Graphically, that shot of Far Cry is pretty accurate, at least on PC (where I played it).
Yeah it is, not sure what people are talking about.
Graphically, that shot of Far Cry is pretty accurate, at least on PC (where I played it).
You can say whatever you want about him, but what he says on this video is true.
And yes, he does some errors from time to time but it's not true that he has a fairly understanding of graphics.
He is even developing his own graphical engine.
This is a bullshot. The first rule of comparing visuals between games is never use an Ubisoft game.
All the talk about lighting didn't do much for me but this vid did
halo needs some work.
This is a bullshot. The first rule of comparing visuals between games is never use an Ubisoft game.
Is the gameplay that enjoyable? It looks like the standard halo-fair we got used to. Potentially outdated.The demo was underwhelming, but it is what it is. I am just hoping the game play is enjoyable.
It is . I played it on consoles and it looks like thatGraphically, that shot of Far Cry is pretty accurate, at least on PC (where I played it).
It's up-to-4K in Halo, it's not locked.
Does mad Cherno only state his opinion and comment on graphics?
he was an engine developer for EA for a few years and recently quit to develop his own engine. He has been doing videos lately which are extremely informative and he breaks down the specs of each machine in a very simple way. His channel is amazing for those who want to understand. He has been doing "reactions" to these new gen consoles and this is probably the first time he has been this brutal or negative lol. He's extremely sweet
It needs work but this seems a bit weird as a comparison considering one is 60 fps on consoles and the other isn't One also allows co op on the same screen and one doesn't. When Destiny allows its updates they will only be on the new console to allow 60 fps and yet we still have not seen that in motion or how it will look.
" I think it looks fairly average for a current gen game "
" in fact that is being generous "
The only "error" I've seen from him is not really seeing that Clank's reflections were raytraced, I think? Which is extremely nitpicky. These are his side videos, for fun, while he works on his game engine series. If somebody is going to disparage him I'd at least like to see what I'm missing and maybe, hell, give him a heads up that he's got a gap in knowledge so he can apply it forward.
Why's he "mad Cherno"? He's never been anything more than mild Cherno imo, never seems to get angry or showboat like so many others on yt.Does mad Cherno only state his opinion and comment on graphics?
OK.Never heard of this guy, lol dont really care what he thinks of it tbh.
Dynamic 4K with some parts of the image at 720p
Just looking at all these other current-gen titles at 4K60 - especially those with open-worlds, and it looks like Halo Infinite is very comparable. I guess the problem is that people expected more for a cross-gen title.It's a bullshot you're right.
How about a video?
Far Cry 5 Real Life Graphics | Ultra Realism 4K 60fps
America the Beautiful. Far Cry 5 Ultra Realistic Graphics in 4K 60fps.View in 4K on a nice display for the best experience. ◢Check out 2018 & 2019's MIND-BL...www.youtube.com
Yep still look a generation if not more better.
there was pointless hostility in his post, it was just directed towards Cherno instead of Halo.Curious to see what your take is, or would you rather avoid to pointless hostility that seems to permuate everything on here these days?
You can bet 343 are working hard (not too hard mind) to polish the game and improve it so it's at a level we all expect from a new Halo game.All this negativity around Halo lately hurts so much... I think it's justified mind you, just so damn depressing. I was hyped for years to see Halo again and expected a huge return to form after all the secrecy and development time.
God damn it Microsoft.
To people who say why he said it looks current gen :
This is farcry 5 (current gen) thats open world and runs 4k 60 fps on 2080 (equivalent of xsx in pc )
Do you blame him that he says it looks current gen ?
In my personal opinion farcry is more impressive
I get that its Halo but Microsoft really should have taken another game as the major showcase for their NextGen console.
Halo Infinite needs to put back into the oven. It looks like its fresh out of the freezer.
They let themselves in.Who invited the guys that say that they don't know why his comments are of worth?
You know you can just not post in a thread if you're not interested in the topic, right?I don't know who this is or why his opinion should carry a lot of weight for me.
