Why? I refuse to accept half-assed agreement with, frankly, proto-fascism (or the equivalent, quisling, whataboutism).
Why? I refuse to accept half-assed agreement with, frankly, proto-fascism (or the equivalent, quisling, whataboutism).
No problems with the Lincoln Project. They're doing something. You, not so much.Are you with the Lincoln Project? Starting to understand the results they got if that's the case
Because you are derailing the thread and accusing people of being fascist for some reasons.Why? I refuse to accept half-assed agreement with, frankly, proto-fascism (or the equivalent, quisling, whataboutism).
And there it is.No problems with the Lincoln Project. They're doing something. You, not so much.
Why? I refuse to accept half-assed agreement with, frankly, proto-fascism (or the equivalent, quisling, whataboutism).
No problems with the Lincoln Project. They're doing something. You, not so much.
if absorbing millions of dollars is doing something, I should have done something for the Biden campaignNo problems with the Lincoln Project. They're doing something. You, not so much.
Yeah, they're doing something. Helping republicans and making millions off grifting desperate liberalsNo problems with the Lincoln Project. They're doing something. You, not so much.
did you not see those numbers? republican support of trump has been higher this cycle. tell me what they did?No problems with the Lincoln Project. They're doing something. You, not so much.
did you not see those numbers? republican support of trump has been higher this cycle. tell me what they did?
No, you really can't.I mean, you could argue that without them Rep support would be even higher.
Exactly. The problem are the deaf ears, not the message.I guess the mistake is expecting Republican voters to have a modicum of human and democratic values.
What I want to know is if anyone thinks pandering to this group of Future Former Republicans was worth alienating the left.
Oh the entirety of DNC donors thinks it was very well worth the effort.What I want to know is if anyone thinks pandering to this group of Future Former Republicans was worth alienating the left.
No matter what I may think about the Lincoln project. It's really dumb in my opinion to write an article about election results and voting tendencies when we're pretty far from getting all this data. Especially when the data being used to make claims here is exit polls, which especially this year are basically useless.
I mean the whole defenses force was about taking the never trumpers and it barely budged republicans. So nah, this is a proper article.
Did they really alienate, though? I think their ads were not bothersome to anyone. If instead of Lincoln project it would've said justice democrats at the end of their ads nobody would've batted an eye. The frustrating part, indeed, is people donating them money. If right wingers want to go after Trump I'm fine with it but they should put their own money.What I want to know is if anyone thinks pandering to this group of Future Former Republicans was worth alienating the left.
You're not following me here.Did they really alienate, though? I think their ads were not bothersome to anyone. If instead of Lincoln project it would've said justice democrats at the end of their ads nobody would've batted an eye. The frustrating part, indeed, is people donating them money. If right wingers want to go after Trump I'm fine with it but they should put their own money.
I'm saying we literally do not have the data and results to even make the assertion on whether this succeeded or not. That;'s my argument. And even if we did have the data the article is relying on, I don't know how we would prove this argument. The Lincoln project is such a small part of the overall equation here, and there are so many other factors. It's just a bad argument.
the premises is built around the effectiveness of a 40 million dollar ad campaign on swaying republicans. As it stands now it was not effective, at all. Its not being treated as core piece or some cornerstone, just a simple observation. Their whole intention was to sway votes (as claimed by liberals) and votes did not sway.
As I said, we don't have the data yet to even know if votes were swayed. And even if we did have the data the core arguement is flawed, because there's no real way to figure out, just by looking at vote percentages if a political ad campaign ran by a firm was successful, because there are a whole ton of reasons why people vote the way they do. Therefore one cannot simply compare the percentage of votes in a direction four years ago, for completely different candidates in a completely different political climate, from votes made today, and then pull out one small factor and presume its place in the overall result. One could even make the argument that, who knows, the percentage of republicans voting for Biden would have been even worse that where it ended up, if not for the Lincoln project. Now that's not my argument, I'm simply saying this to point out that we don't know. Not to mention that 40 million dollars is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the ad spending this cycle. A single senate seat can have more than 280 million dollars spent on it in ads.
In fairness to the Lincoln Project, the $67 million they raised probably wouldn't have done much to help the group of Dem Senate candidates who all lost by double digits despite raising a quarter of a billion dollars
Hard for me to take this seriously when nearly a quarter million people have died this year because of Trump's abject policy failures on covid.Seventy-three percent of voters said their candidate's positions on the issues were more important in their vote for president than their candidate's personal qualities.
Those are all exit polls, which means they are a representation of the people who actually went to a polling place yesterday. This is an atypical year with a ton of early/absentee voting, the exit polls don't show us the true composition of Trump's electorate since in person voting this year skews conservative.I think it's a bit early to be declaring that they had no effect one way or another when all the voted haven't even been tallied. But even so, the entire goal of TLP (and groups like Republican Voters Against Trump) was to try to sway like 1% of Republican voters into switch to Biden; just enough to cost Trump his victory.
What no one expected was that Trump would run up the margins everywhere else. If the posts everyone was sharing last night were correct and Trump gained 2-3 points with all ethnicities, but lost 5 with white males, I'd suggest that shows him losing a small amount of the traditional Republican base compared to 2016 (white men)...But not enough to overcome the new voters Trump picked up.
Still, it's probably too early to be doing any post-mortems, as much of an easy target as TLP is to blame on Biden's lack of a blowout for some.