there's probably an unnecessary amount of butthurt for a curated dex
Oh cool we're on the "few bad apples" part of this discourse.Nobody, and I mean absolutely NOBODY is defending this. That's absolutely fucked up.
I came into this thread because it was heavily leaning on the "fans are calling them lazy" shit.
Not sure where you got that from what I said. I said it was fucked up and that 0 people are defending it.
They ALREADY HAVE the character models for for the 800+ Pokemon. They've been using the same models for a while now, and yet here they are purging the dex anyway, and it seems that they'll never put all Pokemon in the same game ever again.The people mad about all 800 Pokemon not being in the new game or the graphical fidelity of the new game are mostly people who don't have the first clue about the realities of modern game development and the incredible increase in work that occurs when you go from developing a brand new open World game for a 5gflop GPU to a 192gflop GPU (a generational leap in graphics is usually defined by a 10x leap. That is a near 40x leap...).
3DS to Switch (even in portable mode) is the largest generational leap in the history of gaming. The increase in manpower needed to create open World games on Switch in comparison to 3DS is unimaginable. The leap in textures, shadow maps, lighting, geometric complexity, character models and spell effects are also all momentous in comparison to developing a 3DS game and all that is ignoring creating updated 3D models of all 800 previous Pokemon.
To the people having meltdowns online... Get off developers backs and stop acting like entitled children.
They've excused it, or downplayed it- not better.
Okay, so...?
If it was simple to do it would've been done.They ALREADY HAVE the character models for for the 800+ Pokemon. They've been using the same models for a while now, and yet here they are purging the dex anyway, and it seems that they'll never put all Pokemon in the same game ever again.
The harrasment is awful, of couse, but this decision is absolutely deserving of criticism. People just need to voice their complaints in a reasonable manner.
Occam's razor tells us that if everything were as simple as "They have done all the work before" TPC would have avoid all this show.They ALREADY HAVE the character models for for the 800+ Pokemon. They've been using the same models for a while now, and yet here they are purging the dex anyway, and it seems that they'll never put all Pokemon in the same game ever again.
The harrasment is awful, of couse, but this decision is absolutely deserving of criticism. People just need to voice their complaints in a reasonable manner.
They ALREADY HAVE the character models for for the 800+ Pokemon. They've been using the same models for a while now, and yet here they are purging the dex anyway, and it seems that they'll never put all Pokemon in the same game ever again.
The harrasment is awful, of couse, but this decision is absolutely deserving of criticism. People just need to voice their complaints in a reasonable manner.
Not trying to sound like an asshole here (but will probably come off this way anyway), but you tend to get too stressed out in threads where people call out or criticize Nintendo (or related topics such as this one), so if you're truly feeling this way (as per your post), I'd definitely recommend stepping out for a bit and avoiding Twitter as well because this hobby ain't seriously worth mentally harming oneself over.I dont care anymore, more like I cant with this anymore.
I give up, this life is horrible.
They are too stubborn and cheap to hire the staff needed. Game Freak is a tiny studio and yet they want to do multiple HD titles at once.Occam's razor tells us that if everything were as simple as "They have done all the work before" TPC would have avoid all this show.
I dont care anymore, more like I cant with this anymore.
I give up, this life is horrible.
Maybe, they should take the approach they're taking now. Stay small and slash and burn the dex.They are too stubborn and cheap to hire the staff needed. Game Freak is a tiny studio and yet they want to do multiple HD titles at once.
And if it is actually hard work to put their assets into the game then they fucked up big time in the creation of their engine.
Because you're dismissing this based on the grounds that it's really extreme while failing to acknowledge the systemic problems in Pokemon fandom that led to this even being made in the first place. That's basically what the phrase "few bad apples" is. Yeah no shit people shouldn't be defending this, but ultimately, what's the difference between that and inflammatory accusations, dog piling and conspiracy mongering, all of which basically under the same umbrella in terms of toxicity.Not sure where you got that from what I said. I said it was fucked up and that 0 people are defending it.
They are too stubborn and cheap to hire the staff needed. Game Freak is a tiny studio and yet they want to do multiple HD titles at once.
And if it is actually hard work to put their assets into the game then they fucked up big time in the creation of their engine.
Or maybe they should treat a series that sells 15 million every year like it's actually a big series.Maybe, they should take the approach they're taking now. Stay small and slash and burn the dex.
I'm not calling them lazy, the people working on the game are working hard, I'm not questioning that, but the people in charge of the studio are too cheap to properly staff the team for a 15 million seller. They treat Pokemon like it's a small series when it needs more.i dont understand why you think using other words instead of lazy doesn;t make your post a "lady devs" post anyways.
cheap and stubborn?
By what? Slashing the fat out of the Dex was something I've wanted since they crossed gen 5 and I don't see this game looking any better on Switch so I'm not sure where to go with it. Xenoblade 2 runs at like 368p, and FFXII runs under 600p so improvements to the engine will only get you so far if you're trying to hit an IQ better than either of these.Or maybe they should treat a series that sells 15 million every year like it's actually a big series.
I'm not calling them lazy, the people working on the game are working hard, I'm not questing that, but the people in charge of the studio are too cheap to properly staff the team for a 15 million seller.
