Oh come on, it's not like the bible says to love thy neighbour.
Bible instructs you on how to beat your slave and your wife.
...Methinks maybe we should just stop using the bible altogether.
Oh come on, it's not like the bible says to love thy neighbour.
Vlaming once remarked that he "missed the female version of the student," ABC reported.
"The thing he will not do is change his ways of thoughts and believing in things just to conform to someone else's ideologies."
Bible instructs you on how to beat your slave and your wife.
...Methinks maybe we should just stop using the bible altogether.
Yeah like really if he's really there to be a teacher to support and teach these kids. Then he'd be supporting them with this, but clearly people value a book over people."Conforming to someone else's beliefs" is called partaking in society. These folks are also the first to complain when students answer the call to prayer. Like, if you want to be isolated in your beliefs join a cult otherwise get on with your job.
Forrest Rohde, a junior at the high school, said it's not fair to punish Vlaming because of his beliefs, WRIC reported.
"I'm just outraged about it," Rohde told WRIC. "He's a really nice guy, he wanted to do everything about his students. He really does care about his students.
"The thing he will not do is change his ways of thoughts and believing in things just to conform to someone else's ideologies."
"Now, the teacher is considering filing a lawsuit, arguing that his First Amendment rights have been violated, per the Richmond Times-Dispatch. He told WTVR that "there are some hills that are worth dying on."
Then he should have no problem with being fired...
It is creepy and cultish. It's also Biblical. Leads to all sorts of awful things.1. Good, then you should be prepared to lose your job for it.
2. That's -ing creepy and sounds like his family is in danger.
"I'm just outraged about it," Rohde told WRIC. "He's a really nice guy, he wanted to do everything about his students. He really does care about his students.
So he's fine with using a masculine name but not masculine pronouns? How the fuck is that even logical?
This reminds me of the time when I was talking to a friend and he said he shares Ben Shapiro's view on refusing to call transgender folks by their new preferred pronouns. It comes down to the fact that despite going through surgeries and chemical treatments, transgender folks still have their original chromosomes. As such, even if it sounds dickish, people should be able to refer that person by their biological gender based on chromosomes. Now I had this huge argument with him about doctors, government's and sporting authorities all starting to agree on transgender people with their new gender, and if it's good enough with them, I think there's merits to it. He just says that it's due to leftist pressure and that's why these officials caved. I am at a loss of what I can say to convince him 😰 how do you even convince those people?
He
Is reading the OP that hard? The teacher refused to call a trans male student "he". Literally first line of the quoted article:
I taught several classes back as a graduate student and I can't think of why I would even be using any pronouns. That may be due to the subject matter I taught never lent itself to discussions where I needed to refer to a student while talking to a different student. While I never did remember even half of my student's names, if someone personally requested a different pronoun, I think it would be trivial to just remember their name and remove any pronoun use entirely.
So having gone through some teaching, I can say that if this issue comes up repeatedly about the same student, it simply means the teacher is doing this maliciously.
This reminds me of the time when I was talking to a friend and he said he shares Ben Shapiro's view on refusing to call transgender folks by their new preferred pronouns. It comes down to the fact that despite going through surgeries and chemical treatments, transgender folks still have their original chromosomes. As such, even if it sounds dickish, people should be able to refer that person by their biological gender based on chromosomes. Now I had this huge argument with him about doctors, government's and sporting authorities all starting to agree on transgender people with their new gender, and if it's good enough with them, I think there's merits to it. He just says that it's due to leftist pressure and that's why these officials caved. I am at a loss of what I can say to convince him 😰 how do you even convince those people?
He also used an example that let's say Trump said something unscientific about climate change and somebody can sound like a total jerk to Trump to tell him why he's wrong and point to the science. Basically, he said it's ok because sometimes truth hurts.
A twin study published in the International Journal of Transgenderism found that 33% of identical twin pairs were both trans, compared to only 2.6% of non-identical twins who were raised in the same family at the same time, but were not genetically identical."
(Source: http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2010to2014/2013-transsexuality.html)
"Several studies have found a correlation between gender identity and brain structure.[7] A first-of-its-kind study by Zhou et al. (1995) found that in a region of the brain called the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BSTc), a region which is known for sex and anxiety responses (and which is affected by prenatal androgens),[8] male-to-female trans women had a female-normal BSTc size (like cisgender women) and female-to-male trans men had a male-normal size. While the transsexuals studied had taken hormones, this was accounted for by including non-transsexual male and female controls who, for a variety of medical reasons, had experienced hormone reversal. The controls still had sizes typical for their gender. No relationship to sexual orientation was found"
(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_transsexuality#Brain_structure)
"David Peter Reimer was a Canadian man born physically male but reassigned as a girl and raised female following medical advice and intervention after his penis was accidentally destroyed during a botched circumcision in infancy.
Psychologist John Money oversaw the case and reported the reassignment as successful and as evidence that gender identity is primarily learned. Academic sexologist Milton Diamond later reported that Reimer's realization he was not a girl crystallized between the ages of 9 and 11, and he transitioned to living as a male at age 15. Well known in medical circles for years anonymously as the "John/Joan" case, Reimer later went public with his story to help discourage similar medical practices. He later committed suicide after suffering years of severe depression, financial instability, and a troubled marriage"
(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer)
Look up Contrapoints on Youtube. She has a video called "Pronouns" that deals with this exact issue. In fact, she illustrated her points using a video with Ben Shapiro and a right wing trans woman discussing pronouns, the the right wing trans woman actually has an excellent analogy explaining why it's not just polite, but logical and proper to refer to a trans person by their preferred pronouns.This reminds me of the time when I was talking to a friend and he said he shares Ben Shapiro's view on refusing to call transgender folks by their new preferred pronouns. It comes down to the fact that despite going through surgeries and chemical treatments, transgender folks still have their original chromosomes. As such, even if it sounds dickish, people should be able to refer that person by their biological gender based on chromosomes. Now I had this huge argument with him about doctors, government's and sporting authorities all starting to agree on transgender people with their new gender, and if it's good enough with them, I think there's merits to it. He just says that it's due to leftist pressure and that's why these officials caved. I am at a loss of what I can say to convince him 😰 how do you even convince those people?
He also used an example that let's say Trump said something unscientific about climate change and somebody can sound like a total jerk to Trump to tell him why he's wrong and point to the science. Basically, he said it's ok because sometimes truth hurts.
Basically these kinds of arguments exist because they don't know the science behind all of it. They feel that trans people are just making it all up for who knows what reason. When someone brings up something like that, I think its helpful to point towards the biological aspects as well as the ridiculous of relying on chromosomes for people.
The vast majority of people have never had a karyotype test done and do not know their exact chromosomes. Most people can make the reasonable assumption that if they're male that they have XY, but that's not always the case. There are people who have XY chromosomes and without any outside intervention go through a female puberty completely. This is known as XY androgen insensitivity syndrome. There is a lot more variance to chromosomes past XX and XY as well, but just that example on its own should be enough to realize it's not that simple. You could also ask your friend what he would do if he had a karyotype test that revealed he was XX. Would he suddenly identify as a woman, or what realistically would that change for him in his life?
Beyond that, trying to say that it's unscientific to be trans ignores that while we don't know the specific reason that makes someone trans, we can tell that there is a biological component to it somewhere. You can read more about it in these examples :
I did pull this thread together a while back as well, which might help you to better explain things to your friend if you need to. And if you have any questions about it, feel free to ask in that thread or PM me.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/transgender-101.25656/