• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Illest1

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
675
my immigration story is the exact opposite. I want to give back to a place which has given me so much. And I know it is not perfect. For what it's worth, I am not white.

This right here is why ICE needs to go. Not saying you are undocumented btw. Referring to the mindset and spirit of the teens of thousands (millions?) who are undocumented and love this country for what it affords them. These are the kind of people ICE is ripping from their children. People who just want a decent life and cannot have one where they originated from.

Resist ICE.
 

Advance_Alarm

Banned
Dec 4, 2017
316
You're asking me for my take on how I would structure immigration policy and I don't have that for you, I'm not an expert in immigration policy or theory so I'm not going to draw arbitrary lines for you to attempt to knock down.

My post was responding to "why do people not like ICE", and part of the reason is that they are pretty consistently shitty in breaking up families with no criminal activity. In fact, the majority of people in immigration detention centers aren't even there for crimes outside of their undocumented status. It's clear that the United States Government with the establishment of DHS changed to a more aggressive enforcement of immigration policy, you can't really deny that. This approach to immigration enforcement has been upheld for the last 16 years over the course of three (and counting) administrations.

I feel like it's really lazy, and boring tbh, to try to litigate the details of immigration policy every time we talk about immigration. The United States would not be able to function without both it's migrant residents, lawful or not. This is empirically true across a number of metrics. People are asking for a more compassionate approach to this issue that doesn't involve kicking people out who have been here decades because "rules are rules"

This is selection what the article in the OP says: "cruelly and wantonly breaking up families", "opaque and racist deportation force", "you should look over your shoulder and you should be worried", 'targeting of politcal opponents", "targeting of aliens who talk to the media about ICE." It also goes towards your point about discussing "why people do not like ICE".

I posted about immigration details and codification which you called "lazy and boring". Wouldn't increased codification redress or eliminate the things listed in the article? If you codify who and who isn't subject to removal you could eliminate the "wanton" removals, "opaque" removals, and "politcial" removals. If the system was clearly codified then it would eliminate "looking over your shoulder" because it would be clear if you were subject to removal or not. In fact, if you wish for "a more compassionate approach" what way would you define that other than through codification and policy proposals?

I would say it is lazy to think that discussing the abolishment of an agency of over 20,000 employees should not include any public policy talk.
 

Nesotenso

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,072
This right here is why ICE needs to go. Not saying you are undocumented btw. Referring to the mindset and spirit of the teens of thousands (millions?) who are undocumented and love this country for what it affords them. These are the kind of people ICE is ripping from their children. People who just want a decent life and cannot have one where they originated from.

Resist ICE.

I mean what you are talking about has been attempted. Any sort of comprehensive immigration reform has to include one time amnesty for illegals who have already setup roots and familial ties. The republicans hate the idea so it goes nowhere fast.
 
Oct 25, 2017
29,501
Normally i'd cut a department like ICE some slack(maybe not that, benefit of the doubt or something) with a tough issue like immigration and especially with the administration they are serving.....

But nope, the stories we are hearing are absolutely horrendous.
screw 'em.
 

FaceHugger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
13,949
USA
Normally i'd cut a department like ICE some slack(maybe not that, benefit of the doubt or something) with a tough issue like immigration and especially with the administration they are serving.....

But nope, the stories we are hearing are absolutely horrendous.
screw 'em.

I mean, do we really need a police-force like group for immigration issues? One with SWAT team like elements and aggressive swarming tactics? It's fucking silly and ripe for abuse, xenophobia, and excess. Just kill it already and make things like they used to be. It was one of my major disappointments with Obama and the brief time the D's held Congress under him. They could have done something. Hell I think they extended their powers.
 

Deepwater

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,349
This is selection what the article in the OP says: "cruelly and wantonly breaking up families", "opaque and racist deportation force", "you should look over your shoulder and you should be worried", 'targeting of politcal opponents", "targeting of aliens who talk to the media about ICE." It also goes towards your point about discussing "why people do not like ICE".

