I could pay off my car loan, buy my girlfriend a $24k new car and still have a substantial amount leftover for a down payment for a house with that $55k.
Apple, you're crazy.
As someone who lives in AE every day...I can say this thing is almost exclusively for Video Editors in Final Cut or people doing some crazy stuff in Logic maybe. After Effects is garbage at utilizing cores unfortunately : /All seems to point out that this is not for 3D artist but for video editors, plus color grading, After effects, etc. In a "buy 12 get a discount" scenario. Just the lack of CUDA support alone points that way, but even the 4 Radeon chips you can put in it are optimized for video.
Sure, one can still rely mostly on the CPU rendering like 5 years ago, but now that every big software is implementing GPU accelerated renderers there simply is a hole that this machine cannot cover.
I'm also a freelancer 3D artist. One thing that gets annoying in these threads is the notion that freelancers only do videography.
Well this is also true, someone who knows their software can get a machine that will simply perform better than the Mac Pro. After Effects likes faster CPUs, and as you said it, not great at utilizing many cores.As someone who lives in AE every day...I can say this thing is almost exclusively for Video Editors in Final Cut or people doing some crazy stuff in Logic maybe. After Effects is garbage at utilizing cores unfortunately : /
Maybe compositing apps like Nuke and whatnot would run great on here though too! Definitely not affordable, I wish they would make a Prosumer tower that was modular like this...
Yeah, and the argument pretty much holds up! I remember using the old cheese grater at previous jobs that were pretty obscenely loaded, at least it came in handy for me sometimes doing simulation stuff too! I just miss being able to use OSX for work stuff though ;(Well this is also true, someone who knows their software can get a machine that will simply perform better than the Mac Pro. After Effects likes faster CPUs, and as you said it, not great at utilizing many cores.
At the end of the day I have to agree with the argument that it is not for individuals, but for a company that just tries to covers all the bases for potential employees even thought the machine is not the best at any particular thing.
This seems like a rather off-putting comment considering this is an incredibly mild joke.Recent events have shown ResetERA mods are far from infallible.
What is the problem here? Let's make a thread about similarly specced Windows setups that cost more or the same?
Also, this will probably be bought by a lot of freelancers as well, not just evil mega corps.
What's with the Crysis joke? Weird troll thread from a moderator.
?I was just building one of these today but then I found out Steam is still not supported which seems crazy so I would have no way to play Half Life Alyx and now I'm so torn
?
Steam works on Catalina. Is there some other reason specific to the new Mac Pro?
I was just building one of these today but then I found out Steam is still not supported which seems crazy so I would have no way to play Half Life Alyx and now I'm so torn
Steam is a separate thing as HL:A. Steam as the application itself works in Catalina. HL:A is not confirmed to anything but Windows (as it uses SteamVR), but it might be compatible later on as Linux should get SteamVR support soon(tm), which should also help for MacOS.It does!? Oh man I thought Half Life Alyx wasn't listed as compatible. This changes everything
Workstation = console?
Holy crap! Who besides businesses can buy this? Or would want to do so?
People whose time saved is worth the cost of investment. If you are a professional who relies on computing power to make a living, and you can get an adequate return on investment for buying this machine, then it is for you.Holy crap! Who besides businesses can buy this? Or would want to do so?
People like MKBHD (who is obviously a business, but that's beside the point) who edit and transcode / render a lot of 8K footage and will get a return on investment in terms of time saved.Holy crap! Who besides businesses can buy this? Or would want to do so?
What Mac Pro benchmarks are you comparing to these?
Already beaten by TR3, and not even by a chip that's in the same price segment lol.
These are older benches from the 3970X launch, and you're right the mac pro will likely be much more thermally constrained.What Mac Pro benchmarks are you comparing to these?
I would not expect the passively cooled Xeon W in the Mac Pro to be a fast as a W-3175X.
The warning I got yesterday indicates to me that not all mods agree with all executions of humor.What does there have to be a problem? Can't there be a discussion and maybe humor without some grand conspiracy?
Already beaten by TR3, and not even by a chip that's in the same price segment lol.
I am curious to see what comes of the afterburner card in terms of if someone will offer other configurations for the FGPA, but at $2000 a pop, that's quite a bit just to tinker.
Absolute lunacy. The hold Apple have on their customers is both cynical and insidious.
RAM is a traded commodity, heavily protected by various national interests and the market has damn near open price fixing, along with small profit margins. Most of your high capacity ECC chips will just get thrown out/recycled into the new batch because the lithography didn't hold up, which is unavoidable. The logic of how RAM works in the market is basically different from all other computer hardware.
It's faster than the xeon chip in every way, please show me any kind of load that the xeon succeeds in because I'd love to hear about it. Even considering the tests these are very real programsCool synthetic benchmarks of individual CPUs from a tech blog. Export a 90 minute feature film timeline to prores or DCP (Resolve Windows can't even do this), or render 5-6 VFX comps in a cramped, stuffy studio during an LA summer and get back to me. That's what this type of computer was made for
I have no idea why you'd get so upset, it's merely an observation of how Apple stumbled into bad luck with CPU releases, although they probably would have stuck intel regardless, considering they have better ties in the workstation space. Is this an apple fan thing?
I could report you for being weirdly aggressive for no reason, but that seems awfully unncessary. I don't really care who the puts out the hardware, and I'm not saying Apple is an awful company in any way.I'm not upset, just don't really understand why synthetic benchmarks would be indicative of real world performance. Do you? We're not even considering the fact that they might prefer Intel for business reasons or for Thunderbolt compatibility. Or AVX 512 which I don't really think is a big deal for most users but still.
PS- reported for the "apple fan" thing. I'm tired of platform warring going largely unchecked in tech topics.