A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
I said it's like saying. I never said that they don't have a bunch of ports and one or two niches.DId you miss my 1st post in this thread?
They have games on Switch.
Another weak argument.
it won't, but 5 to 7 million is completely doable, which is more than most games do on most platforms (even games that are way more expensive to make)A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think.
A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
That's what's weird about this thread and the handful of posters on here that continue to whine about this topic. Not only is there a MH game on the platform, it's a great game as well.Generations filled that gap for me, thankfully I didn't play it much on 3DS.
If y'all want to port-beg while ignoring numbers then then do you. Hopefully Nintendo cuts that check again so you'll get your wish.
That's what's weird about this thread and the handful of posters on here that continue to whine about this topic. Not only is there a MH game on the platform, it's a great game as well.
Apparently that's not good enough though.
If y'all want to port-beg while ignoring numbers then then do you. Hopefully Nintendo cuts that check again so you'll get your wish.
That's what's weird about this thread and the handful of posters on here that continue to whine about this topic.
port-beg for what, exactly? i guess you can call it new game-begging, but that happens like a hundred times every day on this forum, people asking for new games in their favorite series for whatever platform. why does it bother people when it's for a new MH on switch?If y'all want to port-beg while ignoring numbers then then do you. Hopefully Nintendo cuts that check again so you'll get your wish.
Well I own Generations Ultimate so maybe the individuals you're referring to should check out the game. It even goes on sale quite often. :)The only one whining ist the one who's begging to stop the conversation, because the Just the idea of Monster Hunter on a Nintendo system seems to hurt someones feelings.
I will because that's what it is.port-beg for what, exactly? i guess you can call it new game-begging, but that happens like a hundred times every day on this forum, people asking for new games in their favorite series for whatever platform. why does it bother people when it's for a new MH on switch?
A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
Pretty much every game Capcom has put on Switch has sold favorably compared to other platforms. I doubt the inevitable Team Portable/Generations MH5 based title will be any different.The switch is a definite success no doubt but outside of indies I don't really see 3rd parties setting the charts on fire. It's dominated by Nintendo published games.
That's ludicrous. World has sold >15m copies and is on 3 platforms.A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
Well I own Generations Ultimate so maybe the individuals you're referring to should check out the game. It even goes on sale quite often. :)
No way lolA Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
What a silly post.A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
The Switch isn't unstoppable get over yourselfA Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think. Though its not that hard to figure out why it hasnt happened, Capcom doesnt have infinite dev teams.
How many of those Resident Evil games are Switch exclusive? Or exclusive to any platform, for that matter....and? Capcom has multiple RE games in development simultaneously. If anything, the greatly increased profile of Monster Hunter suggests that we'll get more MH games in the future, not fewer.
It's weird using this as a reason we won't see a Switch game, when it's generally agreed that MHW2 is a next-gen title that is years away. 15 million sales, and Capcom's just going to let the series lie dormant until MHW2?
Because Capcom would not be choosing to support handhelds over home console, it would be making a handheld MH in addition to its huge 10M+ home console entries. It's not an either or situation, which some people seem to find very hard to understand. Capcom can have its cake and eat it, too. You will get your beautiful next-gen console MHW 2 with 4K and raytracing or whatever in 2021 or 2022. Why can't Capcom put out another MH for handhelds in the interim?MHW sale makes it clear that there are bigger MH market outside handheld. Why should Capcom move the franchise back to handheld? If anything, the Switch might get the downgraded port of whatever the next gen Monster Hunter is. The day of handheld exclusive Monster Hunter is over.
Nobody is talking about 'moving the franchise back to handheld' or 'handheld exclusive MH'. The discussion is about whether the multiple teams Capcom has can put an entry on Switch in addition to, and without affecting, any possible (and let's face it inevitable) sequel to MHW's awesome success found on multiplat.MHW sale makes it clear that there are bigger MH market outside handheld. Why should Capcom move the franchise back to handheld? If anything, the Switch might get the downgraded port of whatever the next gen Monster Hunter is. The day of handheld exclusive Monster Hunter is over.
Not sure if serious or trolling but that's how many lobbies GU can display at once. It doesn't mean that's how many there actually are. By the same metric, World can only display 18 lobbies at one time (on PC at least), is that how many actual lobbies there are?GenU happened and day 1 with free online at the time had a nearly dead community online. Around 3-4 pages of lobbies or 12-20 lobbies. Just give it up with this Switch begging shit already, damn. If it happens, it happens.
Because Capcom would not be choosing to support handhelds over home console, it would be making a handheld MH in addition to its huge 10M+ home console entries. It's not an either or situation, which some people seem to find very hard to understand. Capcom can have its cake and eat it, too. You will get your beautiful next-gen console MHW 2 with 4K and raytracing or whatever in 2021 or 2022. Why can't Capcom put out another MH for handhelds in the interim?
Can they? If they could we would have MHW on Switch by now.
why does that matter when a potential MH on switch can outsell a multiplatform RE? does it make a difference if the sales come from one or multiple platforms?How many of those Resident Evil games are Switch exclusive? Or exclusive to any platform, for that matter.
Because there's no fragmentation, there's already a secondary design team in place and pretty obviously working on something. This is the team that made Portable 3rd and Generations.Why should Capcom fragment their development teams to make 2 different games when they can just port the same game to the Switch? It will cost far less money for them and Switch owners will run out to buy the port anyway.
MH Switch graphically will be the PS360 Monster Hunter that never was :)I don't know how many years folks were saying how good monster hunter would do on ps3, it was sad because I was one of them. And so many others said no way, it usually devolved into port begging.
