To the first: Because their IPs are what make them money, not investing in tournament scenes. The vast majority of the 23 million + people who have purchased Smash Bros Ultimate have never once set eyes on a Smash tourney, let alone a melee tourney specifically. It's not like with Capcom or NRS where a strong minority of the consumer base for their fighting games are tourney players or viewers and, thus, it behooves them to invest in the scene. The fact that they're playing a 20 year old game is even more reason for then to not care about the scene, but the IP. They don't make a thin red cent off of copies of Melee anymore, but playing it with Slippi means it's not the game disk but a copy of an ISO and that's gonna draw attention eventually.It continues to boggle my mind how much Nintendo gives a shit about their intellectual property when they could care fuck all about everything else. Competitive Smash could be one of the biggest deals on the planet, and yet continues to thumb their nose at it even when they are playing a near 20-year old game.
And they're supposed to be the good guys and the most pro-consumer of the games industry!
[/QUOTE]And they're supposed to be the good guys and the most pro-consumer of the games industry!
Ah the fans of smash already throw trash at each other so whats the difference. https://kotaku.com/spectator-throws-dead-crab-at-super-smash-bros-tournam-1834214643
Yeah not very bright. Nintendo brought the hammer down, but the organizers refused to move despite the warning. They could have had Ultimate...So the TO torpedoed the whole event instead of agreeing and pulling Melee. Smooth.
Yeah not very bright. Nintendo brought the hammer down, but the organizers refused to move despite the warning. They could have had Ultimate...
And this has what to do with this situation?Ah the fans of smash already throw trash at each other so whats the difference. https://kotaku.com/spectator-throws-dead-crab-at-super-smash-bros-tournam-1834214643
Ah the fans of smash already throw trash at each other so whats the difference. https://kotaku.com/spectator-throws-dead-crab-at-super-smash-bros-tournam-1834214643
That's the dumbest idea I've seen regarding this issue. Have the TOs bankrupt themselves all for some internet clout.Nobody is stopping them. If they are serious they should stand their ground. Broadcast anyway. If they get sued, face legal action, and have to deplete their savings in a court case so be it. Sometimes you should stand up for your rights.
If they end up doing jail time we will all applaud them as heroes.
Nintendo would just go after them on copyright grounds and probably win unless they manage to set a fair use precedent that affects the entire industry. The Slippi/Anther's Ladder devs are the ones that should be willing to fight, but I think Nintendo is smart enough to not do that.Nobody is stopping them. If they are serious they should stand their ground. Broadcast anyway. If they get sued, face legal action, and have to deplete their savings in a court case so be it. Sometimes you should stand up for your rights.
If they end up doing jail time we will all applaud them as heroes.
Nobody is stopping them. If they are serious they should stand their ground. Broadcast anyway. If they get sued, face legal action, and have to deplete their savings in a court case so be it. Sometimes you should stand up for your rights.
If they end up doing jail time we will all applaud them as heroes.
How is it not bright of them to take a stand for a game they believe in?Yeah not very bright. Nintendo brought the hammer down, but the organizers refused to move despite the warning. They could have had Ultimate...
That's the dumbest idea I've seen regarding this issue. Have the TOs bankrupt themselves all for some internet clout.
Easy for people to say dumb shit like "other people should stop being cowards and sacrifice and lose everything."
I don't think ANYONE would accept losing everything and going to jail so some internet randos can think they're cool, wtf
Nobody is stopping them. If they are serious they should stand their ground. Broadcast anyway. If they get sued, face legal action, and have to deplete their savings in a court case so be it. Sometimes you should stand up for your rights.
If they end up doing jail time we will all applaud them as heroes.
These people would literally be in financial ruin that they likely could not recover from for this. Right or wrong doesn't matter here, the financial resources to prove it do.
Pretty sure most of the time they are called that because people misuse the term and believe it means "they did something i don't like"Yup, Nintendo is definitely the most anti-consumer™ of the big three... I don't know how would anyone call them even slightly pro-consumer.
All I am saying is they feel they are in the right. If they do, they should stand up for their rights and fight it. Even if they lose everything, you can't put a price on your or principles is all I am saying.
I mean, there is legal precedent that allows consumers to backup games they've purchased. They just released a statement saying that emulators require use of illegally copied games. To me, that's pretty clearly "anti-consumer".Pretty sure most of the time they are called that because people misuse the term and believe it means "they did something i don't like"
No one thinks the TOs are ultimately in the right. They are in their rights to use the emulator, but at the end of the day Nintendo can treat them like any other streamer.I think they should take it as far as they can until they can no longer afford to fight it. Setup a patreon and ask for help. People have lost their lives for their principles. I think they should proceed and if ruin comes, so be it.
Because courts have pretty much said they're in the wrong for 20yr so they have no place calling it criminal activity other than to put stigma on it.Ah Nintendo made a statement. And it makes sense. This was never about slippi being a mod or whatever. It was always about emulation which is a thorn in Nintendo's side. Sure, you technically can make completely legal copies of games and play them on emulators but realistically, how many people are gonna do that? So I can totally understand why Nintendo is not okay with this.
Sucks but they didn't take Slippi down or anything, so online play is gonna continue just fine.
Pretty sure most of the time they are called that because people misuse the term and believe it means "they did something i don't like"
Because courts have pretty much said they're in the wrong for 20yr so they have no place calling it criminal activity other than to put stigma on it.
That is why i said most of the time, most people here call anti-consumer anything they dislike when a company does itSelling a product with a latent defect for 4 years do seem very anti-consumer to me and not a case of "they did something I don't like".
But Slippi is not a modification to their software, as is stated in the OP and many times in this thread. They just released a statement that effectively said emulation is illegal, which has frustrated many as there is legal precedent to support the contrary.Anyone who's been around for a while has known that Nintendo's never wanted Melee around for the past decade. Nor do they want any modifications to their software, period. Same thing happened with Project M. This is nothing new nor surprising.
But Slippi is not a modification to their software, as is stated in the OP and many times in this thread. They just released a statement that effectively said emulation is illegal, which has frustrated many people as there is legal precedent to support the contrary.
I get what you're saying but unless as a company you want to die on the hill everyone using slippis a pirate, thats a trash corporate stance >_>I know emulation itself is legal. I'm saying that most people don't use emulation in the legal way and thus it makes sense that Nintendo takes issue with it.
No - I'm confused as to where you got the idea that I was interested in that. I'm simply pointing out that this is different, and more anti-consumer, than something like disallowing a mod like Project M.
They used to sponsor TBH, the only reason that tourney was going to be online is covid.They sponsor GDQ and GDQ doesn't profit off of their software so most likely not.
Ah Nintendo made a statement. And it makes sense. This was never about slippi being a mod or whatever. It was always about emulation which is a thorn in Nintendo's side.