Using this logic, wouldn't it be in Microsoft's best interest to fund a pro patch in order to maximize sales on all possible platforms?
How much sense does that make? MS didn't fund or publish this game. Ya'll are saying silly stuff.
No it's not. Horrible comparison.
Okay why? Sony owns horizon and MS owns outer worlds how is that different? And what does funding and publishing have to do with this? MS now owns the IP and will fund any potential sequels
Sure, Microsoft didn't publish the title, but they seem to have worked out a deal for an X patch. Why wouldn't they do the same for a pro patch? It's their IP after all.
Makes no sense and it's a horrible comparison.
Yours wasn't and it still doesn't change my point that nothing has been decided about the future of The Outer Worlds even if a sequel is made it's likely to be a MS exclusive.
So hypothetically (because we don't actually know), TOW was never going to get an enhanced patch for either (or maybe they would have much later). MS is making sure the X version does by allocating more resources for that to happen. Are you saying it's shady for MS to not allocate more resources for a competing platform for something that was never going to happen in the first place regardless (i.e. MS would be paying for a Pro patch themselves)? This isn't them blocking anything, so none of these complaints make sense with regards to how it's MS' fault or whatever (blocking makes 0 sense).
You constantly saying "it's not a good comparison" isn't a good argument.
But you're not giving any reasons why you think my Comparison is "horrible". I'm not arguing with you that nothings been decided I'm only pointing out that I can make the same argument about a Sony owned IP. You remember how ridiculous I sound saying horizon could come out for Xbox? That's how ridiculous you sound saying that a potential sequel could come out for PS5.
lmfaoo this one is a good one.
I think you're right that MS may have decided this, but another also plausible justification was also posted many times here. What if there weren't going to be any enhancements at all and with MS backing they were able to add this? I more pessimistic than that but I do think that it's just as plausible
Because a Sony Owned IP isn't being originally funded and published by a third party publisher and put also on a major console competitor. nor does Sony have the same business plans that Xbox does. You see how stupid this is?
Just stop. The comparison is stupid. Do I really have to go in detail why?
Sure.
Please stop. Your comparison was stupid.
Never said it had anything to do with MS. I never even mentioned MS in my posts.
As were your posts🙄. At least we can both agree on ending the back and forth😁!
1440p is a huge jump from 1080p and nothing really to scoff at
We have a MS exec all but confirming that any potential sequel would be MS exclusive. Which make both your points invalid.
Mine wasn't. Which goes back to my point that nothing has been decided about the future of The Outer Worlds and MS will make a decision based on data.
LOL@ at "all but confirm" No he didn't but definitely hinted that it's likely.
Lol... Why not just wait for reviews to see if the game is good or not? What's this weird stuff about "misplaced faith"?
Not that I think the game will bomb on PlayStation because of this or anything, but I do think it'd be amusing if enough people boycotted the PlayStation version and caused the game to bomb on that platform, causing the conspiracy theory that Microsoft won't release a sequel on a PlayStation platform to come true. And of course people would blame Microsoft, anyway, but it'd make for some pretty interesting irony.
But that brings back the completely obvious as fuck blanket statement that nothing has been decided about the future of any franchise past however many games are currently planned/in development.
