Which has happened a lot in the last few year tbh. I disagree with the EU on this.What happens when one company wants to innovate and make a genuinely better port?
Which has happened a lot in the last few year tbh. I disagree with the EU on this.What happens when one company wants to innovate and make a genuinely better port?
Which has happened a lot in the last few year tbh. I disagree with the EU on this.
Lightning ports, USB c, micro USB? It might not seem like much but compare that to electric plug sockets staying the same for decades and decades. And electric plug sockets DO suck.
How would this significantly reduce e-waste? There's only one major company that's not on board with the standard as is. Would this increase the quality of cables across the board? Most of the ones I throw away were shitty ones that were on a usb variant, the "standard", already.
Because professionals have been leaving iPads/Macbooks for competitors,
Lightning ports, USB c, micro USB? It might not seem like much but compare that to electric plug sockets staying the same for decades and decades. And electric plug sockets DO suck.
Well actually I was thinking of the UK 3 pin plug as an example of one which is good. But US plugs scare the fuck out of me.I'll bite. What sucks about the UK 3 pin plug socket? As detailed as possible pls.
I have an exceedingly minor gripe. The pins on the UK plugs are square as opposed to round. But I do love the fuze in the connector and the robust feeling overall compared to a US outlet.I'll bite. What sucks about the UK 3 pin plug socket? As detailed as possible pls.
That might be why Apple would go cordlessI understand this argument in theory....but what would a "genuinely better port" even do better?
USB C right now supports data transfer at rates that are more than high enough for any possible use for a mobile phone. It's small enough in every dimension that it's not adding significantly to the size of a phone or wasting internal space. It's cheap for phone manufacturers to use and cheap for consumers to buy additional cables. It carries enough power to quickly charge any battery that can fit into a phone. It has the ability to carry audio and video in common display formats. It works with USB C peripherals and storage and it's backwards compatible with the infinitude of old USB devices and accessories with cheap adapters. It's highly compatible and becoming more so, and, as an added bonus, it fixes USB A's flip-flip-now-it fits issues.
Any different port is going to sacrifice at least a few of those advantages, and it's really difficult to see what improvements could be made that would be worth those sacrifices.
Didn't apple help develop USB-C and wasn't is spurred on by the lightning port?
Didn't apple help develop USB-C and wasn't is spurred on by the lightning port
Industries in cooperation with regulating create input and output or methodolgy Standards for centuries. Huh?
I'll bite. What sucks about the UK 3 pin plug socket? As detailed as possible pls.
Yes. USB-c development was announced in response to lightning, didn't ship for two years after, and wasn't ubiquitous on mobile phones for another year after that. Even now usbc is a crapshoot in terms of speed and charging capability.Lol, shit... really?
No idea... but f'real as if we're skint on examples of Apple being anti-consumer fk-heads with their propriety everything.
Can't even browse my fkn iPhone's contents ffs [ex-iPhone, like hell I use that shite anymore].
Part of the idea is that phones would no longer be bundled with chargers and cables.
They can make it available to everyone.What happens when one company wants to innovate and make a genuinely better port?
Those who are arguing against this because it would stifle innovation need to explain to me why lightning port is still usb 2.0(480mbit/s) and why it was late to the whole fast charge thing.
oh no I can't charge my phone and I'm too stupid to carry a tiny lightning cable in my bag/pocket. Tough shit
didn't the EU mandate something like this before around micro USB? Apple seemed to ignore that
the exact same thing already happened in the EU with micro USB and apple just got around it by shipping a lightning adapter.
i would love apple to switch to USB-C for real, but at this point i think lightning is so entrenched that normal people would find it much more of a pain. the prevailing headline sentiment in mainstream press would be "omg apple forces everyone to buy new iphone chargers".
