• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

RatskyWatsky

Are we human or are we dancer?
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,931
vSVr5lV.jpg


Traversing trippy worlds inside his universe simulator, a space caster explores existential questions about life, death and everything in between.

Trailer

Reviews

IndieWire said:
The small miracle of "Adventure Time" in its earliest season came from creator Pendleton Ward's ability to juggle ingredients that shouldn't work so well together. The show was silly and profound in equal measures, treating that balance as the ultimate yin and yang. "The Midnight Gospel" brings that same notion to ambitious new heights, shedding the pretense of a "children's show" that sometimes hindered the reach of "Adventure Time" and chases big ideas right out of the gate. It's mind-blowing in the best possible way.

Every episode approaches sophisticated ideas while stuffing them into an astonishing psychedelic cartoon, so that "The Midnight Gospel" forces you to push beyond the distractions of its many moving parts and appreciate the substance at its core. The resulting trippy sci-fi adventure is a feast for the eyes and mind at once.

cbr said:
Netflix might live off of a binge-watch model, but The Midnight Gospel is a show that resists binging. It's just too much sensory overload to take in more than an episode or two at a time. The visual comedy of the animation is often delightful, but it takes a lot of effort to follow both the fast-paced trippy action and the rambling, often heavy podcast discussions. You're not going to find the same character connections and consistent world-building that made Adventure Time's absurdity more easily digestible, and the show's inconsistent nature might test some viewers' patience.

The Midnight Gospel is not a show you can easily make judgments on. Its overwhelming style and experimental inconsistencies will hold it back from connecting immediately with all viewers. But any experiment that can create an episode as beautiful as [the season finale] "Mouse of Silver" has to be doing something right. It's not the Second Coming of Adventure Time, but it's totally unique and provides plenty of deep food for thought.

comicbook said:
Overall, I'm not quite sure if I enjoyed watching The Midnight Gospel, but I absolutely can't stop thinking about it. And maybe the point isn't to like it, but to chew on it, anyway? It's not like the interview subject matter is light reading material -- there's a whole episode about ceremonial magic and Eastern traditions -- and the animation flies by at a pace where new, fantastical environments, characters, and obstacles are introduced practically every minute. The Midnight Gospel made me laugh, think hard thoughts about things I never have, and contrary to many other shows, I can already imagine myself returning to Clancy and his strange, imperfect spacecast multiple times in the future.

7XtKyRK.jpg
 
Last edited:

Yataran

Member
Jul 17, 2018
439
Copenhagen, DK
Very interesting... I have to take a look.

By the way, a pity that Adventure Time was removed from Netflix this month, at least where I live. There were only three seasons, but I had never seen it before and I really enjoyed it.
 

Jimnymebob

Member
Oct 26, 2017
19,639
Mentioning early Adventure Time has me interested, because I dropped off that super hard when it became more story and lore based, and less episode of the week randomness.
 
OP
OP
RatskyWatsky

RatskyWatsky

Are we human or are we dancer?
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,931
Another positive review:

ReadySteadyCut said:
A strange melange of intergalactic planet hopping and thoughtful discussion about the human condition. The Midnight Gospel has plenty to say and lingers long in the memory
 

Arkestry

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,920
London
Really enjoyed the first episode, felt a hell of a lot more loose than I was expecting though, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.
 

Borgus

Member
Apr 14, 2020
734
Toronto
Three episodes in and I'm digging it more and more. I'm loving these bizarre animated scenarios too.
The meat grinder stuff was a trip. Happy 4/20!
 

Bananastand

Member
Oct 26, 2017
1,430
Netflix know what they are doing releasing this on 4/20.

I will check this out though. Adventure Time was great and this looks right up my alley
 

PaulloDEC

Visited by Knack
Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,424
Australia
Only about 10 mins into the first episode and I'm already thinking this isn't for me. It reminds me of those Youtube videos where people take a piece of a conversation from a podcast and then animate it, only in this case they're greatly overestimated how interesting their conversation is going to be for people other than themselves.

I'm not sure being a fan of Adventure Time makes you more likely to enjoy this.
 

Ravelle

Member
Oct 31, 2017
17,806
Watching episode 1.

It's like watching one of those sections of a podcast being animated by fans, instead what's being said isn't related what they're doing at all haha.

The rambling also reminds me a lot of Excel Saga, also very exhausting.
 

Ravelle

Member
Oct 31, 2017
17,806
Only about 10 mins into the first episode and I'm already thinking this isn't for me. It reminds me of those Youtube videos where people take a piece of a conversation from a podcast and then animate it, only in this case they're greatly overestimated how interesting their conversation is going to be for people other than themselves.

I'm not sure being a fan of Adventure Time makes you more likely to enjoy this.

Oh damn, you beat me to it haha.
 

Ghostswillpass

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
239
Just finished the second episode and I absolutely adore this show.

Even though it has a lot of chaotic energy and is complete sensory overload, I find it quite a meditative experience.
 

HotHamBoy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
16,423
Hoping it's better than Bravest Warriors which i felt was a pretty underwhelming follow-up to AT
 

SatoAilDarko

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,824
So looking it up these are just sections from a podcast put to animation that has barely anything to do with what is said. It really shows.

II would prefer a version with dialogue and just music to go with the visuals.
 

PaulloDEC

Visited by Knack
Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,424
Australia
So looking it up these are just sections from a podcast put to animation that has barely anything to do with what is said. It really shows.

