this video shows a different bridge that is not only bad for trucks but plenty of cars seem to hit the sidewalk and lose control under that bridge
It's on page 1 but yeah it's savage lol
this video shows a different bridge that is not only bad for trucks but plenty of cars seem to hit the sidewalk and lose control under that bridge
There are canals all along the Delware river on both the Jersey and Pennsylvania sides and some are actually lower than this. One is around 10'11" near where I work. The spot over the road is covered in the imprints of several different trucks with drivers who weren't paying attention.
this video shows a different bridge that is not only bad for trucks but plenty of cars seem to hit the sidewalk and lose control under that bridge
this video shows a different bridge that is not only bad for trucks but plenty of cars seem to hit the sidewalk and lose control under that bridge
Most are rentals and the rental companies salivate when people don't get the insurance.ya, most of these trucks are only single axle and I'm sure you only need a standard licence to drive them unlike a dumptruck or tractor trailer which requires separate licencing/training/hours.
You literally can't make it higher because of the rail tracksOf course it'd cost money but do they leave the bridge like that now because it's haha internet memes are funny? Make that bridge a meter higher (or the floor lower) and stop fucking up with drivers. One day there might be a fatal accident.
I'm no engineer but I'm sure there is some solution. Couldn't the rail tracks curve a bit upwards to make room for a higher bridge? Or just dig a hole underneath and make the road lower.
I'm no engineer but I'm sure there is some solution. Couldn't the rail tracks curve a bit upwards to make room for a higher bridge? Or just dig a hole underneath and make the road lower.
Can't the road be lowered?
That would be prohibitively expensive because a sewer main runs just a few feet below the road bed. That sewer main also dates back about a hundred years and, again, at the time there were no real standards for minimum clearance for railroad underpasses.
Can't the bridge be raised?
Here, too, the question is who would want to pay the millions of dollars to raise the tracks a couple of feet? To accomplish this, the grade of the tracks would have to changed on both sides of the trestle, probably for several miles. That would require rebuilding all trestles in Durham. And NS would have to shut down this busy track for months. I don't think they are interested in that idea.
I'm no engineer but I'm sure there is some solution. Couldn't the rail tracks curve a bit upwards to make room for a higher bridge? Or just dig a hole underneath and make the road lower.
This. The city should pay to change the tracks and make the bridge a little bit higher. One day there might be a fatal accident or worse, a crash so bad it could put the integrity of the bridge itself and the trains that go above it in peril.The excuse given for not raising the bridge is poor. Local governments are asked and over spend on projects all the time. Making sure someone isnt injured/die in a car crash is certainly worthwhile.
Yeah, the Federal government helps pay for infrastructure projects too. It doesnt have to be all on the city.This. The city should pay to change the tracks and make the bridge a little bit higher. One day there might be a fatal accident or worse, a crash so bad it could put the integrity of the bridge itself and the trains that go above it in peril.
It's not up to the city, they don't own the tracks.This. The city should pay to change the tracks and make the bridge a little bit higher. One day there might be a fatal accident or worse, a crash so bad it could put the integrity of the bridge itself and the trains that go above it in peril.
I agree with this, lower it to like 9' so no one with a large truck even tries to get through. I'm sure some idiot would still ignore the signs or someone would be half-asleep and ram through it, and I'm not sure if a 9' height would be fatal to someone in a semi so maybe it's not such a good idea...What they actually need to do is lower it. Put up a barrier that makes it like 9 feet so trucks can't think they can get through it. These are hilarious though.
Tell me about itI love this thread for the know nothing wanna be engineers who think this is an easy fix.
It's my favorite part of this getting bumped, even more so than the actual videos.I love this thread for the know nothing wanna be engineers who think this is an easy fix.
I love this thread for the know nothing wanna be engineers who think this is an easy fix.
I love this thread for the know nothing wanna be engineers who think this is an easy fix.
Why didn't the light turn red on that one? The overheight sign was blinking but the light was clearly green.
I guess the video is slowed down, but I was already watching the second point-of-view. It takes about 6 seconds AFTER it turns back green for the truck to drive through -- maybe 3 seconds in real life?It had already turned red. And he was looking directly at the over height flashing text the whole time it was red...but still went straight after it turned green. You can see it more evidently in the 2nd POV.
I guess the video is slowed down, but I was already watching the second point-of-view. It takes about 6 seconds AFTER it turns back green for the truck to drive through -- maybe 3 seconds in real life?
I completely agree with all the comments about armchair engineers normally in regard to lowering or raising things, but I don't understand why the light would turn back green so quickly while the overheight sensor is still active. If it were locked red permanently until the sensor clears I don't see a downside, even though people would still probably crash.
I can see that argument, but that's still a shockingly fast time to turn green again at half time slowdown.That would require the over height vehicle to turn off that road which would be impossible if it were behind another vehicle.
I was about to type this out the same exact way.
According to the FAQ, there's already sufficient signage everywhere. (But...clearly it's not entirely effective, though, so I'm not sure I understand the unwillingness to embrace some pragmatism.)Why not hang something from the bridge so it's more obvious it isn't passable?
Is it google maps doing this or what?