-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
This lost is pretty stupid, it reads like a well known big city list, not most beautiful.
Berlin representing germany for example ... seriously? Trier, Heidelberg, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Lübeck etc. are all beautiful cities, Berlin is awesome but not really beautiful.
Berlin representing germany for example ... seriously? Trier, Heidelberg, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Lübeck etc. are all beautiful cities, Berlin is awesome but not really beautiful.
Thats a weird ass list and Ive lived in the top two cities, Paris is dirty and bland and New York is charming and vibrant but also a bit of a shithole. Also, SF? What?
I love Tokyo and Barcelona, however even within Japan I think Kyoto is more impressive, maybe even Osaka. Tons of lesser known Mexican cities are way above, you know, San Jose.
I love Tokyo and Barcelona, however even within Japan I think Kyoto is more impressive, maybe even Osaka. Tons of lesser known Mexican cities are way above, you know, San Jose.
I've been to 12 of those cities (born, raised and still living in no. 42) and I feel that they went for the largest cities in each country instead of the most beautiful ones.
Because let's be honest, saying that Berlin or Madrid(!!!) are more beautiful than Donostia is absolutely mental.
Because let's be honest, saying that Berlin or Madrid(!!!) are more beautiful than Donostia is absolutely mental.
Sounds like you had Paris syndrome. I've been to Paris and it was absolutely beautiful. Such an amazing city.
Florence has an oddly artificial quality to it which isn't quite as prevalent in Rome in my opinion. I like Florence a great deal, but it's a bit like a theme park.
Also, London is fantastic but it isn't particularly attractive. Paris sucks. Vienna is gorgeous and Melbourne > Sydney.
That top 3 would be a fine top 3 for just about any list of world cities.. except this one.
Edinburgh is painfully low as well.
Edinburgh is painfully low as well.
Not so sure about Lisbon and Rio.
The nature in Rio is amazingly beautiful, but the city itself is awful, especially if you leave the richer zones. From Brazil, I think Curitiba or Florianópolis (especially the nature) are more beautiful.
Lisbon is great, but there's lots of buildings that desesperately need some maintenance, also there's too many 70-90's buildings outside of the historic centre that are awful.
Chicago is amazing.
The nature in Rio is amazingly beautiful, but the city itself is awful, especially if you leave the richer zones. From Brazil, I think Curitiba or Florianópolis (especially the nature) are more beautiful.
Lisbon is great, but there's lots of buildings that desesperately need some maintenance, also there's too many 70-90's buildings outside of the historic centre that are awful.
Chicago is amazing.
Zürich is probably the only city of Switzerland wich is big enough to be compared with the other cities on this list.
I like Paris just fine, but it's miles away from being the most beautiful city in France.
Same goes for London. Yes, it has strata of history, great architecture etc., but it's also a very ugly place from a lot of angles. I like London a lot, but I can think of several UK cities I'd say are easily more beautiful.
Same goes for London. Yes, it has strata of history, great architecture etc., but it's also a very ugly place from a lot of angles. I like London a lot, but I can think of several UK cities I'd say are easily more beautiful.
Berlin is an interesting city, but beautiful? Nah
Weird list anyway. If it was only capitals, it would be one thing. But Bruges and Bergen are in there instead of Brussels and Oslo, so there's no reason not to go for actually beautiful cities instead of Berlin or Paris.
Just drop the capitals. Why choose Rome if you can choose Siena?
Weird list anyway. If it was only capitals, it would be one thing. But Bruges and Bergen are in there instead of Brussels and Oslo, so there's no reason not to go for actually beautiful cities instead of Berlin or Paris.
Just drop the capitals. Why choose Rome if you can choose Siena?
I love Tokyo with all my heart but it's not pretty. Kyoto is better, but mostly just around the edges. I found Hiroshima better looking, especially if you include Miyajima. Kobe was also quite gorgerous.
No Stockholm?
I also found Bruges a little disappointing. Ghent was better.
No Stockholm?
I also found Bruges a little disappointing. Ghent was better.
The monuments alone sets it apart from most cities in Europe. That's without even taking into account museum and the architecture.
The centre of London definitely is, the views across the river from any of the bridges are great
Basically every city on this list I've been to - London, Berlin, Chicago and Paris - don't belong here. Dubrovnik is acceptable, Edinburgh is well deserved.
Most cities have some nice views or attractive vistas. The thing is though, London overall is a mess of clashing architectural styles and ugly, dirty buildings. There are many things to love about London, but it's beauty isn't one of them.
Paris? I mean, sure, if they clean it. Maybe.
Amsterdam?.. Has its charme but it's also kinda dirty.
NewYork beautiful?
Florence should be on that list, i agree with posters here.
I dunno man. Is this list made by a person who just IMAGINED these cities or by people who actually went there?
Amsterdam?.. Has its charme but it's also kinda dirty.
NewYork beautiful?
Florence should be on that list, i agree with posters here.
I dunno man. Is this list made by a person who just IMAGINED these cities or by people who actually went there?
Last edited:
