It's very frustrating and one of the potential issues I saw when the Pro consoles were initially revealed. It's maddening that it's never reflected in reviews, as you say. I imagine most reviews are based off the Pro consoles. I feel like Digital Foundry is damn near the only place I can rely on getting a good feel for how well a game runs on base consoles anymore.
Well, here's the thing...
Well...it also shows how image treatment has improved. Battlefield 4 was a launch game running at 720p with lousy AA on Xbox One. Jedi uses Unreal's temporal upsampling producing a MUCH cleaner picture than BF4. So while it's still low-res, it has improved.
I wonder if we'll be saying the same thing a few years into the next gen cycle.
What about 30 fps mode? I doubt performance mode can reach a stable 60 fps in any kind of next future. 1440p on the X speaks for itself how demanding is it on console.
You have to define "playable" for yourself, but by all accounts it's certainly better than the XB1S.
It's 30fps most of the time but it also drops when loading new areas.
Thing is, its non-existent Gears 5.
Yes, but that game was running at 60fs. As is often the case the two situations are not that comparable.
Not surprising regarding Xbox One S performance. The performance gap between S and X is higher than 720p-1440p.
Maybe. But I believe that won't change much in the next few years. The rate at which games are needing more and more power is getting ridiculous. (in a good way).
To be fair the PS4 Pro also freezes for a couple of seconds which is inexcusable. Now it makes sense why games like God of War force you to climb so slowly while its loading assets.
HahaDark1x , Dictator you guys have the patience of saints.
Working your asses off to get this kind of content out Day 1 without even being able to receive an earlier copy of the game:
Then having to put up with nonsense from these threads:
The rest of us lurking and mostly silent are extremely grateful for your efforts!
