Who the hell is the target audience for this show?
It was more common in the earlier part of her career when her songs bounced between "we're together" and "we're broken up" and people i knew used them as such to denote their relationships. It's a very old and very played out joke/insult.They literally used her as an insult. Didn't know that was a common image people had of her. Who made this show.
It's just bad writing. The 2010 joke to reference isn't that Swift was a slut, it was that if you dated her she was going to write her next song about you.
how dare they make a taylor swift joke in 2021 that doesn't make fun of cottage core
i remember the pitchfork lady that gave lover a mixed review had to lock her account because the swifties were posting her address and private photos while telling her to kill herself
yeah, they probably just inferred it from blank space (got a long list of ex-lovers is the literal lyric iirc)... do people still listen to that song by choice? only place i hear now is the grocery store.
There's really no need to belittle and downplay the fact that she defended herself against a sexist joke.
What some of her fans did to a writer a few years ago (which is clearly wrong, if that did happen) has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
And then asking, "Do people even listen to that song anymore?" just adds an extra layer to how you're framing this.
The 'joke' isn't a personal attack at me.Talk about being over sensitive. Clearly the joke is not meant as a personal attack.
What if only stupid, sexist, unfunny jokes get removed? Do you think the content will be missed?It's a deeply stupid, sexist, unfunny joke but hoo boy if we start a trend of celebrities getting jokes about them removed… we will have a lot less content.
I'm kinda amazed the mods are just letting all this misogyny fester in this thread.
I'm kinda amazed the mods are just letting all this misogyny/excusing of sexist shit fester in this thread.
Your example actually illustrates the point.
Men are often lauded for having lots of relationships. Usually, at worst, they are teased about it in a friendly "wink wink you sly dog" sort of way.
Women on the other hand, get to be labeled as promiscuous sluts for the exact same behavior. And I would argue for far lower thresholds of the same behavior. It's sexist and misogynist.
I understand why someone would make the "don't censor art/media" argument, but this is a low bar. We can totally push Netlflix/society in general to excise this specific type of joke from our lexicon, and the world will be no poorer for it.
Just gonna wait for that slippery slope reply now
Probably spent too many years siding with Kanye..and are stuck in that rut, despite the stuff that came to light.
Your statement boils down to:Do you know how much content, quality or garbage that Netflix actively produces? It would be a herculean task.
What if only stupid, sexist, unfunny jokes get removed? Do you think the content will be missed?
Your statement boils down to:
"I gave people money to make stuff but I can't possibly do the HARD WORK of not paying them a 2nd time if they make sexist trash".
You are supporting the status quo in this manner. May I ask whether you think the status quo is a good place to be, on the issue of misogyny in fiction?
It is a super lazy joke entirely created with the idea that Taylor Swift used to write "I'm in love" songs, followed by "I'm broken up" songs. It's a joke that was lame when it was common 5 years ago, and is even worse now that she has been in a stable relationship for years now...
Like, who are these lame writers?
people that want to make pop culture references in the most absolutely lazy way possible
You are passively doing so by supporting the status quo, if fiction is currently leaning in a misogynistic way. This is education, I don't have to put words in your mouth to explain what you are doing.I don't support misogyny in fiction. Don't put words in my mouth.
Probably. And I have no idea how. Kanye has gone out of his way to antagonize Taylor for years. Him and his ex-wife are both petty assholes.Not talking about era members specifically, but I think Kanye and Kim were really instrumental in making Taylor Swift seem like a villain to a lot of people.
I disagree that applying critical thinking to what one purchases, as a corporation, is any sort of slippery slope that will destroy comedy.The problem is the precedent - one could say the Jenna Maroney character on 30 Rock is sexist as her primary character trait is all her failed relationships / flings (and insecurity and…). That entire show would be gone. Nobody is hiring an editor to figure it out, they would just delete it.
It's a tricky path to walk. My personal opinion is that a disclaimer like Disney+ is preferable to wiping the slate of anything that could ever offend anyone. And, of course, knock it off so you don't have to do this again.
Note: I'm talking about things on the lower / more nebulous side of the spectrum. Horrible stuff of course should be relegated to the trash bin.
I'm sure I'm not the only person reporting posters in this thread. Not to mention this thread is currently like a beacon in Etcetera(controversial threads usually are) You'd think they would have noticed by now.They can't always jump on everything quickly. If no one is reporting anything, it depends on who's around/looking at the thread.
I'm sure they'll take a look eventually.
You are passively doing so by supporting the status quo, if fiction is currently leaning in a misogynistic way. This is education, I don't have to put words in your mouth to explain what you are doing.
