So all reviews in progress should be banned from review topics in future?
Man, people on here really do get angry at the stupidest things lol
Don´t be ridiculous.
This "Review" thread btw has a poll asking people how they think the game is gonna review...
Completely defies the purpose of a review thread - sorry.
This is an impressions or guess-the-metascore thread.
This is not a review thread.
Not really. I came here to check the reviews and...nothing, zero reviews.
I think review threads should go live when there are at least some reviews available.
Lol at your OP edit. Very stealthy I must say.
How about that:
Division 2 - Impressions Thread.
Everything else is fucking click bait and you know it.
Bro you complain about everything it seems. And you can never face up to when you're wrong. No one gives a shit what your definition of review vs. impression is.Look, I´m not singling you out, OP.
But it used to be that for a review thread to go up you needed actual reviews.
There´s a recent trent where "Review" Threads go up without a single review in them and once actual reviews come out (sometimes days later) the OP has lost interest in her/his own thread and does not update the OP.
This is an impressions thread.
The hostility here is just wholly unwarranted my dude. Let the Mods Mod it out instead of calling for policing.
Bro you complain about everything it seems. And you can never face up to when you're wrong. No one gives a shit what your definition of review vs. impression is.
Oh I wouldn't say 'upset', I'm fine xD. But you know, when I see a review thread on Era I know it might take days before we actually see the reviews. It's mostly people guessing the MT score. Not for me. Again, I'm just more in favor of having a review thread with actual reviews.There are previews, so if you want to read up on where reviews are at (and maybe there will be some scores later today?) you can check in here. Not sure why you're getting upset.
Hey my dude. I want reviews in my review threads. I don´t think that´s a crazy thing to ask for.
Well we'll all be sure to notify you when the reviews start coming in. Are we allowed to continue hyping ourselves or is this not the appropriate thread for that?Hey my dude. I want reviews in my review threads. I don´t think that´s a crazy thing to ask for.
This thread is mislabeled - simple as that.
Hey bro. I don´t think thit has anything to do with "my definition" of anything. An impression is an impression an review is a review.
Well we'll all be sure to notify you when the reviews start coming in. Are we allowed to continue hyping ourselves or is this not the appropriate thread for that?
Good lord, what an indictment of the industry.
I'm excited for this game, but, it absolutely sucks that "functions as intended for a full priced game" is considered a bulletpoint now a days.
Why did review codes for this game go out so late? The game seems like it's in really good shape. Why wouldn't Ubisoft want to get good word of mouth going sooner than now?
Maybe it is just the disappointment at Bioware's sci-fi scramble of incessant loading screens, connection issues and disparate adventuring talking, but I half expected to go into Ubisoft's game facing a clutch of the same issues. But that hasn't happened; I fired up The Division 2, crafted my macho bearded soldier man and sent him into the post-apocalyptic capital to shoot bad guys and find sweet new kneepads. And several hours later, I'm still enjoying a compelling, mechanically satisfying --if aesthetically uninspiring-- shooter. And that's with very few technical hiccups, aside from the odd floating corpse and texture pop-in
Why did review codes for this game go out so late? The game seems like it's in really good shape. Why wouldn't Ubisoft want to get good word of mouth going sooner than now?
Why did review codes for this game go out so late? The game seems like it's in really good shape. Why wouldn't Ubisoft want to get good word of mouth going sooner than now?
Yeah, you pretty much have to review online live service games in a live environment. Plenty of outlets got stung last gen (and early this gen) by early reviews in controlled environments, only to have the live game release to massive network or other problems, making the review look misleading or downright wrong.It's a multiplayer looter shooter. You want people to review a game with very few people in it and the unrealistic scenario of a server that isn't stressed. That's not a legitimate review.
Probably solidly although it should be tanked for having an ingame shop and lootboxes imho.
It should be tanked for having microtransactions at all, there is a version of it that costs 1000 NOK on PSN compared to 5-600 for normal games.
80-85.
Considering the original is an 80 MC and everything I've read about this sequel improving upon it; I'd be expecting mid to high 80's.
People were so dissapointed by Anthem that the Division 2 is gonna look even better in their eyes now lol. Ubisoft devs must be smiling right now
Server issues are typically ephemeral. Reviews of the content, graphical performance, story, controls, audio, and progression are absolutely legitimate and have nothing to do with server connection issues.It's a multiplayer looter shooter. You want people to review a game with very few people in it and the unrealistic scenario of a server that isn't stressed. That's not a legitimate review.
Been playing this since Monday night and I will be shocked if this gets less then a 85 MC.