-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order PC performance thread
- Thread starter GrrImAFridge
- Start date
Do turning down any of the settings help at all with the brief stutters? Playing on a 2080, game is running well at 1440, but it does hitch here and there...
Perfect. My gaming laptop has the 6GB 1060 with 16GB of RAM and an 8th gen i7 processor. Also a 1080p FHD screen so I should get high settings then.
Thanks
Nyaaaaa....
Steam doesn't unlock until tomorrow...
I assume it will run great on my computer. Pushing for max settings @ 1800p60, or 1620p60 at the very least if not possible.
3900x overclocked
16gb DDR4 3200mhz @ 3600mhz + tightened timing
1080Ti overclocked
Wish I could play naooooooow
:(
Steam doesn't unlock until tomorrow...
I assume it will run great on my computer. Pushing for max settings @ 1800p60, or 1620p60 at the very least if not possible.
3900x overclocked
16gb DDR4 3200mhz @ 3600mhz + tightened timing
1080Ti overclocked
Wish I could play naooooooow
:(
What would you guess on a 2080Ti? I've got a 9900k+2080ti in my rig.
Sounds like there's some stuttering issues. I may wait on a patch before jumping in. Been doing this lately, doing it with RDR2 now.
At 4k? Easily. I managed 40 fps 4k on epic with a 2080. Got a locked 60 at 1800p with epic settings.
Should work yeah, but new Zealand and australia are premium locations. Installed f-secure, worked like a charm.
Thanks for the advice.
Last edited:
Steam seems to be the red-headed step child these days, always to get games last. I thought I might be able to grab the key for Jedi Fallen Order and install via Origin, but no such luck. Different release dates is bullshit.
i5 9600k
2080ti
16GB DDR4 RAM
1TB SSD
Game is running sensationally for me @ 1440p. I'm north of 60fps without breaking a sweat. The game looks gorgeous by the way.
2080ti
16GB DDR4 RAM
1TB SSD
Game is running sensationally for me @ 1440p. I'm north of 60fps without breaking a sweat. The game looks gorgeous by the way.
Interesting. Guess that bodes well for a 2080 Super + i9-9900k @ 1440p.
Mostly 60 fps, but I'm not very far in (first planet). Cutscenes will drop to 50ish, which isn't a big deal imo. There is a adaptive resolution option, should smooth out the small fps drops here and there.
I would have to update my steam store country to play it, right? VPN is already connected to New Zealand. I don't like that it states I can't change country back for two weeks.
I just got a c9 yesterday and I played some fallen order on 2560 x1440 @ locked 60fps and I have to tell you
its a fucking experience
I had a pg27uq and I had to return it awhile ago because of that haloing issue. I was using alienware ultrawide, but man this c9 kicks ass
I thought I would use 4k60 more, but I'm ok with 1440@120hz. RDR2 is also a sight to behold
rig: 9900k/2080ti custom loop
Last edited:
Locked 4k/60/Max settings is not attainable on my 8700k+2080ti. 1800p/60/Max settings is though
Yes, improves the upscaling from lower resolutions to reduce blur when the sub-native resolution doesn't scale to your display's resolution by an integer factor.
I'm really curious to play this on my C9. It'll never run at 4k or even 1800p on my rig (6700k, 1080), but I'm hoping for 1440p60 with a mix of medium and high settings. Is that looking possible?
Maybe I'll end up playing at 1080p if it comes to that, played Control that way and it looked ok with the Nvida Sharpening filter.
I'll probably wait for the reviews tomorrow though.
Maybe I'll end up playing at 1080p if it comes to that, played Control that way and it looked ok with the Nvida Sharpening filter.
I'll probably wait for the reviews tomorrow though.
Please tell me someone has figured out a way to increase controller sensitivity. Im very surprised there isnt an option.
Last edited:
The loading screens after every death are a joke. Im waiting for nearly 30sec everytime. Playing on an ssd nvm
I'm surprised you wanna increase controller sensitivity. The camera movement speed already seems a little unwieldy. I agree though they need a sensitivity slider for controller
Lol So which member of the team made the executive decision to rename low-medium-high to medium-high-epic? Random ass nonsense decisions like this crack me up XD
"Our game is too pretty for low graphic settings!"
Only played about an hour, but they felt a bit floaty and laggy. Definitely made for a controller, which is a bummer for me. Very playable, but it even says it was designed for a controller in the setup.
There is no setting for mouse/view sensitivity which is also a bummer.
Hey peeps: I've a AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 16GB DDR4 Memory (clocked at 2666... i think) - NVIDIA RTX 2070 8GB. Anyone w/ similar rigs?
Thanks for the info. I'll make sure I have my controller ready in case it feels bad to me.