The gamergate comparisons really are the laziest way for people to try to shut down criticism, like gamergate and this situation have anything at all in common.Cool, we've finally reached the part of the thread where we equate this to gamergate.
Good for you, but every Pokemon is someone's favorite and people don't want their Pokemon to be held indefinitely in a prison.By what? Slashing the fat out of the Dex was something I've wanted since they crossed gen 5 and I don't see this game looking any better on Switch so I'm not sure where to go with it. Xenoblade 2 runs at like 368p, and FFXII runs under 600p so improvements to the engine will only get you so far if you're trying to hit an IQ better than either of these.
Cool, they can play with them in the games they're in. In the mean time, the games can and should cut the size of the dex.The gamergate comparisons really are the laziest way for people to try to shut down criticism, like gamergate and this situation have anything at all in common.
Good for you, but every Pokemon is someone's favorite and people don't want their Pokemon to be held indefinitely in a prison.
"Instead of trying to explain why this harassment campaign isn't anything like any other harassment campaign, I'm just going to dismiss everything you say as silly. Hehe look at me and my nuanced discussion."Cool, we've finally reached the part of the thread where we equate this to gamergate.
i dont understand why you think using other words instead of lazy doesn;t make your post a "lady devs" post anyways.
cheap and stubborn?
stop beating around the bush and quote the posts you think are excusing harassment
"No one is defending harassment."the only thing that needs to stop is people tripping over themselves to defend companies that continuously try to get away with the bare minimum
Because you're dismissing this based on the grounds that it's really extreme while failing to acknowledge the systemic problems in Pokemon fandom that led to this even being made in the first place. That's basically what the phrase "few bad apples" is. Yeah no shit people shouldn't be defending this, but ultimately, what's the difference between that and inflammatory accusations, dog piling and conspiracy mongering, all of which basically under the same umbrella in terms of toxicity.
It's ok to be disappointed, but at this point this kind of behavior is no better than gamergate, and if you don't like being compared to gamergate, maybe some self-relection is needed because I'm seeing straight up the same tactics used.
Cool, they can play with them in the games they're in. In the mean time, the games can and should cut the size of the dex.
Stop equating people being upset over Game Freak's bullshit to a harassment campaign."Instead of trying to explain why this harassment campaign isn't anything like any other harassment campaign, I'm just going to dismiss everything you say as silly. Hehe look at me and my nuanced discussion."
None of these words are mutually exclusive traitsi dont understand why you think using other words instead of lazy doesn;t make your post a "lady devs" post anyways.
cheap and stubborn?
Then why did Masuda pretty much say that even in future games they'll be cutting Pokemon, even though all of the models will should be done by then?Occam's razor tells us that if everything were as simple as "They have done all the work before" TPC would have avoid all this show.
They literally are.
I never said they should be harassed wtf are you talking about
Dude, someone literally made a fake Twitter account just to slander Game Freak. How is that not a harassment campaign?Stop equating people being upset over Game Freak's bullshit to a harassment campaign.
Yes?Wait, you're advocating that culling the dex no matter what would be an improvement?
It seems clear that it boils down to them wanting the dex to be smaller and they might rotate them out in future entries, finally.Then why Masuda pretty much say that even in future games they'll be cutting Pokemon, even though all of the models will should be done by then?
This is huge. For the most part, game communities lack any real understanding of how games are made or why certain decisions are made. This leads to a lot of people talking out of their ass and riling the fanbases up with misinformation.The literature behind the realities/tradeoffs of game development and the software development lifecycle is still lacking, which has continued to lead to a lot of misinformed criticism. (it's improving though, e.g. more discussion about crunch)
When you say this:I never said they should be harassed wtf are you talking about
And the OP says this about the harassment and toxicity:the only thing that needs to stop is people tripping over themselves to defend companies that continuously try to get away with the bare minimum
However, I think it is really important to stop the way things are going.
You do know that not one game had every single Pokemon available to catch and that isnt what people are upset about, yes?It seems clear that it boils down to them wanting the dex to be smaller and they might rotate them out in future entries, finally.
I never said they should be harassed wtf are you talking about
Yes, I'm hoping they start to deprecate some.You do know that not one game had every single Pokemon available to catch and that isnt what people are upset about, yes?
Then what is the benefit, from your point of view, of culling the dex?
Imagine thinking calling out the "few bad apples" excuse is "rotten to the core".The community is rotten to the core. You add to it but I guess you fail to see that.
It really is just this. If they want to make a policy of every new Generation be lacking in some Pokemon then that's fine but having it be a policy for each new game to not have the full dex for no reason is kind of where I start question of why.Then why did Masuda pretty much say that even in future games they'll be cutting Pokemon, even though all of the models will should be done by then?
I could accept SwSh not having all Pokemon if Gamefreak would just tell us that future games will have them all. They refuse to, and that is unreasonable.
They literally are.
This is not an organized harassment campaign, there are plenty of shitty individuals harassing people but the majority of people are just loudly stating how upset they are over Game Freak's shit. GamerGate was an organized effort to harass women for daring to exist on the internet, there is literally nothing in common here and the comparison is quite frankly gross.Dude, someone literally made a fake Twitter account just to slander Game Freak. How is that not a harassment campaign?
If you know this then why did you say this is only about the curated dex when literally every game has a curated dex?