Official Staff Communication
The fact that there is a segment of the GOP that is willing to go against the bulk of the party is a newsworthy, and quite unusual, thing. However, we don't need threads for the ads (or tweets) themselves.
If a reputable news article arises on their existence and the work that they do, feel free to post that. They can also come up as discussion in US politics threads, as they are relevant to the current election. But the threads created about the ads (or tweets) themselves lead to little productive discussion. Legitimate concerns have also been raised about endorsing them given the individuals behind them, so those threads will be locked going forward.
The staff have been listening to all feedback (as there are marginalized voices on both sides of this debate, some of whom want to discuss the ads (or tweets)) and we believe this is a good compromise that takes all concerns into account. If you have any further concerns, please reach out to staff.
If a reputable news article arises on their existence and the work that they do, feel free to post that. They can also come up as discussion in US politics threads, as they are relevant to the current election. But the threads created about the ads (or tweets) themselves lead to little productive discussion. Legitimate concerns have also been raised about endorsing them given the individuals behind them, so those threads will be locked going forward.
The staff have been listening to all feedback (as there are marginalized voices on both sides of this debate, some of whom want to discuss the ads (or tweets)) and we believe this is a good compromise that takes all concerns into account. If you have any further concerns, please reach out to staff.