What you mean "still"? Isn't that their goal?
Why wouldn't they? This is what they want.
They did previously try to hide specific views like this. In the past this would absolutely get someone pulled in favor of someone who may be against it but not specifically.
Is it? When abortion is illegal they have no single issue bullshit to campaign on anymore.
I can't wait for Susan Collins' irate press conference where she announces that she won't be bullied into voting against a nominee that betrays everything she's ever promised her home state she wouldn't allow from the Republican party.
No, the court isn't the only hope here. Far from it.
Is it? When abortion is illegal they have no single issue bullshit to campaign on anymore.
No, the court isn't the only hope here. Far from it.
The Court isn't going to strike down Roe v. Wade and thus make abortion illegal.
The Court would strike down Roe and remove it as a constitutional right, allowing states to regulate it freely. Meaning Alabama will ban it entirely, for example.
Congress can pass the Roe Act and legalize/expand abortion access nationwide.
I get what you're saying but I don't know if their keikaku will come to fruition. They've made the crucial mistake of doing nothing of substance to win this election, risking it all when a coherent D supermajority fixes everything fast enough to make Repub heads spin(and ffs they BETTER).If no to abortions, yes to gerrymandering, yes to low corporate taxes, no to strict environmental regulations, and no to Medicare 4 All are written in stone by the Supreme Court for the next 40 years will Republicans even care about winning democratic elections anymore?
Of course they do: they just flip it to push message vote Republican to keep abortion illegal.Is it? When abortion is illegal they have no single issue bullshit to campaign on anymore.
Mainly because until the election the GOP are trying to play dumb and pretend she isn't trying to eliminate Roe v Wade to protect vulnerable senators. Trump did this at the debate, pretending we don't know how she'd rule on Roe v Wade.That's the whole reason she was picked, so not really a surprise. Why even bother trying to hide a 14 year old newspaper ad?
What's the argument for not simply overturning Roe for creating a right that isn't enumerated in the constitution, rejecting the penumbras argument, but reading the constitution to have a different penumbra anti-right that establishes abortion as an unconstitutional act?Anything that Congress can pass, a partisan court can shut down. See: the Voting Rights act, which had zero chance of ever being touched by popular vote. Or the ACA, which is currently enjoying historical levels of support (>65%).
That's weak though and they know it. Voting to change/overturn something bringOf course they do: they just flip it to push message vote Republican to keep abortion illegal.
It's an issue that works either way for them and always identified opposition as being on the other side of the issue.
I get what you're saying but I don't know if their keikaku will come to fruition. They've made the crucial mistake of doing nothing of substance to win this election, risking it all when a coherent D supermajority fixes everything fast enough to make Repub heads spin(and ffs they BETTER).
This is the point I was making about Democrats fixing and quite frankly flipping the entire court power plan by R's on its head, expanding the supreme court at the first opportunity.Republicans have been so obsessed with court stacking because they know that demographic trends don't favor them.
......................
Expanding federal courts and if necessary, the Supreme Court may be essential to preserve any spirit of democracy.
I think you may be conflating what politicians say they want and what they really want - power.If no to abortions, yes to gerrymandering, yes to low corporate taxes, no to strict environmental regulations, and no to Medicare 4 All are written in stone by the Supreme Court for the next 40 years will Republicans even care about winning democratic elections anymore?
There will be fringe groups angling for the repeal of the CRA, but they'll have gotten everything they wanted for their lifetimes.
There's always the scare that it'll come back. They basically got their 2nd Amendment victory with DC v Heller but that doesn't stop them from running on guns.Wouldn't it be better to continue chipping away at abortion rights as they've been doing with great success? Eliminating Roe would also deprive them of what is perhaps the largest motivating factor for lower education single issue voters. It also sparks what would inevitably be a large liberal backlash that would shred lower level elections against them.
Delay the inevitable for four years!
No we fucking don't, Mr. Keith.