Not exactly. He retweeted something Rowling said that didn't appear TERFy out of context, and then she praised him for being a wonderful author she looked up to. A twitter follower of his asked him to assert that trans women are women and when he did, Rowling deleted her tweet praising him.
Ugh, Simon Fanshawe. One of the founders of the Stonewall organisation and a major TERF who constantly speaks out about Stonewall's stance on trans rights. He's also one of the supporters of the LGB Alliance. And fuck Tatsuya Ishida too.
Always been trash:Oof Ian McEwan. Or has he always been trash? I enjoyed a couple of his novels.
'The self, like a consumer desirable, may be plucked from the shelves of a personal identity supermarket, a ready to wear little black number,' McEwan said during his speech. 'For example, some men in full possession of a penis are now identifying as women and demanding entry to women-only colleges, and the right to change in women's dressing rooms.'
During a follow up Q&A session one member of the audience asked him to clarify what she referred to as offensive remarks.
'Call me old fashioned, but I tend to think of people with penises as men,' he replied. 'But I know that they enter a difficult world when they become transsexuals and they tell us they are women, they become women, but it's interesting when you hear the conflict between feminists now and people in this group.
'It's quite a bitter conflict. Spaces are put aside, women are wanting to put spaced aside like colleges or changing rooms, and find from another side a radical discussion coming their way saying men who want to feel like it can come in too. I think it's really difficult. And I think there is sweeping through America campuses a strange kind of victimhood and a sense of purposeful identities that we can't actually all of us agree with. Of course sex and race are different, but they also have a biological basis. It makes a difference whether you have an X or Y chromosome.'
Ah yeah, that was the case. It's weird though, Stephen is someone whose opinions are very clear if you follow him on Twitter, so he's got to be aware of JKR's shitty opinions, right?Not exactly. He retweeted something Rowling said that didn't appear TERFy out of context, and then she praised him for being a wonderful author she looked up to. A twitter follower of his asked him to assert that trans women are women and when he did, Rowling deleted her tweet praising him.
Also I understand why all Rowling TERFy developments consolidate in this thread, but I do think the Eddie Redmayne endorsement goes beyond whatever dumb bullshit she's tweeting. He played a trans woman in The Danish Girl and in light of that I think his endorsement deserves to be discussed as its own topic.
So the official stance is that staff are still cool with using this platform to promote her new game then? Very disappointing to hear.Official Staff CommunicationThreads with significant news about Harry Potter or related media can still be made separately, and JK Rowling's transphobic bigotry can (and should) still be discussed in those threads. This thread can be linked there as a resource.
So the official stance is that staff are still cool with using this platform to promote her new game then? Very disappointing to hear.
I think it sends more of a message to disallow promotion of the game on this site, and explain to people why that is, than promote it with a staff message saying that it's okay for people to bring up her transphobia when talking about it.It is not an small indie game that otherwise would get no coverege.
It is a huge game of a huge ip with LOTS of fans that might not know how bad shit is otherwise. It is better to allow people make threads and educate people there, since people who are excited abou the game regardless will enter those threads and read at least the moderation warnings
I think it sends more of a message to disallow promotion of the game on this site, and explain to people why that is, than promote it with a staff message saying that it's okay for people to bring up her transphobia when talking about it.
So the official stance is that staff are still cool with using this platform to promote her new game then? Very disappointing to hear.
I do see your point, but based on the threads we've had so far, it seems that many people just don't care and only want to talk about their video game.not allowing this game to be talked here just means people will get news about in other places, and most other places don't give a fuck about mentioning how shitty are her views
The site should just auto-replace "Harry Potter" with "Transphobic Rowling's Harry Potter".not allowing this game to be talked here just means people will get news about in other places, and most other places don't give a fuck about mentioning how shitty are her views
Eddie Red can choke for all I care. But if Stephen King turns out to be shitty on this issue, that would legit hurt my soul.
J.K. Rowling walked back praise for Stephen King after her fellow author spoke out against her recent anti-transgender comments.
"Trans women are women," King tweeted Sunday, after a fan asked him to address "the TERF tweet," referencing Rowling's social media posts earlier this month, which many fans deemed transphobic.
Earlier that day, King retweeted one of Rowling's posts, which featured a quote about men reacting poorly when women speak out about their experiences. The "Harry Potter" writer had shared a long thread responding to those who criticized her for revealing she had been sexually assaulted in the past in a recent blog post, defending her stance that trans inclusive language is "hostile and alienating" to women.
After King's retweet, Rowling sang "The Shining" author's praises, then deleted the post once King clarified where he stood.
J.K. Rowling retracts tweet praising Stephen King after he supported transgender women
J.K. Rowling walked back praise for Stephen King after her fellow author spoke out against her recent anti-transgender comments.www.usatoday.com
Seems like King is good people.