What other third party Switch games have easily sold more than 18mil? (15mil if you don't count Iceborne)A Monster Hunter on the Switch would easily outsell world I think.
If it's going to play like the new ones let the console centric fans keep it.
BingoThat you need to combine the sales of Capcoms best selling game on 3 different systems to somehow argue that a potential 5-7 million seller isn't worth the effort, just demonstrates that it actually ist very viable. Or are you really trying to tell us that selling similar to the MHW SKU on Switch is somehow a weak performance? That's similar to What mainline Resident Evil games sell on several systems combined. Adding a Switch version to their multiplatform strategy, just means adding an additional userbase, one that is similarly successful as PS4 as a whole and actually relevant in Japan, as your potential audience. And even If it's the revived portable series as a console exclusives on Switch, they can still add a PC SKU.
That is a terrible analogy. Nintendo needs to provide different experiences for people to want their console. Capcom only needs to make money, there's no reason for them to do B if they can do A and make more money (especially when both games would be from the same franchise).It's kind of like saying "well Mario Kart outsold every Mario game ever so Nintendo should only make Mario racing games from now on".
Uh no. The correct answer is to continue to make Mario Kart and regular Mario and even 3D Mario etc. etc. etc.
That is smart business. Not the other way around.
A major Monster Hunter game on the Switch looking at the system's success worldwide and in Japan in particular I think probably has a sales potential in the range of 8-10 million copies, which would make it Capcom's 2nd highest selling game ever and probably not that far off from MHW's PS4 single platform sales.
If doing B in addition to A would be more profitable than 95% of Capcom's other projects, then yes, there's plenty of reason to do it.That is a terrible analogy. Nintendo needs to provide different experiences for people to want their console. Capcom only needs to make money, there's no reason for them to do B if they can do A and make more money (especially when both games would be from the same franchise).
Franchise fatigue is a thing. And given how many people it takes to make a game these days, having multiple teams working on the same franchise doesn't seem like the best solution (MH is no COD). They have other successful franchises waiting for new entries.If doing B in addition to A would be more profitable than 95% of Capcom's other projects, then yes, there's plenty of reason to do it.
I assure you it's not. I prefer the old style of play as it matched more with portable sensibilities (my preferred way to play). Console centric fans however like the new direction the series took and will continue to take.
they already have multiple teams working on the MH franchise.having multiple teams working on the same franchise doesn't seem like the best solution
do you wish for them to stop making new RE/DMC/whatever games as well? those won't do as well as world either, and a monster hunter game on switch would sell more than those (multiplatform) games.This is ridiculous. Monster Hunter World absolutely crushed the sales of any previous game in the franchise, so now they should go back and make an exclusive entry on a weaker console? In my opinion, part of the reason it broke out in such a big way in the west was the technical leap Capcom were able to make, so going back to Switch would negate that in a big way. Truthfully I also think the games just appeal more to the kind of audience you find on Xbox and PlayStation (in the west of course, not Japan). There's no chance a Switch followup would do as well as World, so why would they take that opportunity cost when they could just focus on a sequel? Not to say that one won't happen on Switch, but if it happens it's going to be a smaller budget entry with less resources put towards it, and it won't do nearly as well.
Nobody is saying 'do it instead of MHW2'. They have multiple MH teams, and even if a Switch entry only did what the 3DS games managed, it would still outsell pretty much almost everything else Capcom makes including various other multiplat IP. 'Not doing nearly as well as MHW' covers pretty much everything Capcom has ever made, but portable entries are still there in the top ten.This is ridiculous. Monster Hunter World absolutely crushed the sales of any previous game in the franchise, so now they should go back and make an exclusive entry on a weaker console? In my opinion, part of the reason it broke out in such a big way in the west was the technical leap Capcom were able to make, so going back to Switch would negate that in a big way. Truthfully I also think the games just appeal more to the kind of audience you find on Xbox and PlayStation (in the west of course, not Japan). There's no chance a Switch followup would do as well as World, so why would they take that opportunity cost when they could just focus on a sequel? Not to say that one won't happen on Switch, but if it happens it's going to be a smaller budget entry with less resources put towards it, and it won't do nearly as well.
And because of that they should ignore a 50 million and growing userbase that they probably could get 7 million in sales?This is ridiculous. Monster Hunter World absolutely crushed the sales of any previous game in the franchise, so now they should go back and make an exclusive entry on a weaker console? In my opinion, part of the reason it broke out in such a big way in the west was the technical leap Capcom were able to make, so going back to Switch would negate that in a big way. Truthfully I also think the games just appeal more to the kind of audience you find on Xbox and PlayStation (in the west of course, not Japan). There's no chance a Switch followup would do as well as World, so why would they take that opportunity cost when they could just focus on a sequel? Not to say that one won't happen on Switch, but if it happens it's going to be a smaller budget entry with less resources put towards it, and it won't do nearly as well.
They already have multiple MH teams. MHW was worked on while Generations was being made, then there's Stories, the mobile games etc etc, and yet 'franchise fatigue' didn't slow MHW down. It worked to the opposite in capitalising on hunger for MH games. This isn't a new concept.Franchise fatigue is a thing. And given how many people it takes to make a game these days, having multiple teams working on the same franchise doesn't seem like the best solution (MH is no COD). They have other successful franchises waiting for new entries.
Funny enough nobody talks about the potential franchise fatigue for RE with 4 games in 6 years.They already have multiple MH teams. MHW was worked on while Generations was being made, then there's Stories, the mobile games etc etc. This isn't a new concept.