NYC is incredibly beautiful to me, even the new stuff and all of the new towers going up in Manhattan. But 1940s NYC in particular was absolutely stunning to me. I don't think another city at another point in time will ever come close for me personally. Hell, even those black and white shots of 80s Manhattan with all of the graffiti and smoke and grime have their own beauty. I'd personally put NYC at #1, but like you said, it's in the eye of the beholder.
Law & Order: SVU tells me there is a dead body around every corner so I know this can't be true...2. New York, New York, USA
Trash city represent! Our scenic piles of middle ages style refuge! Our towering sidewalk sheds! Our functional transportation systems!
Exactly, you can pretty much pick any italian city at random and its more beautiful than NYC or san fran and ParisWhat kind of trash list is this? lmao
It's super shallow.. like taking some of the most wellknown cities in the world and just sorting them by the reputation they have.
Of course someone from the south would say that. Rio's problems aren't worse than those cities, they are just more well known because the biggest media is hereNot so sure about Lisbon and Rio.
The nature in Rio is amazingly beautiful, but the city itself is awful, especially if you leave the richer zones. From Brazil, I think Curitiba or FlorianĂłpolis (especially the nature) are more beautiful.
Lisbon is great, but there's lots of buildings that desesperately need some maintenance, also there's too many 70-90's buildings outside of the historic centre that are awful.
Chicago is amazing.
It isnt, not only it has nothing as beautiful as the beaches, the Tijuca forests and other things, it is fucking polluted in a way that is impossible to live well if you have respiratory problems.
Your stanning for New England is hilarious. Stamford is the shittiest place on earth and Providence is pretty ugly. Boston is indeed beautiful though. Standing on the Mass Ave bridge at sunset is breathtakinglmao @ New york being "beautiful"
real list -
1. Boston
2. Stamford CT (WWE headquarters)
3. Providence
Yep. All pictures of Rio being considered beautiful are of the ocean and/or the surrounding nature. If the city even shows up, it's just a small part from far away, while hiding the favelas as best as they can.The nature in Rio is amazingly beautiful, but the city itself is awful, especially if you leave the richer zones. From Brazil, I think Curitiba or FlorianĂłpolis (especially the nature) are more beautiful.
Rio's beaches are overrated and the city sucks.There are plenty of cities just here in Rio that I would put above New York
Of course someone from the south would say that. Rio's problems aren't worse than those cities, they are just more well known because the biggest media is here
Anyway there is nothing in those cities that come as close to being as beautiful as Tijuca forest for example. Hell I would put most northeast capitals above any south one
It isnt, not only it has nothing as beautiful as the beaches, the Tijuca forests and other things, it is fucking polluted in a way that is impossible to live well if you have respiratory problems.
Culture has nothing to do with beautyRio's beaches are overrated and the city sucks.
Sao Paulo, culturally, is way cooler. Yeah, it's a big sprawling monstrous behometh of a city, but I found it way nicer than Rio.
This too.I'm sorry, but beautiful is not the word I associate Berlin with.
lmao @ New york being "beautiful"
real list -
1. Boston
2. Stamford CT (WWE headquarters)
3. Providence
Law & Order: SVU tells me there is a dead body around every corner so I know this can't be true...
Outside of Portland ME there aren't really any other cities in New England.... But yeah, Portland is pretty beautiful by the water. Burlington VT is nice but it's tiny
Yeah, NYC is extremely impressive. But beautiful? IDK about that.
Yeah, NYC is extremely impressive. But beautiful? IDK about that.
No doubt. I'm sure somewhere, at some angle, in the right light, NYC is gorgeous.
Outside of Portland ME there aren't really any other cities in New England.... But yeah, Portland is pretty beautiful by the water. Burlington VT is nice but it's tiny
Of course someone from the south would say that. Rio's problems aren't worse than those cities, they are just more well known because the biggest media is here
Anyway there is nothing in those cities that come as close to being as beautiful as Tijuca forest for example. Hell I would put most northeast capitals above any south one
It isnt, not only it has nothing as beautiful as the beaches, the Tijuca forests and other things, it is fucking polluted in a way that is impossible to live well if you have respiratory problems.
New York is a great city but New York at #2 on "Most beautiful cities" makes no sense to me... but London also doesn't make sense, at least it makes more sense than New York. Vancouver is a good example of a beautiful city where you have contrast, enormous hovering mountains surrounding a dense city center with a vibrant skyline, and then surrounded by water on all sides. It's a contrast between nature and the city. New York has no contrast. It's an inescapable urban cityscape and, sure, central park is good, but it's a planned urban park that is as natural as a skyscraper. I love visiting New York, have a great time there, but the suffocating density of New York and the inescapability of the city makes it difficult for me to consider it "beautiful."
Vancouver looks like it's out of a scifi videogame, like one of those things where you'd think it's too fantastical to be real, with enormous mountains, water on all sides, and then this insane dense urban skyline packed onto a tiny island.