Is the gameplay that enjoyable? It looks like the standard halo-fair we got used to. Potentially outdated.
All this negativity around Halo lately hurts so much... I think it's justified mind you, just so damn depressing. I was hyped for years to see Halo again and expected a huge return to form after all the secrecy and development time.
God damn it Microsoft.
Yeah, this is where I am at - as much as I like DF - I can't understand half the things they say.I like this guy's stuff. As someone who doesn't know shit as to what's going on under the hood, I feel he does a good job of breaking down tech in a way I can understand. He also seems like a genuine dude.
Gotta agree there, even Halo 4 on MCC looks more modern to me." I think it looks fairly average for a current gen game "
" in fact that is being generous "
All this negativity around Halo lately hurts so much... I think it's justified mind you, just so damn depressing. I was hyped for years to see Halo again and expected a huge return to form after all the secrecy and development time.
God damn it Microsoft.
It doesn't make any sense in fact especially considering the hardware of Xbox Series X. Either the engine doesn't scale well or maybe they encountered a lot of issue during development. We'll probably get more info later this year.It is strange that there aren't elements to make it look next-gen, even 'cheap' ones.
The effects really stand out in this regard. I would expect particles from the explosions, just because you can. Maybe lingering smoke - just something visually excessive.
Well maybe some elements look worse in the other games, but if the overall impact is more then it doesn't really matter how much tech Halo Infinite has because it all goes pretty much wasted and unnoticed (at which point as developer your are throwing cash at a wall and wasting your time).Just looking at all these other current-gen titles at 4K60 - especially those with open-worlds, and it looks like Halo Infinite is very comparable. I guess the problem is that people expected more for a cross-gen title.
For example, Far Cry 5, the ground textures look worse. The rock textures, including the mountain ranges in the background are worse - and those are not even playable spaces. The player model is very low in poly-count. The animations are equally bad. The skybox/clouds are worse. I guess there's just more bad grass everywhere. And the lighting is a tad bit better. But to say this game is significantly better looking than Halo is just wrong.
Halo Infinite is not the best looking game out there by no means, but let's not lie about how good other games look.
yeah I I know he's not a fanboy, but I am more in the thought of what is the point of this here after days of piling on 343 and Halo. The game needs some graphical polish after seeing that initial showing for sure, but everything else that I know about it besides the less than impressive graphics, sounds amazing. And we don't even know much about it yet.
It's like a microcosm cancel culture here. Where is there a thread that has some constructive crit or feedback that 343i could use? Instead of memes and driveby idiocy? It's just a little frustrating that there are a bunch of smart and informed people here that drool over the opportunity to shitpile on any misstep in the industry that they love.
Whatever. Cherno is a smart man using his status so no blame on him. What he said isn't exactly wrong.
I'm not understanding your and the other user stance to be honest, people were talking about him like he worked on frostbite for some time, all Corralx did was correct that assumption and say people here go to town on DF and call them out on their errors, even if most of the people working there know more about graphics technology than 99% of the people here.The only "error" I've seen from him is not really seeing that Clank's reflections were raytraced, I think? Which is extremely nitpicky. These are his side videos, for fun, while he works on his game engine series. If somebody is going to disparage him I'd at least like to see what I'm missing and maybe, hell, give him a heads up that he's got a gap in knowledge so he can apply it forward.
Check out his flight simulator reaction.I wasn't sure who Cherno is, but I went through his videos and he seems to be a dev?
Anyway, I did watch snippets from a few other videos, including Cyberpunk and Rachet and Clank. He doesn't seem to be impressed with anything. LOL. Anyone got a video where he's generally impressed with something?
I find it hilarious that people are so angry about other people's opinions on the Halo reveal. Let others discuss things they want to discuss. No reason to even pop into threads like this asking
'why do I care?'
No one cares if you care. Scroll on by. This is just as much a valid conversation as the bazillion GamePass is awesome threads on here.