The question is, will the title be completely new, like "The Legend of Zelda: The New Title" or will it be titled so that you know it's a direct sequel to BOTW so it's like "Breath of the Wild: The New Title"?
The question is, will the title be completely new, like "The Legend of Zelda: The New Title" or will it be titled so that you know it's a direct sequel to BOTW so it's like "Breath of the Wild: The New Title"?
Of course it has to be the same Link, but he might be experiencing the past hero's memories to find out how to seal Ganon and gain knowledge and learn to use the arm to defeat him. The game might allow you to face Ganon straight from the start without any of the powers you might learn during the game.
Game begins -> Zelda disappears (probably corrupted and posessed by Ganon) -> Link "fuses" with arm -->
- Option 1: Face Ganon inmediately, maybe unlocking a new ending where you don't seal Ganon but defeat him. Hard mode / speedrun mode
- Option 2: Learn to use powers and learn about how to defeat/seal Ganon by experiencing the hero of the past's memories
Oh, yeah, not happening. Zelda will be forever the damsel in distress. (Which has to change, not just because there is so much potential there, but because it's kinda fair to do so)It would be the former most likely, doing The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild: As Above So Below would be to long.
Oh of course that is possible, I'm just pointing it out to the people who hoped it was somehow Zelda.
Why would they say they're 'aiming for 2022' if it was scheduled for Q1? If that was the case they wouldn't have used such loose wording.
The question is, will the title be completely new, like "The Legend of Zelda: The New Title" or will it be titled so that you know it's a direct sequel to BOTW so it's like "Breath of the Wild: The New Title"?
I think so too, it's not gonna be a botw title, the same way Majoras Mask wasn't "The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time: Majora's Mask"Legend of Zelda: Title. It's a Zelda game, not a Breath of the Wild game. There's no game franchise owned by Nintendo called "Breath of the Wild"
I hope you're right!It may be wishful thinking, but I don't think it's unreasonable to think any time in 2022 is up for grabs.
Ah, so you did. Oops!
Yeah, I should clarify that billboarding alone wouldn't be so convincing. The reason they're able to pull it off is because the imposters can receive direct illumination and the cloud materials are properly shaded in a way that conveys depth from said illumination. Your mind is using the lighting information and interpreting it as a depth cue, and the illusion should work well enough for most people. However, the illusion breaks down for me because when I see the camera angle change, I notice that the rotational parallax of the clouds compared the the background of very consistent with that of camera facing quads; it's too uniform, and at no point does any part of any cloud geometrically obstruct other parts of itself.
A good way to think about this is to compare a head on view with a view that progressively moves overhead. The bottom of a truly three dimensional cloud should eventually become obstructed from view, but it's clear in the following examples that that doesn't happen:
This is a clear sign of billboarding to me, even though the shading is excellent at conveying depth.
Nevertheless, the clouds still look really good!
The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
Hero of the Skies? Islands of the Sky?
Yeah, bear in mind we weren't even given any release timeline at E3 2016, and the last estimate provided was "2017" in Nintendo's March 2016 fiscal report that year. Then, 2 months out, they drop the final trailer and release date. It is quite possible (probable, even) that the game could still launch in early 2022.Probably because it's Zelda and even if they are aiming for a Q1 release and have an internal date for March they aren't 100% confident ~9 months out about it still and know that a potential delay for this kind of game is still high and could be far more than just a few weeks or a month but could be an entire quarter or two depending on the blocker. So a generic 2022 gives them more leeway and not having to worry about publicly announcing a delay. It may be wishful thinking, but I don't think it's unreasonable to think any time in 2022 is up for grabs. Otherwise we could just turn your question on its head and say why not just say releasing second half of 2022 if Q1/2 is not on the table at all already.
Im leaning towards the latter.The question is, will the title be completely new, like "The Legend of Zelda: The New Title" or will it be titled so that you know it's a direct sequel to BOTW so it's like "Breath of the Wild: The New Title"?
I'm betting that this is somehow a central mechanic of the game. Seems like Nintendo likes to borrow elements from remasters/remakes developed in parallel with new titles.Seriously, people that never played SS don't know how awesome the Lanayru section was with the timeshift stones.