The status quo of all fiction?What's the status quo? I know nothing about this show or it's stars. If it's men who wrote it, yeah okay fuck them. If it's women, it's not my place to tell women what they can or cannot write. It seems like the show was created by a woman, with female leads, and mostly female executive producers.
Netflix will edit out the joke, make a mia culpa, (it's already trending on Twitter thanks to Taylor's fans) and Netflix will quietly cancel the show and throw the writers under the bus.
Whats sexist about it tho? She dated a bunch of guys, that's fact... what am I missing?
I also know nothing about this show and its stars/writers. I haven't watched it. However, I am commenting on the commentary. Since you also haven't watched it, why are you in here complaining about taylor swift's behavior?
Women are not immune from writing sexist trash and also shouldn't be paid to do it. This is not a controversial statement.
Well, the thread has officially pulled in the low post count alt-accounts.
My bad, I guess I shouln't ask questions until I'm at the 42k post range. Sorry.
I disagree that applying critical thinking to what one purchases, as a corporation, is any sort of slippery slope that will destroy comedy.
It may improve comedy but it isn't going to get to "ever offend anyone" levels. This argument is the standard basic argument used by misogynists and racists when stuff they think is funny by virtue of being simple misogyny and racism gets the least bit of criticism.
Using the same argument doesn't put one in good company. One might consider that a bit before using the argument.
You shouldn't use your low post alt account to perpetuate sexism no.My bad, I guess I shouln't ask questions until I'm at the 42k post range. Sorry.
That's a big jump. Nothing that poster said supports misogyny in fiction. He simply said Netflix vetting their content is a huge task which is most likely why they aren't doing it.Your statement boils down to:
"I gave people money to make stuff but I can't possibly do the HARD WORK of not paying them a 2nd time if they make sexist trash".
You are supporting the status quo in this manner. May I ask whether you think the status quo is a good place to be, on the issue of misogyny in fiction?
Sure, ok. But doesn't the money source also have some responsibility to review what they paid for? Because if they get a result that doesn't gel with their own mission statement [yes this is assuming they have one], then they should not use the provider again. Or, if it DOES gel with their mission statement, they can be assumed to agree with the content.I didn't say it was a controversial statement. I, in fact, agree with your statement.
I don't believe I was commenting on Taylor Swift's behavior, I believe I was suggesting that her issue is not with Netflix, but with the creatives.
Not doing the huge tasks because it's too hard just perpetuates issues. Until when should it be put off?That's a big jump. Nothing that poster said supports misogyny in fiction. He simply said Netflix vetting their content is a huge task which is most likely why they aren't doing it.
That's a big jump. Nothing that poster said supports misogyny in fiction. He simply said Netflix vetting their content is a huge task which is most likely why they aren't doing it.
Shaming her for doing the same thing men do simply because she's a woman.Whats sexist about it tho? She dated a bunch of guys, that's fact... what am I missing?
Executives offering input and guiding a production from its inception all the way through the edit and reshoot process is very much a thing in TV Production. Showrunners don't produce in a vacuum, they ALWAYS answer to the people producing, distributing, and bankrolling it every step of the way.That's a big jump. Nothing that poster said supports misogyny in fiction. He simply said Netflix vetting their content is a huge task which is most likely why they aren't doing it.
She did not date "a bunch of guys." She dated a normal amount of people, like anyone else would in their life. And she's being shamed for it. That is sexist.
It has been explained in this thread what makes it sexist so I don't believe your "question" was asked in good faith.
Hey, I'm not excusing them not doing the vetting. Hell, they don't produce THAT much content... Youtube has it way worse and you can see how things fall through the cracks.Sure, ok. But doesn't the money source also have some responsibility to review what they paid for? Because if they get a result that doesn't gel with their own mission statement [yes this is assuming they have one], then they should not use the provider again. Or, if it DOES gel with their mission statement, they can be assumed to agree with the content.
I'm saying Netflix is a reasonable "person" to @ on twitter, basically.
Not doing the huge tasks because it's too hard just perpetuates issues. Until when should it be put off?
At least beyond the surface level stuff.
Stuff like this slips by more often than you think, especially if your typically hands-offs with your creatives as Netflix appears to be.
Often times big places like these are beholden to the content creators original vision, as shit as it may be.
I certainly understand that and are aware of how showrunners answer to studios. But none of us here knows for sure how Netflix validates/vets their content for this type of stuff. And I don't think simply mentioning that means you support misogyny.Executives offering input and guiding a production from its inception all the way through the edit and reshoot process is very much a thing in TV Production. Showrunners don't produce in a vacuum, they ALWAYS answer to the people producing, distributing, and bankrolling it every step of the way.
Talk about being over sensitive. Clearly the joke is not meant as a personal attack.