II would prefer a version with dialogue and just music to go with the visuals.

Oh. Well at least I know not to waste any more time on it.

Knowing that they literally just animated bits of a podcast makes it feel even more self-indulgent than it already did.
 

Haribo

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
979
So looking it up these are just sections from a podcast put to animation that has barely anything to do with what is said. It really shows.

II would prefer a version with dialogue and just music to go with the visuals.
Wow. That explains the very brief clip of two dudes standing behind mics at the end of the trailer. One looked like Pendelton Ward
 

HStallion

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
62,262
I got a chuckle out of the fact the main guy sticks his head into a giant vagina to travel to the simulated universes.
 

Agent 47

Banned
Jun 24, 2018
1,840
Man what a disappoitment, it's just a podcast with completely unrelated visuals on top. Was hoping for a more mature version of Adventure Time, like it was advertised as.
 

HStallion

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
62,262
Finished the first episode and I do agree with people that it feels like a cool idea that is failed by the execution. As someone who loves season 3 of Castlevania because it allows for a lot of world building, character exploration and long scenes of dialogue and only dialogue I felt the whole animating a podcast as the majority of the content, at least for the bit I watched, was rather lackluster. Its not even like the conversation about drugs and stuff was all that interesting.
 

XenodudeX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,892
Jacksonville, Florida
Watching the first episode now, and yeah its basically those game grump animation videos on YouTube. I mean, like those, but i was really hoping for an adventure time for adults. I dunno, I'm kind of disappointed.
 

HStallion

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
62,262
Watching the first episode now, and yeah its basically those game grump animation videos on YouTube. I mean, like those, but i was really hoping for an adventure time for adults. I dunno, I'm kind of disappointed.

I actually wouldn't mind this if the conversations were something more interesting or related to the idea behind the show itself. The entire drug conversation with the President is actually an interesting topic but it just feels really out of place with the premise of the series especially after he's going to various simulated worlds. Was expecting a topic that was a bit more heady or out there. I will check out more episodes but I was left feeling let down after the first.
 

Deleted member 3294

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,973
Only about 10 mins into the first episode and I'm already thinking this isn't for me. It reminds me of those Youtube videos where people take a piece of a conversation from a podcast and then animate it, only in this case they're greatly overestimated how interesting their conversation is going to be for people other than themselves.

I'm not sure being a fan of Adventure Time makes you more likely to enjoy this.
Apparently each episode is based on an episode of Duncan Trussell's podcast. Which I guess means them literally animating to clips from that podcast.
 
Last edited:

ara

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,024
So it's just an animated podcast thing? Huh. Pretty damn disappointed about that, not gonna lie.
 

Akahige

Member
Oct 27, 2017
253
This show is real pleasant surprise.
Apparently each episode is based on an episode of Duncan Trussell's podcast. Which I guess means them literally animating to clips from that podcast.
Makes sense. Love the dialogue and exchanges but clearly it has shit all to do with what is going on on the screen.
 

Herne

Member
Dec 10, 2017
5,319
Found it very boring and didn't finish the episode. So, not for me.

Who is Dr. Drew and why does everyone seem to know who he is?
 

Jakenbakin

Member
Jun 17, 2018
11,842
That was something.

I know someone planning to watch it when they next do shrooms. I need to warn them asap that watching the second episode might drive then crazy.
 

Jest

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,565
Found it very boring and didn't finish the episode. So, not for me.

Who is Dr. Drew and why does everyone seem to know who he is?

A Doctor who is "an Addiction Medicine Specialist" that hosted a late night call in radio show locally in Los Angeles called Loveline. It was all about helping people with relationship problems. It went nationally syndicated and then eventually had a short lived MTV TV Show as well. He then hosted a pretty expoitative Reality Show featuring Celebs going to his rehab clinic. And now he does podcasts mostly with occasional "news" talking head appearances.

Most recently he's known as one of the famous Dr's who claimed Covid-19 was being blown out of proportion by "the media." Apparently he apologized for that and urged people to follow Dr Fauci's advice/instruction but the damage is done.

~~~~~~~

On Topic: I watched the first couple of episodes last night and... as much as I wanted to really be into it... it's not my thing. As it's been said in the thread a few times, each episode is basically a podcast conversation with random animation drawn that has nothing to do with it. The characters in the show are having the conversations but in almost complete disconnect from what's happening on screen. I say almost because there are a few moments in each conversation that *do* directly match the animation but only to sell the illusion.

I can't speak to the "sophistication" (as one reviewer quote in the OP put it) of every conversation but the two episodes I did watch weren't sophisticated or deep at all. The opening episode in particular was reminiscent of a Joe Rogan Podcast drug conversation and while that may appeal to some it was a hard miss for me. Not because I have any particularly strong stance against drugs but because it's not really all that interesting and hasn't been since I was 15. The conversation in the second episode was a little better but its most interesting aspects didn't really center around the main topic but instead were the moments of the interviewee's life.

Overall... I just can't see myself spending my time with it. As a visual show it really doesn't interest me in the slightest and as a podcast, I'd rather spend that time being entertained. Nothing I watched from the show was intellectually stimulating or thought provoking on any significant level so it's a miss for me on that aspect as well.
 

rude

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,812
the dialogue is almost completely incongruous from what's happening on screen. This is kind of awful.