I don't see them keeping BOTW in the title. They are just saying "botw sequel" because that just sells so much. You would want to capitalize on the success of botw until you reveal the proper title.Im leaning towards the latter.
They've called it 'sequel to the breath of the wild' twice now over the span of 2 years.
It will be strange if they left the BOTW branding off the game.
It's their biggest most successful Zelda game, I think they will milk that branding and also for the practical reason its a continuation of the BOTW narrative.
The question is, will the title be completely new, like "The Legend of Zelda: The New Title" or will it be titled so that you know it's a direct sequel to BOTW so it's like "Breath of the Wild: The New Title"?
Some treehouse guy on an interview said the game has a title, but they havent revealed because it could let people know what happens in the story, its not gonna be called anything Breath of the wild...
I like this theory :-) and time travel has been done before in Zelda games and BotW had a ruined Temple of Time in it. So the pieces are there for some sort of time travel shenanigans.Is this gonna be some timeloop shenanigans where Link and Zelda from BOTW are actually the hero and princess from 10,000 years ago and BOTW Link leaves his arm sealed with Ganondorf so his future self can find it 10,000 years later?
It has a 5 year development cycle and a team of over 1000 people working on it. I'm pretty certain it won't feel like DLC.
Don't feed the trollIt has a 5 year development cycle and a team of over 1000 people working on it. I'm pretty certain it won't feel like DLC.
The question is, will the title be completely new, like "The Legend of Zelda: The New Title" or will it be titled so that you know it's a direct sequel to BOTW so it's like "Breath of the Wild: The New Title"?
I think there's a distinct possibility it might be some other worldly/heavenly plane/dream world. Good a guess as any right now. Green is the color of the day for BotW2, representing life, courage and the spiritual aspect of the Triforce. BotW was all about blue and Wisdom aspect with technology and stuff of the Sheikah. So something like a dream or spirit world doesn't seem that far out of the question. Not like Zelda series hasn't had alternate realms before.Maybe instead of actually going to visit floating areas in the sky, maybe the split will be more like real world and "dream world", which would maybe also explain the change in clothing and hair.
The picture above is obviously a nod to Skyward Sword, it's just fun to theorise.
I am surprised to see the trailer mentioned even on the BBC:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-57484727
Prob no focus on narative, not what Zelda games are about usually.Hope it focuses more on the narrative and characters this time around and offer (truly) rewarding exploration and rewarding systemic gameplay pieces.
It does look a bit too similar to BOTW to me and you could have fooled me this is BOTW 1 if I didn't know it any better. Previous main Zelda games were always very distinctive in style and locations.
I'm not blown away. I still think it's possible for them deliver something I might enjoy.
It's a terrible theory. BotW Link has always had long hair. That's the only way he'd be able to wear it in a ponytail.Seen some theories floating around that long haired "Link" is actually Ganon from forever ago when he was a hero. I think that's a great theory.
Seen some theories floating around that long haired "Link" is actually Ganon from forever ago when he was a hero. I think that's a great theory.
It's also terrible. I expect the absolute worst from Nintendo when it comes to diversity and cultural sensitivity. So it falls in line that they have you play as Ganon from before he was corrupted by malice or whatever, and of course, he is white. We'll get to see the fall of Ganon which will eventually lead to his skin darkening and him looking more like Ganon from past iterations. Of course, as everyone knows, the darker your skin gets the more evil and corrupted you are.
Oh and Zelda ain't gonna be playable. You play as Link in the current timeline and whitewashed Ganon in the sky area. Hurray!
They both have the same arm thing and links hair depends on his clothes anyway.There is definitely something suspicious about the sky Link having a lot of new features (new haircut, new clothes, visible weird arm and tattoos) and the ground Link looking copy pasted from BotW except for new item/runes.
But don't you get it??? The parallel between Link and Ganon! They both looked similar and heroic and white before Ganon was corrupted by evil darkness. This is how we get you to sympathize with the villain!I really really doubt Nintendo is having people play as Ganon in this game. Especially not one who looks nearly identical to Link.