People coming out in solidarity woth Rowling defintely deserve their own threads as it's about them being transphobic, not her.
If you follow him and read his opinions about pretty much everything, he's great people, but yeah this one instance is weird and I'm baffled.Well, King just tweeted today praising her new book and called her an incredible storyteller, so I wouldn't be too quick on that just yet lol
Completely agree with this!Thank you.
And to be clear, I don't think there's anything hateful about what the mods decided here. It's just misguided.
If Rowling does or says something transphobic, which is constant, I understand it being in a megathread as long as it is still allowed to be discussed in Potter threads (which it is).
But another known celebrity -- the fact of a multi-million dollar franchise -- supporting her? That shouldn't be hidden deep in a megathread.
Well, I think if someone was still thinking about giving Beasts franchise a 'chance' after the whole Deep and JK debacle, I hope they won't now.
Bye Eddie.
If you follow him and read his opinions about pretty much everything, he's great people, but yeah this one instance is weird and I'm baffled.
Well, everyone is great at pretending to be good until the big slip, and then the mask comes off. We'll see
I also agree that we shouldn't bury something like Eddie's stance on her into this thread. I thought the whole just posting it in this thread, was relating to whatever shit Rowling herself is doing.
But anyway, just sad regarding Eddie. As I said in the first locked thread, I became quite fond of Newt, in particular because he could possibly be on the autism spectrum, and Eddie felt like that was the case too. Whether Rowling meant that or not, I felt like there was enough to make it a headcanon at least, and it was nice for a time, but alas.
Welp. That's privilege. Being able to stand up and call someone out for bigotry but at the same time, hey that doesnt actually matter when i don't want to pay attention to it for other reasons. It doesn't affect me!J.K. Rowling retracts tweet praising Stephen King after he supported transgender women
J.K. Rowling walked back praise for Stephen King after her fellow author spoke out against her recent anti-transgender comments.www.usatoday.com
Seems like King is good people.
Kind of wish we would get a mod response here that they are at least looking into how this thread works.
The story is buried in this thread and barely being noticed on Era because of it.
So ResetERA is hiding JK Rowling's bigotry in a mega-thread that people can easily ignore but not disallowing HP threads. Come the fuck on. It isn't that hard. Take a fucking stand for once that isn't some easy niche target (i.e. pedo anime).
They did it because trans members told them it was triggering to constantly have new "JK Rowling is a TERF" threads on the front page. You can kindly stfu trying to use abused children as a cudgel against this forum after the absolute garbage you posted in the Shamima Begum thread though, you don't give one iota of a shit about victims so don't come in here pretending like you do.if resetera isnt against it, its for it.
they are fine against the easy targets, but when it comes to a difficult decision, like banning the promotion of work by hateful bigots, pedophile showbiz stars like jackson, rapist sports stars etc nothing happens.
that list above is sickening.
Alexander Armstrong, Ben Miller? fuck them!
Well, this mega thread came to be because a lot of trans members on Era would rather have JK Rowling news consolidated in one place. Having a thread for every thing she says and does can make it distressing and exhausting if you're the target of her transphobia, and frankly it's difficult to justify making a thread about JK Rowling boosting a transphobic clothing line (which I think was the thread that led to this mega thread decision).So ResetERA is hiding JK Rowling's bigotry in a mega-thread that people can easily ignore but not disallowing HP threads. Come the fuck on. It isn't that hard. Take a fucking stand for once that isn't some easy niche target (i.e. pedo anime).
I understand that maybe not every transphobic tweet needs its own separate thread, and we should be careful not to signal boost transphobic businesses like the clothing thing, but yeah, I'm not sure if all of it should be hidden here. Would it perhaps be a good idea that trans people should be the ones to make the decision whether something is new thread worthy or not? Post here first and if there seems to be a decently unified consensus that trans members feel like it should get larger attention, then post a new thread.Well, this mega thread came to be because a lot of trans members on Era would rather have JK Rowling news consolidated in one place. Having a thread for every thing she says and does can make it distressing and exhausting if you're the target of her transphobia, and frankly it's difficult to justify making a thread about JK Rowling boosting a transphobic clothing line (which I think was the thread that led to this mega thread decision).
I agree though that news like Eddie Redmayne deserves its own thread. It's big news that got a lot more traction and attention in both the threads that were made on the subject.
look at the tory trying to give lessonsif resetera isnt against it, its for it.
they are fine against the easy targets, but when it comes to a difficult decision, like banning the promotion of work by hateful bigots, pedophile showbiz stars like jackson, rapist sports stars etc nothing happens.
that list above is sickening.
Alexander Armstrong, Ben Miller? fuck them!