What on earth is challenging and deep about this writing? Please give me examples because I'm not seeing it. All the story really has to say is that
Violence is bad, revenge is a never ending cycle. It takes every opportunity to force the player to do horrible things to people or animals and then play a scene or show you a journal entry about said person or animal to guilt you into feeling horrible for your actions.
There's nothing new or interesting about these tropes. They've been done to death in video games and the only stuff that might be considered "challenging" to the players views is little more than cheap emotional manipulation.
I can't really go in to it without going in on spoilers, and I can't really be bothered talking about it and spoiler tagging everything.
And I was not talking about the overarching story arc since I can't comment on that since I've only played roughly 6 hours. I was talking about "the big thing".
And I never said it was deep, I think they approach the story telling in a kind of new way, they take chances and I can understand that people are pissed they are used to the devs serving up fan service, I think ND took a huge risk, they could have pleased everyone. But people are allowed to have their opinion, but the review bombing is just sad and pathetic since most of the 0 is the usual suspects.
But since I can't really go in to what I like about it without spoiling and so on I'll save it for down the road.
I dunno why people are still getting upset over the review bombing. If you like the game it has absolutely zero impact on your enjoyment or opinion of the game. On top of that, it's given you guys a built in defense, which many of you have been more than happy to use, again, to completely dismiss any criticism and vilify the people who have complaints. It is exactly like TLJ (great movie) and Ghostbusters (fucking garbage) and every other piece of media that gets swept up in this culture war, where valid criticism is constantly drowned out. Literally nothing about the things I dislike with TLoU 2 have ANYTHING to do with ANY of the usual controversy, and yet every time I see these threads it's people talking out of both sides of their mouths with this "supposedly sincere" and "it's ok to dislike, but" nonsense.
The only people the review bombing actually effects are people who don't think it's the greatest thing ever. If you're a 10/10 super fan you've plenty of people who will gladly support your opinion. If you're a piece of shit giving games a 0/10 on Metacritic, you've got plenty of people who will support your idiotic cause. If you're a person who doesn't like the game that you've played up to this point, you get labeled an alt-righter, a homophobe, a transphobe, a console warrior from one side and a hundred variations of a cuck for even buying it on the other.
No, nobody is saying you're a nazi for disliking the game, no one. We are talking about the people who review bomb it because it fits their agenda.
If you don't like the game that's totally fine, don't worry about it. I didn't like TLJ that much and no one have called me any names.
Last edited: