Never the damn mind. 64 and Sunshine aren't 60 FPS and 64 is a straight port. Fuck off Nintendo. Keeping it digital limited so people forget about it quickly.
I know you didn't ask me, but for me it would have been a good collection if:
Indeed. I don't like the insecurity that comes with owning an "available for a limited-time only" digital game from Nintendo. But I also play all my games digital on Switch and don't cartridge swap (BotW is the only physical game I own and it's never left that slot haha).
we better temper our expectations for the Prime Trilogy "Remaster". We'll be lucky if they actually bump up the resolution to 720p.
They're going to release a Super Mario Whoops! All Stars! Collection with just Mario Galaxy 1 and 2 later :DHow can it be an 'all-stars' collection when only one of them is set in space
If I buy the collection on the eShop, would I be able to download it again from my account after March 2021? You know, since maybe I need the storage for other games.
I would suppose yes, but I wouldn't put it past Nintendo to lose the game forever lol.
I know. I'm still buying it because I'm a sucker for this shit and the nostalgia for Galaxy is too strong.
However "people still buy it," shouldn't be an catch-all excuse to stop people from demanding more from what they do buy. The rules of supply and demand aren't the rules everyone has to follow when creating their opinion.
If I buy the collection on the eShop, would I be able to download it again from my account after March 2021? You know, since maybe I need the storage for other games.
I would suppose yes, but I wouldn't put it past Nintendo to lose the game forever lol.
Look, it's a sore spot for me. :P
I get that Nintendo has to shut down fanmade improvements to their games to "protect their IP", but more and more every day it really feels like:
"We need to protect our IP" = "We don't want this stuff making our stuff look bad. Because it definitely does."
Are you seeing people predicting this will be a sales flop? All I see is people upset with the complete lack of effort.This thread will prove the "screw Nintendo" era is a bubble when the collection is a massive success sales wide.
If SMG2 was coming down the line as DLC they would've toad us already. Don't do this to yourself.
I see what you did there.If SMG2 was coming down the line as DLC they would've toad us already. Don't do this to yourself.
If SMG2 was coming down the line as DLC they would've toad us already. Don't do this to yourself.
It's the exact thing that was rumored that you refused to believe. I told you, they were going to port 3 games and release them.So essentially i can already play all of this on my PC right now with far more improvements. Sunshine already has a mod that raises the framerate to 60 and the "Sunburn" mod adds a ton of QOL changes to the game that make it far more enjoyable. This collection has none of that. Is there any good excuse for this collection being so unbelievably half arsed in every single way? No Galaxy 2 either, which is one of the best games in the series. Limited? What even is this?
Super Mario 3D Most-stars!
I know you didn't ask me, but for me it would have been a good collection if:
Any bigger changes, (especially for 64 and Sunshine) would have been awesome, but that would've gone above and beyond. The above points should have just been there. The Switch can handle that.
- Galaxy 2 was included
- Every game was 1080p, widescreen and 60 fps
Mario's importance for Nintendo can literally not be overstated, so yeah: people expected them to go all-out for a 35th anniversary collection.
Instead they managed to announce a collection that is not only incomplete, but the games that are included look unimpressive.
I think calling Nintendo lazy for this is understandable, but that's not directed at the developers (I know they work hard and don't make the calls), but at the higher-ups.
Lol, there's nothing to be proven. Of course it's gonna sell well. It's three 3D Mario games in one package, releasing on one of the best-selling consoles ever in a period where there's few high-profile games competing with it.This thread will prove the "screw Nintendo" era is a bubble when the collection is a massive success sales wide.
How is making a full Gamecube emulator "lowest effort"? That's a whole lotta work. The lack of 60fps support isn't due to "effort", not once you are emulating the game; it's a development choice.I was actually disappointed that Nintendo did the lowest effort with this collection, still going to buy it since I grew up playing those games and I know I will enjoy them.
Yep, but they know the game will sell anyway because it's Mario.With all the other quality remasters and collections being released out there, and often for a competitive price, this is a legit garbage effort from Nintendo.
Lol, watch Galaxy 2 be included on the Game & Watch as one of the '35 little touches' :^)I agree, I hope Galaxy 2 is DLC or something. I imagine they must have something in mind for it.
The main thing, as you said, is that calling developers lazy is completely uncalled for and inappropriate. Saying Nintendo is lazy is entirely different, although I still personally wouldn't.