I posted about immigration details and codification which you called "lazy and boring". Wouldn't increased codification redress or eliminate the things listed in the article? If you codify who and who isn't subject to removal you could eliminate the "wanton" removals, "opaque" removals, and "politcial" removals. If the system was clearly codified then it would eliminate "looking over your shoulder" because it would be clear if you were subject to removal or not. In fact, if you wish for "a more compassionate approach" what way would you define that other than through codification and policy proposals?

I would say it is lazy to think that discussing the abolishment of an agency of over 20,000 employees should not include any public policy talk.

I'm not saying that there shouldn't be any discussion of public policy, I'm saying it's asinine to think that you're going to get informed, expert policy discussion on this particular subject on a video game forum. I'm smart enough to know that I'm not smart enough. That does not mean that I can't recognize that what they're doing right now is not working nor the right approaching. There needs to be a reform of immigration policy in this country, and that would include the role and power of ICE. What exactly that looks like, I don't know.

What is useless is litigating right now "Well at what point is it acceptable for someone to overstay a visa?"
 

ginger ninja

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,060
my immigration story is the exact opposite. I want to give back to a place which has given me so much. And I know it is not perfect. For what it's worth, I am not white.

This. I am also a non white immigrant and everything I have today I owe to this country. That's not to say everything is perfect, federal government and it's agencies have now actually adopted a policy of xenophobia and racism. But I take solace in knowing that the majority of the citizens of this country don't agree with the policies and hopefully eventually we all take back the ship and start the work back towards making it a more 'perfect union' as my POTUS used to say.

Also if even Obama isn't good and saintly enough for you, then idk what to tell you. Hope you're happy with the fasict upgrade currently in office.
 

Deleted member 3345

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,967
I mean, do we really need a police-force like group for immigration issues? One with SWAT team like elements and aggressive swarming tactics? It's fucking silly and ripe for abuse, xenophobia, and excess. Just kill it already and make things like they used to be. It was one of my major disappointments with Obama and the brief time the D's held Congress under him. They could have done something. Hell I think they extended their powers.

It's amazing, apparently in two years Obama and dems should have done everything at once simultaneously.

The formation of ICE came as a directive from congress, and must be dissolved as such.
 

JayC3

bork bork
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
3,857
This kind of reminds me of the United States Trade Representative (ustr.gov). They're in charge of negotiating trade deals on behalf of the United States. But, because their raison d'etre is to negotiate trade deals, they'll continue to do so even when there may be no need for any more trade deals to be negotiated. So we end up with way more many trade deals than we need.

In the same way, ICE will work to deport people simply because that's what it was designed to do. I don't see any issue with having it absorbed back into Homeland Security. Then, maybe those resources can be directed towards more useful activities than just going around and breaking up families. We'll still have immigration enforcement when necessary, but it won't be just for its own sake.
 

Deleted member 3345

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,967
This kind of reminds me of the United States Trade Representative (ustr.gov). They're in charge of negotiating trade deals on behalf of the United States. But, because their raison d'etre is to negotiate trade deals, they'll continue to do so even when there may be no need for any more trade deals to be negotiated. So we end up with way more many trade deals than we need.

In the same way, ICE will work to deport people simply because that's what it was designed to do. I don't see any issue with having it absorbed back into Homeland Security. Then, maybe those resources can be directed towards more useful activities than just going around and breaking up families. We'll still have immigration enforcement when necessary, but it won't be just for its own sake.

ICE is the enforcement and investigative arm of DHS. How would it be absorbed back into it?
 

JayC3

bork bork
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
3,857
ICE is the enforcement and investigative arm of DHS. How would it be absorbed back into it?
Get rid of the ICE director and let someone at Homeland Security redeploy the resources to non-immigration enforcement activities if they deem it desirable and appropriate.

Edit: we seem to have a big problem with white nationalists murdering people recently. We've had a bigger issue with white terrorists than, let's say, Muslim terrorists. Since DHS is in charge of dealing with terrorism, maybe they could deploy ICE resources to work on white nationalism issues instead?
 
Last edited:

FaceHugger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
13,949
USA
That plays into the 2nd part of what I meant.
Im with you.

