Just came back from my viewing. Palpatine was really shoehorned in. No mentioning or build-up in the two previous movies, and now he's suddenly the big baddie again?
I mean, I take every second of Ian McDiarmid I can get because he's awesome, but his appearance here feels unearned somehow.
I'm trying to phrase it in a way that makes sense:
The Emperor was the Big Bad, yet he didn't feel as if he was. He was giving commands to the Final Order, but he came out of bloody nowhere. Even at the end when he's telling the Final Order to not succumb to the Resistance's attacks and shot lightning at the sky, I felt as if he was peripheral to the First/Final Order because there was no mention of him controlling anything for the past two movies.
It was a weird feeling. Snoke felt in control in 7 and 8, we knew there was an Emperor in 4 and saw a glimpse of him in 5, and we saw him controlling things in the prequels. Here, he just comes back, and thus his position as the main antagonist is underwhelming despite how creepy he looks and how powerful he is in this.
Hot Take: I get the appeal of Rey Nobody, but all the protagonists in the "skywalker saga" come from important bloodlines, it only makes sense for Rey to follow suit.
Qui-Gon didn't. It was really mostly Vader-Luke-Leia, with the antagonist of this one being related to Han.
The issue is that JJ Abrams seems to think bloodlines are cool because they're in Star Wars, when things are cool because they're cool and earned. Vader was not originally planned to be Luke's father, but his reveal as being his father subverted all expectations (sounds familiar!) for Luke and the audience. And there was a payoff to it, a huge, phenomenal payoff. Rey finding a place in this story on her own is more interesting than somehow being Palpatine's granddaughter.