You're right, it would be more productive for me to spend my time caping for cops on a video game forum.No, those one-liners are ways for people to feel good about themselves while they sit at home and do nothing to help the people being murdered.
Is it? When people say legalized gang, they're not like, joking. It's not hyperbole.That is a huge false equivalency. Come on, we better than that on ERA.
Who's caping for cops?You're right, it would be more productive for me to spend my time caping for cops on a video game forum.
Should anyone who wants to help maintain the law become a vigilante instead?
What is with people (and I mean Right-leaning people) trying to co-opt the 4th of July as being a way to celebrate the military and Vets? We got Veteran's Day and Memorial Day, yo. 4th of July is about the NATION'S Independence. It's for EVERYBODY. One could argue that soldiers were important to that independance, and I'd say, yeah, those Vets of the Revolutionary War should be saluted, but I doubt you'd fine many around nowadays.
If a cop ordering a drink at Starbucks makes you that uncomfortable you got some issues.
Yes. I would trust a guy going around making citizens arrests before a cop.Should anyone who wants to help maintain the law become a vigilante instead?
Is it now?It's a strange embellishment you've added there, but you do you.
So why do minorities feel uncomfortable around cops and try to avoid them?It is a false equivalency. It's like when gun owners say, "But knives are weapons too!" when in reality a knife is a tool and can be considered a weapon as an optional thing. To say cops are analogous to murderers misrepresents what a cop is on a fundamental level: law enforcement.
Studies show, for example, that officers are quicker to shoot black suspects in video game simulations. Josh Correll, a University of Colorado Boulder psychology professor who conducted the research, said it's possible the bias could lead to more skewed outcomes in the field. "In the very situation in which [officers] most need their training," he said, "we have some reason to believe that their training will be most likely to fail them."
Lmao!!this thread will experience severe whiplash when its revealed it was a middle aged white soccer mom who asked for the cops to be removed
On average, Phoenix police were involved in a shooting every eight days in 2018.
I used to work at the Century Theaters in Aurora, Colorado and that rings like a large possibility.this thread will experience severe whiplash when its revealed it was a middle aged white soccer mom who asked for the cops to be removed
Jesus fucking Christ at the posts on this thread.
This forum is no better then neogaf, if not worse!
Ban me permanently if you want.
Considering the pettiness of police:
Jesus fucking Christ at the posts on this thread.
This forum is no better then neogaf, if not worse!
Ban me permanently if you want.
I mean, I would definitely enjoy that since you havent even bothered to articulate your position in the tiniest way.Jesus fucking Christ at the posts on this thread.
This forum is no better then neogaf, if not worse!
Ban me permanently if you want.
this thread will experience severe whiplash when its revealed it was a middle aged white soccer mom who asked for the cops to be removed
They don't even have a legal requirement to protect you.Considering the pettiness of police:
"911 what's your emergency?"
"PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO SMASH INTO MY STORE. THEY HAVE GUNS AND SAY THEY'RE GOING TO KILL ME! SEND HELP!"
"Alright, the police are on their way."
"Attempted robbery and possible harm at 123 Fake Street. Suspects are armed."
"Hmm, they did say we can't buy donuts there. Let's take our time."
Absolutely true. Not an option for small businesses but big corps like Starbucks can take the L. Maybe donut shops as well. Who really has more power in the cop-donut shop paradigm?Considering the pettiness of police:
"911 what's your emergency?"
"PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO SMASH INTO MY STORE. THEY HAVE GUNS AND SAY THEY'RE GOING TO KILL ME! SEND HELP!"
"Alright, the police are on their way."
"Attempted robbery and possible harm at 123 Fake Street. Suspects are armed."
"Hmm, they did say we can't buy donuts there. Let's take our time."
That's the irony of all of that crap, cops are purposely dress up in the way that would be intimidating.Cops these days look militaristic and threatening af. Now every officer looks like SWAT.
It doesn't have to be that way, but it is. and they signed up for it.
On thinking further (partly prompted by pride), I am a bit more divided on the matter as if a gay customer was asked to leave at the request of some other homophobic customer for making them uncomfortable I think it would be totally outrageous and unacceptable. As such, if they were simply just standing there and drinking the coffee (and not engaging in any other threatening behaviour aside from them being police) I think the request probably shouldn't have been made.
Cops regularly detain and arrest people without a shred of proof that their detainees have done anything to anyone. And no one's obligated to take their side in these cases, and yet bigots regularly do.Just as long as we're in agreement that there is not a shred of proof so far that these cops did anything to anyone, and no one's under any obligation to take the side of the barista or the patron.
We're still like...rational human beings, yes?
Just as long as we're in agreement that there is not a shred of proof so far that these cops did anything to anyone, and no one's under any obligation to take the side of the barista or the patron.
We're still like...rational human beings, yes?
This is the core of it: Normalizing being asked to leave simply for existing will go very badly for minorities, as they are after all, minorities.I'm torn on this a little. The situation with extreme police brutality, systemic racism and abuse of force is well documented, we all know that. I don't have any sympathy for bad actors.
But it feels like a bit of a slippery slope too. It appears they were standing there drinking their drinks. I'm Muslim and my wife wears a hijab for example. Would I be obligated to do the same if someone said they were uncomfortable around us?
Cops regularly detain and arrest people without a shred of proof that their detainees have done anything to anyone. And no one's obligated to take their side in these cases, and yet bigots regularly do.
So it's not surprising that people would be uncomfortable around them. It should be the least surprising event. Especially in this part of Arizona, where this happened, where cops regularly detain and harass latinx people with prejudice. Being uncomfortable with cops is the rational response until cops stop power tripping and racially profiling.
Just as long as we're in agreement that there is not a shred of proof so far that these cops did anything to anyone,
bLuE BloOdS, bLuE LiVeSBefore someone goes and talk about "slippery slopes", being a cop is an occupation. You can't choose what ethnicity you're born as.
The cops were not denied service. They were asked to avoid loitering. If they want to be treated like a pedestrian then they should dress down on their breaks so that they don't come off as the militants they are.Cops exhibit indefensible behavior on a regular basis. I agree. I'm just saying there's no evidence of that here. I don't like fucking cops following me. One followed me to a drive through one time. It made me uncomfortable. I don't think he should be denied a milkshake at Mcdonald's though.
Fear in the American police force is absolutely rational. I don't think it's unreasonable for anybody to be uncomfortable in the presence of police. I agree with almost everything you said, and yet I think the bolded is wrong.Terrible comparison. They chose to be cops, with full knowledge of public perception of that occupation. A job and a sexual orientation are not equivalent things and it's ridiculous to compare them in this circumstance. And even if it weren't ridiculous, the homophobe is irrational in his fear, while the customer afraid of police violence is simply informed. Yeah yeah, "not all cops" or whatever. "Not all airline passengers," too, in fact almost literally NO airline passengers, but I still have to take my fucking shoes off before I get on a plane, don't I?
If the cops were basically loitering around, standing and not sitting, I have no problem believing that would make some people uncomfortable and find the request to be reasonable.
Cops aren't judged as intimidating because all of the are proven murderers. They are judged as such because they exist in a system where any given cop can murder someone and get away with it. The fact that you don't know which individuals will go on to murder someone doesn't make that fact any less palatable.Cops exhibit indefensible behavior on a regular basis. I agree. I'm just saying there's no evidence of that here.