Oh I was agreeing with you but just building on what you wrote. I should have been more clear.

It's amazing, apparently in two years Obama and dems should have done everything at once simultaneously.

The formation of ICE came as a directive from congress, and must be dissolved as such.

Yes, two years was plenty of time to address numerous problems that formed in the Bush and GOP Congress years before it. When we have four year terms and limited sessions hell yes. Expect more of your government, not less, I say.
 

ishan

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,192
This. I am also a non white immigrant and everything I have today I owe to this country. That's not to say everything is perfect, federal government and it's agencies have now actually adopted a policy of xenophobia and racism. But I take solace in knowing that the majority of the citizens of this country don't agree with the policies and hopefully eventually we all take back the ship and start the work back towards making it a more 'perfect union' as my POTUS used to say.

Also if even Obama isn't good and saintly enough for you, then idk what to tell you. Hope you're happy with the fasict upgrade currently in office.
right so agree . obama is an imperialistic asshole according to some tho. i literally have no words left to argue with on those.
 

ishan

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,192
Your terrible understanding of what ICE does makes me hope that possibility does not become reality.
my debate on it makes me hope ppl like me who arent willing to block out other views and be a resoanable person makes me hope i become one. But youre entitled to your view its a free world
 

Pein

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,231
NYC
Nah, I'm not with the whole let's be alright with people who jump borders and everything is alright than and after.
 

TheIlliterati

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
4,782
It'd be great if it could be abolished, but it won't be. "It's time"? Uh, actually, it's about the worst time ever to propose something like this that has less than zero chance of happening under this current climate.
 
Oct 27, 2017
185
I've read the article. The only reason it can cite for why this immigration enforcement agency should be abolished is because it actually enforces immigration and removes people who have broken those laws from our country.
 

acheron_xl

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,449
MSN, WI
It'd be great if it could be abolished, but it won't be. "It's time"? Uh, actually, it's about the worst time ever to propose something like this that has less than zero chance of happening under this current climate.

That's why it has to be demanded in the here and now. You can never move the Overton Window if your opening gambit is to say that now isn't the time.
 

Gaia Lanzer

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,670
...yes, because what we want is for Trump and Sessions to do a major reorganization of law enforcement. The result would be utterly utopian, I'm sure.
By Trump and Sessions? No.

But by a Democratic successor? YES! No more of this Gestapo bullshit they are aiming for right now. Though, if you ask me, the entire police force needs a culling and reorganization. New methods of training, stricter punishment for officers that violate human rights, no more letting unions sweep things under the rug through corruption. Shit like this, I always refer to as "Project: Clean House".
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,655
Because they serve an important purpose in dealing with criminals. Try researching more than what the mainstream media will dare to report on.

Of course their job is never done though and which is why I have to keep my doors locked and my beretta loaded and on my person (CCW permit of course) due to the city I live in.
Oh, interesting. Thanks for elaborating.
So what would you say about their just as if not more frequently reported on abuses of power? What specific sources are you getting information from when you decry what the "mainstream media" is reporting?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-crime-is-still-wrong/?utm_term=.f3bd590356e7

https://reason.com/archives/2018/02/01/immigrants-and-crime

https://www.cato.org/blog/immigration-myths-crime-number-illegal-immigrants

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/us/trump-illegal-immigrants-crime.html

Knowing that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than a natural born citizen does this allay your fear of immigrant crime that causes you to carry a firearm?


Things that make you go hmmm for $500, Gordon!
 

Virtua

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
512
There is no such thing as a 'lawful undocumented immigrant' and I think the people who took the time and went through the immigration process the proper way would be offended by such a notion.

Are a lot of these people here because of the apathy of the previous administration about illegal immigration, and figured they would never get caught as long as they never committed a crime?

If people are truly lawful and have good intentions they should be here but with the enforcement being what it is in 2018 why not go through the official channels?
 

Deleted member 25445

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
648
There is no such thing as a 'lawful undocumented immigrant' and I think the people who took the time and went through the immigration process the proper way would be offended by such a notion.

