Traditional is done in the US for a whileCan we go back to animation? Was The Princess and the Frog really the last one?
Traditional is done in the US for a whileCan we go back to animation? Was The Princess and the Frog really the last one?
Review published in Turun Sanomat, the third largest daily newspaper in Finland:
Quick translations of the highlighted parts:
The new version of 1994's Lion King featuring real animals falls flat compared to the original.
A classic story with real actors
The new movie tells the same story, but with real animal actors.
In the new Lion King, they've made the mouths of real animals move believably in sync with the dialogue.
...that it is much more difficult to direct a real animal to give a desired performance than it is with a cartoon character.
Real animals made to talk...
So yeah, the reviewer legitimately thought that they used real animals. The paper later published a correction.
Yeh, so I went to see this again yesterday because I wanted to see it in 3D, I dozed off pretty quickly.
It's like watching planet earth with the lion king soundtrack on, I can only do it once.
I did like it, it's not the original but then again it was never my favorite Disney classic growing up. It's dedication to realism just makes it really hard to rewatch, the first time was amazing though, I just wonder how much repeat business this can do.People watching this movie when they don't even like it.
This is why this shit has replaced 2D animation.
Isn't this what basically happened when Simba and Nala were at the Hyena's den where Mufasa had to save them.I thought the forced "I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS!" girl fight thing was dumb as well. If they wanted to do that why not have Nala actually do something to the hyena back in the day to make her angry, long term booking have baby Nala swipe at her when they were surrounded or something to insinuate they have a feud.
Watched lion king again, and it clicked about the direction for less "emotive" lions. we're watching lions and animals doing animal things, and the english we hear is just like, "translated".
multiple times in the movie when they talk they have lion growls or roars under the speaking, so the lack of "emotive" expressions is just like looking at a real lion or cat. makes sense now.
maybe cats and lions do sing in their "language" which we don't understand. I think it works for the direction it went.
The 2019 is just as rewatchable as 1994 imo, and being able to watch both is pretty cool.
Didnt know it couldnt suspend belief. Cmon now.A Lion becoming vegan with his warthog and meerkat posse and being lectured by a wise old baboon isn't exactly just watching animals do animal things.
(haven't seen the 2019 one yet, just assuming that part wasn't cut since its supposed to be almost a 1:1 movie)
Isn't this what basically happened when Simba and Nala were at the Hyena's den where Mufasa had to save them.
Dark Phoenix was great.Before anyone says "But the audience reviews are fresh, that must mean it's good right?"
Remember that even Dark Phoenix got a fresh audience score.
Same reaction from my wife and I.Watched lion king again, and it clicked about the direction for less "emotive" lions. we're watching lions and animals doing animal things, and the english we hear is just like, "translated".
multiple times in the movie when they talk they have lion growls or roars under the speaking, so the lack of "emotive" expressions is just like looking at a real lion or cat. makes sense now.
maybe cats and lions do sing in their "language" which we don't understand. I think it works for the direction it went.
The 2019 is just as rewatchable as 1994 imo, and being able to watch both is pretty cool.
Edit: I also think being a cat owner helps understand the movie a bit more since the body language of the lions are very similar to real cats. You pick up on various things just from that. It hit my girlfriend hard for Mufasa more so than the 94 version. I also admit it hit me a little harder seeing simba try to lay with him. (But the fall itself was ironically funny to me in this version)
This is basically how I feel after seeing it tonight, except I'd say the animals should've emoted quite a bit more.Just got back from it. Saw the original like... 20 years ago?
Movie was good, but they needed to emote the animals just a littttttttle bit more to hit that sweet spot of Planet Earth meets characters with human tendencies. This was really needed during super emotional scenes where actors were crying or yelling out in anguish, but the faces stayed pretty plain.
Timon and Pumbaa were by far the best part and I would legit watch a spinoff Disney+ series starring Rogen and Eichner.
Pretty sure it was. Nala does something to try and protect Simba and they have an interaction that the later scene is a pay off for.Did it? I don't remember. But yea that would be the spot to put Nala doing something to her if it wasn't.
Yeah it's been dropping in the past week along with it's average...it's doing worse than I thought.
I know it won't dip below 50 but that's pretty appalling numbers for this.Yeah it's been dropping in the past week along with it's average...it's doing worse than I thought.
I expected much better, this is pretty crazy.I know it won't dip below 50 but that's pretty appalling numbers for this.
Maybe they limited Beyoncé's screen time because they too realized that she was shit.The appeal was seeing realistic lions and I'd say it did it's job for me. John Oliver should have never attempted to sing and Beyonce really was underused for being such a big name attached to the movie, Seth Rogen and Billy Eichner had way more to do.
The appeal was seeing realistic lions and I'd say it did it's job for me. John Oliver should have never attempted to sing and Beyonce really was underused for being such a big name attached to the movie, Seth Rogen and Billy Eichner had way more to do.
Beyonce was used more in this version than her character in the original - to a fault.
The worst part of her performance was her attempts to deliver the new, yet crappy dialog - especially in the 3rd act. Whenever they stuck closer to the source material , she was actually fine.
Same reaction from my wife and I.
The realistic version of Simba made it harder.
And I have a cat too. That's what I've been trying to say several times. People focus too much on the faces and don't see the body language.
I'm also a little LTTP but ... can we talk about the sequence where Simba's tuff of hair reaches Rafiki?
W.T.F!
It felt like an SNL gag: it went on for way too long including travelling through - of all things - giraffe dung!
What were the writers thinking??
That sucked, but more or less the whole movie was like that. Cut or shorten something that was good in the original and replace it with some filler that adds nothing, butcher the originals GOAT score just to add a generic Beyonce song etc.I'm also a little LTTP but ... can we talk about the sequence where Simba's tuff of hair reaches Rafiki?
W.T.F!
It felt like an SNL gag: it went on for way too long including travelling through - of all things - giraffe dung!
What were the writers thinking??
A bit late to the party to this one. Long story short is that everyone involved with this remake should be ashamed. The directing, the script, the voice acting, the score, everything was much worse than the original. Shit, I don't think they would be able to make a worse version even if they tried.
I'm also a little LTTP but ... can we talk about the sequence where Simba's tuff of hair reaches Rafiki?
W.T.F!
It felt like an SNL gag: it went on for way too long including travelling through - of all things - giraffe dung!
What were the writers thinking??