The lightning port in the phone itself has planned obsolescence. As I've mentioned, I'm going through my second one with the same problem. It has bad contact.oh no I can't charge my phone and I'm too stupid to carry a tiny lightning cable in my bag/pocket. Tough shit
didn't the EU mandate something like this before around micro USB? Apple seemed to ignore that
Nearly, yes. A brief summary is that the EU looked at the proliferation of different charger types, decided that things couldn't stay like that, and told the industry that they had to either clean things up or there would be EU regulation.didn't the EU mandate something like this before around micro USB? Apple seemed to ignore that
Lighting connector pretty much screwed up iOS 13 with flash drives on my 2017 Pro. Can't even power one without a USB hub because lighting can't deliver enough power. It's a pretty dumb connector tbh when a regular USB connector many many years older than it can power and do more. So yeah, I wish the connector never even existed and they would have just stuck with what Android had.oh no I can't charge my phone and I'm too stupid to carry a tiny lightning cable in my bag/pocket. Tough shit
didn't the EU mandate something like this before around micro USB? Apple seemed to ignore that
These are the different sockets in the EU but note that Red, Green and Teal are compatible to the blue standard.
Swiss uses different variations, but the newer "Eurosocket" form factor is also compatible to the blue standard.
That leaves the UK with the only non-compatible sockets in the EU. On the other hand "leave", "UK" and "EU" are interesting keywords.
Who gives a shit about some fancy innovation when the planet is fucking dying. This can save 50tonnes of waste. Fucking go for it. In this case a lot of people would benefit from a more convenient product and less cost once there is one cable to rule them all. After a while there won't be cables being packaged in EU phones because everyone already has enough.That's essentially Apples take, that it will stifle innovation. Which is sort of true.
I know this is a joke, but it feels like it doesn't work because it's too absurd/unlikely.
How? I know that the ones most of Europe use have the small advantage of being usable with either side up, but besides that, I don't know why/how one socket would be considered superior
I know this is a joke, but it feels like it doesn't work because it's too absurd/unlikely.
How? I know that the ones most of Europe use have the small advantage of being usable with either side up, but besides that, I don't know why/how one socket would be considered superior
• Prong Design: Like standard U.S. grounded plugs, the U.K. wall plug has three prongs. But the design of these prongs makes it nearly impossible for you to shock yourself accidentally. Unlike in U.S. plugs, half of each prong is coated in insulation. Because of this, even if a plug is not fully inserted into a socket, touching the exposed part of the prongs can't give you a shock.
• Socket Design: Any kid with a fork or a screwdriver can light his hair on fire in the United States by jamming it into a wall socket. Not so in England, where it would take at least two screwdrivers to manage the same calamitous trick. The U.K. plug is designed so that the grounding prong is slightly longer than the prongs responsible for transferring current. Like a tumbler in a lock, this grounding prong is responsible for "unlocking" the socket, giving access to the more dangerous live and neutral terminals.
• Built-In Fuses: During World War II, a copper shortage resulted in the British government putting fuses into every plug, instead of wiring them directly. Although the built-in fuse adds bulk to the U.K. plug design, it's also safer: In case of an unexpected electrical surge, the fuse simply blows and the electricity shuts off, preventing fires, electrocutions, and other accidents. It also makes U.K. plugs easier to fix.
• Circuit Design: Finally, there's the wiring inside the plug itself. Not only is it extremely intuitive, but it has been thoughtfully designed so that if the plug is tugged and the wiring frays, the live and neutral wires are the first to become disconnected, while the grounding wires–the ones responsible for preventing human electrocution when they come in contact with a circuit–are the last to fray.
These are the different sockets in the EU but note that Red, Green and Teal are compatible to the blue standard.
Swiss uses different variations, but the newer "Eurosocket" form factor is also compatible to the blue standard.
That leaves the UK with the only non-compatible sockets in the EU. On the other hand "leave", "UK" and "EU" are interesting keywords.
I'll bite. What sucks about the UK 3 pin plug socket? As detailed as possible pls.
UK sockets are the best anyway, from a safety point of view. Unless the plug is on the floor and you have bare feet, then your fucked.