all the main protagonists barely escape and the resistance barely stands a chance while the main antagonist is clearly unstable with unimaginable power behind him. Sounds super boring.
the posts in here are ridiculous
So, what will Chris Terrio's next project be after helping burn the DCEU and Star Wars to the ground? Maybe it's time for a Lord of the Rings reboot?
We survived a trilogy of all bad movies.
We will survive a trilogy with one bad movie.
Please stop comparing Star Wars to GOT. You are better than this.
That makes Kylo desperate. And a desperate villain is something I don't think we've dealt with in Star Wars before. For someone who idolized powerful Dark Lords like Vader, he's insecure and afraid that he's not powerful enough to become one. I think there are definite places you could take that dynamic with Kylo without making him just a rehash of Vader.
I think you need to reframe the way you're looking at Kylo. If you're looking at him as Vader 2, yes, he sucks at that.
But if you look at him as someone who DESPERATELY WANTS to be Vader 2 but is incredibly BAD AT IT, there's a whole ton of story potential you can mine there. Luke trolling him through the Force, causing him to fuck up and weakening his support base with the First Order. His impulsive, "nothing matters" mentality leading him to sacrifice huge swathes of his own men on fruitless pursuits while allied planets turn on him and side with the Resistance. The regenerating Resistance starting to push back and actually damage the First Order backing him into a corner and causing him to desperately lash out like a mad dog.
The problem is that a lot of people made the decision at moment 1 that Kylo HAS to go through Vader's arc and HAS TO BE redeemed, rather than showing him as the portrait of pathetic, toxic masculinity he is.
i thought the whole point was that she didn't interfere in creative decisions?
I agree. The fault of this trilogy is ultimately upon Kathleen and the people in charge at Lucasfilm for not having a clear outline and allowing directors to write the story for them. It would work if it was one director for the whole trilogy, but they wanted to change it up in response to reactions as they went. They treated the IP like the typical disposable summer blockbuster and it shows.The buck stops with the leadership group in charge of SW. I know some get angry when people call for Kathleen Kennedy to move on but the buck stops with her. We now have two straight flops and in any other business, leadership is responsible. Well not all the time, sometimes leadership remains and underlings are scapegoated and get the can but let's hope that doesn't happen this time. Arguing about TLJ is like arguing about table settings on the Titanic at this point.
If TLJ is so imaginative and original how come it couldn't produce anything new by the end of its runtime?
Any climactic clash between the light and dark shouldn't be resolved with a lightsaber duel anyway, IMO. I mean, sure, it can be a part of it, but there's gotta be more to it than that. That's why Rey beating Kylo never bothered me. Because that whole arc shouldn't be resolved with "who can outpower one another?"You're looking at this too simply. You can still DO the clash between light and dark without it being yet another tired lightsaber duel that reveals nothing new.
It ain't doing that bad...