May I introduce you to the wonderful and terrible world of Yakuza model swaps?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSO3BsOPJsE
Well what may seems "boring" to you is efficiency for the bats. He's a trained ninja, so perhaps he is constantly aware of his energy and stamina levels, and he saves any kind of physical movement for fighting his enemies or/and scaling and grappling off buildings etc.It just shows what a bore Bats is. Just stood there like a plank of wood.
I don't get the "catwoman's movements (animation) is too sexualized" argument up in here, out of all female comic book characters, isn't she pretty much a seductive, visually distracting, S&M jewel thief in PVC that also happens to have some fighting chops?
At first it's like, "hmm this doesn't seem too--" and then before you can finish that thought you see THE IDLES.May I introduce you to the wonderful and terrible world of Yakuza model swaps?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSO3BsOPJsE
Yeah in the rush to moralize this model swap people seem to have forgotten what the character is like and how she is usually portrayed in media. Nothing about this was overtly sexual, and even if it was, are sexy characters that act like that not allowed to exist?I'm not sure exactly what message people are attempting to pull from this other than humor. Men and women generally have different body language and it's exaggerating the difference further given its comic book origins. Of course it's silly to see Batman imitating a cat in the most feminine way possible, because that's not his character.
Part of the reason a certain topic here is literally Hundreds of pages long: https://www.resetera.com/threads/wh...ave-no-pants-and-i-must-scream-read-op.65064/
Edit: Posting for posterity...
Not in my realm
There's a significance between a confident sassy strut and acting like the preamble to a porn scene.I don't get the "catwoman's movements (animation) is too sexualized" argument up in here, out of all female comic book characters, isn't she pretty much a seductive, visually distracting, S&M jewel thief in PVC that also happens to have some fighting chops? I don't usually care for Anne Hathaway's dramatic acting, but she nailed it as Catwoman with her psychical acting in one of them Nolan Bats movies.
Its also to comment on reddits current frontpage
Yeah, the point of Catwoman is to be over the top.I don't get the "catwoman's movements (animation) is too sexualized" argument up in here, out of all female comic book characters, isn't she pretty much a seductive, visually distracting, S&M jewel thief in PVC that also happens to have some fighting chops? I don't usually care for Anne Hathaway's dramatic acting, but she nailed it as Catwoman with her psychical acting in one of them Nolan Bats movies.
Yeah, the point of Catwoman is to be over the top.
I guess next time they can just stare at each other, broad shouldered and brooding
But this model swap will never look not odd unless you do that.There is no single "point of catwoman" that necessitates such a one-note portrayal. If it's tradition, it can and should be changed for the better.
If you don't care about that character's portrayal or those of women characters in general, that's fine. No need to frame it as a false dichotomy between "walking sexualised female stereotype" and "non-emotive slab of stone."
"If she's not dislocating her pelvis while walking, then what could she possibly do????" 😂
But this model swap will never look not odd unless you do that.
From what I read in other threads I also thought people had more of a problem with sexualized characters who actually aren't sexual themselves. In case of Catwoman it is an inherent part of her personality and I don't think that needs to change
Don't be a ProZD skit.Well what may seems "boring" to you is efficiency for the bats. He's a trained ninja, so perhaps he is constantly aware of his energy and stamina levels, and he saves any kind of physical movement for fighting his enemies or/and scaling and grappling off buildings etc.
I feel like that's contradicting. Exactly because they're not real but a character in a comic book game it's okay to be one note.The character isn't a real person. They don't need to adhere to one characteristic and nothing more
I don't mind the idea of expanding her character but this seems to me more like taking a characteristic away than just adding.Her screen time throughout the series is nothing more than than "sexy temptress thief" even when there's opportunity for more than that. There's compelling backstory in the first game she showed up in, but you'd never know that without listing to audio logs.
I feel like that's contradicting. Exactly because they're not real but a character in a comic book game it's okay to be one note.
I don't mind the idea of expanding her character but this seems to me more like taking a characteristic away than just adding.
I reached that conclusion because it's all about how she shouldn't be animated that wayAnd it's simultaneously ok for them to not be one-note and also not a prominent reductive stereotype who is used as just a hostage to save for the longest side quest in the game.
Her being more than that one tired trope and getting character moments that explore motivation or feelings beyond "alluring cat burglar" would not "take a characteristic away." That makes no sense and it's confusing how someone could reach that conclusion