Abortion in the first 4 mths of gestation is allowed in Islam
Abortion in the first 4 mths of gestation is allowed in Islam
*nods*If you mean "despite them with every fiber of my being" then yes
"Charge, arrest, and jail with a ridiculous bond amount now. Maybe think later." - Talibangicals"In reviewing applicable Texas law, it is clear that Ms. Herrera cannot and should not be prosecuted for the allegation against her."
Awful and backwards as fuck.
"Charge, arrest, and jail now with a ridiculous bond amount. Maybe think later." - Talibangicals
This is so backwards and awful- right wingers and their religious crusades is fucking nuts in the U.S
Can we get Abbot and the GOP arrested for trying to abort democracy?
Okay so now that the charges are drop as this is not a criminal matter. Are the charges then false and she has free reign to sue the officers involved in the arrest as the Supreme Court recently ruled?
Something feels off about this whole story and hoping we get more clarity; wouldn't be surprised if its the usual prosecutorial overreach for a re-election bid or something because this quick a retreat after going semi-viral is odd when they usually double or triple down.
Like someone said above, this was probably an 'imperfect' case to take down Roe X Wade and they wanna wait for a better chance, or feared that an actual full frontal attack before midterms could go the opposite way as opposed to sneak state level attacks
The case I'm thinking of involved the 4th amendment and charges filed that were later dropped. SCOTUS determined the guy affirmed his innocence and the prosecution didn't end in conviction so qualified immunity protections were not valid in the case.Charges being dropped doesn't inherently make them false. In this case, they likely are but the officers still may be protected by qualified immunity if sued.
The case I'm thinking of involved the 4th amendment and charges filed that were later dropped. SCOTUS determined the guy affirmed his innocence and the prosecution didn't end in conviction so qualified immunity protections were not valid in the case.
And requiring a plaintiff to show that his prosecution ended with an affirmative indication of innocence is not necessary to protect officers from unwarranted civil suits, as officers are still protected by the requirement that the plaintiff show the absence of probable cause and by qualified immunity.
Oof, you're right. I just don't see how qualified immunity would protect the officers if the charges were demonstrably false and malicious.That's not what the case said. It said the case can continue but that qualified immunity may still protect officers.
Oh right, this. Forgot where I live.
Oof, you're right. I just don't see how qualified immunity would protect the officers if the charges were demonstrably false and malicious.
Yet.There's probably a lawsuit in there somewhere, since there's no actual law that covers this type of "murder".
Brilliant.If someone can be charged with murder of a fetus... then child support should begin upon conception. As should welfare assistance.
Yes I know the charges were dropped but you can't have it both ways.
You could get an abortion at the gas station.