Are a lot of these people here because of the apathy of the previous administration about illegal immigration, and figured they would never get caught as long as they never committed a crime?

If people are truly lawful and have good intentions they should be here but with the enforcement being what it is in 2018 why not go through the official channels?
As an illegal immigrant in America who has a successful career working in a top 25 company, what official channels are you talking about?
 

Virtua

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
512
As an illegal immigrant in America who has a successful career working in a top 25 company, what official channels are you talking about?

My brother in law and his parents and siblings are all here legally and went through official channels. They are not extraordinarily wealthy or special access. I don't know about it in depth but it seemed like it took some time for all of them but wasn't impossible.
 

Deleted member 25445

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
648
My brother in law and his parents and siblings are all here legally and went through official channels. They are not extraordinarily wealthy or special access. I don't know about it in depth but it seemed like it took some time for all of them but wasn't impossible.
I don't have the luxury of leaving the country and waiting 10 years. That is my official channel. I'm an American despite anything and I'm a lawful undocumented immigrant.
 

Landawng

The Fallen
Nov 9, 2017
3,247
Denver/Aurora, CO
ICE are a bunch of fucking pussies. Saw a vid yesterday of them deporting a mother in public in front of three of her daughters. Motherfuckers. Burn it to the ground
 

Tesseract

Banned
Nov 11, 2017
2,646
if you can make it here, you should stay here

we're getting really good at border control, we don't need to go after people who have settled
 

Baji Boxer

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,380
There is no such thing as a 'lawful undocumented immigrant' and I think the people who took the time and went through the immigration process the proper way would be offended by such a notion.

Are a lot of these people here because of the apathy of the previous administration about illegal immigration, and figured they would never get caught as long as they never committed a crime?

If people are truly lawful and have good intentions they should be here but with the enforcement being what it is in 2018 why not go through the official channels?
Sure there is, that's what the whole controvery of the "Dreamers" is centered around. Babies can't commit crimes, and when raised here it's inhumane treatment to send them back to their birth country.

Your comment about the apathy of the previous administration isn't true at all, either. If you want to read up on President Obama's actions on illegal imigration, you can read this: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/obama-record-deportations-deporter-chief-or-not
 

Deleted member 3345

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,967
There is no such thing as a 'lawful undocumented immigrant' and I think the people who took the time and went through the immigration process the proper way would be offended by such a notion.

Are a lot of these people here because of the apathy of the previous administration about illegal immigration, and figured they would never get caught as long as they never committed a crime?

If people are truly lawful and have good intentions they should be here but with the enforcement being what it is in 2018 why not go through the official channels?

You realize some of the people getting ropped by ICE that are 30/40 years old, have no legal pathway, and have been in the states for 20-30 years, right?
 

bdbdbd

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,904
Yeah, I've about had it with immigration being treated like it's somehow not a fundamental source of this country's success and that illegal or undocumented immigrants who are largely well-meaning just looking for better lives are like some kind of imminent terrorist threat.

There is no such thing as a 'lawful undocumented immigrant' and I think the people who took the time and went through the immigration process the proper way would be offended by such a notion.
If the immigration process were simple and straightforward for everyone, don't you think most who want to immigrate into the country would use it? Do you really think the vast majority just *want* to be tagged as illegal or undocumented?
 

Deleted member 29676

User Requested Account Closure
Banned
Nov 1, 2017
1,804
Get rid of the ICE director and let someone at Homeland Security redeploy the resources to non-immigration enforcement activities if they deem it desirable and appropriate.

Edit: we seem to have a big problem with white nationalists murdering people recently. We've had a bigger issue with white terrorists than, let's say, Muslim terrorists. Since DHS is in charge of dealing with terrorism, maybe they could deploy ICE resources to work on white nationalism issues instead?

Head of DHS reports to the president and will have to enforce and deploy resources to what he/she says to. Congress can remove funding for immigration enforcement but if you have consensus for that you probably have consensus to change the crappy laws they are enforcing.
 

Gwenpoolshark

Member
Jan 5, 2018
4,109
The Pool
Status
Not open for further replies.