Hopefully my 3900x + 1080ti handles it well above 60fps at 1440p. Though no big deal either way as I am using a Gsync monitor.
The problem isn't really that one framerate is lower than the other, it's that the framerate itself is inconsistent. 60 fps most times but with frequent stutters here and there just feels bad. And if you dont have a variable sync display, then ANY framerate between 30 and 60 is inconsistent. 50 fps on a non-variable sync display does not mean 50 consistent frames.
Why would anyone want less than 60fps on a game like this? Especially if you don't have a vrr monitor.
It would only be useful for 1080p on a 4K screen, since that is the next lowest integer scale from 4K. You're essentially dividing each axis by 2: 3840 -> 1920, 2160 -> 1080. That way, one pixel from 1080p can perfectly occupy 4 pixels on a 4K monitor.
Without integer scaling, the 1080p image is upscaled by the GPU or monitor and has some form of interpolation applied to it which results in blur. Integer scaling ensures that no interpolation occurs, resulting in an image that looks like native 1080p on a 4K monitor.
i7 8700K @ 4.8ghz
32gb DDR-3000
RTX 2070
Running @ 1440p with a locked 60 fps at max settings. No stuttering and no drops, but I only finished the intro (first 15-20 minutes) where things were fairly linear. Will see if I get drops when I get to the first planet and things open up more.
32gb DDR-3000
RTX 2070
Running @ 1440p with a locked 60 fps at max settings. No stuttering and no drops, but I only finished the intro (first 15-20 minutes) where things were fairly linear. Will see if I get drops when I get to the first planet and things open up more.
All maxed settings, I get 45 (worst case) to about 75 (best case), usually right around high 50s / 60 FPS. I haven't tried lowering settings, really, because it's fine. Very smooth feeling on adaptive sync monitor
All this running on an HDD and ooooooold i5-2500k, with a regular old GTX 1070.
There are definitely some slight hitches entering a new area or coming out of a cutscene, but they aren't enough to interrupt the game, and they seem to be getting less frequent as I play the game more and more.
Amazing game so far also.
I think this game wants six fast cores a.k.a. Intel 8700k+
1440p - 3900x/2080Ti - 84fps: 65% GPU utilization, CPU utilization can hit 100% on some cores.
4k - 3900x/2080Ti - 65fps: 98% GPU utilization
Disabling SMT, while a bad idea generally could produce performance improvements in this specific game.
Haha, my LS is throwing a shadow.
Thanks for the tip, but I don't want to constantly have to reboot and activate/deactivate it based on the use case. I'm downsampling from 4k down to 1440p and getting 60-75fps currently. Fine with me.
Thanks for the tip, but I don't want to constantly have to reboot and activate/deactivate it based on the use case. I'm downsampling from 4k down to 1440p and getting 60-75fps currently. Fine with me.
I've recently replayed Jedi Academy. And we've come a long way from a graphics pov.
2003 vs 2019
2003 vs 2019
OP
OP
Nah, just an outdated link. I've updated it. Thanks for the heads-up. :)
You don't need to do anything. The Steam version unlocks worldwide at 5am GMT/8am GMT (the countdown timer on the front of the store is different to the one on the game's store page, so one of them has to be incorrect).
Been playing around with the settings, so far I'm getting nearly locked 60fps. 1800x + RTX 2080 Super.
Custom resolution of 3200x1800.
Custom settings
Motion Blur: Off
Chromatic Abberation: Off
VSync: On
Dynamic Res Scaling: Off
ViewDistance: High
Shadow Quality: Med
Anti-Aliasing: Med
Texture Quality: High
Visual Effects: High
Post Processing: Med
Custom resolution of 3200x1800.
Custom settings
Motion Blur: Off
Chromatic Abberation: Off
VSync: On
Dynamic Res Scaling: Off
ViewDistance: High
Shadow Quality: Med
Anti-Aliasing: Med
Texture Quality: High
Visual Effects: High
Post Processing: Med
CPU: 9900K 8 Cores at 5GHz No AVX adjustment
RAM: Gigabyte Aorus 16GB 3200MHz CL16 Overclocked to 3400MHz (for now)
Motherboard: Z390 Gigabyte Aorus Ultra
Cooler: Corsair H115i RGB Pro AIO
GPU: GTX 1660ti (until Nvidia releases 3080ti)
Monitor: lg 34uc79g-b 34" 144Hz Ultrawide
Tower: Corsair 680x Crystal RGB
HD: Samsung 4TB SSD QVO, 1TB SSD 850 EVO, 500GB SSD 840 EVO, 3TB Seagate 7200rpm drive.
Only played the intro bits, but runs at about 65-75 FPS on average at 2560x1440, and higher in cutscenes (black bars on sides).
I imagine some later levels may stress the game more but shall see.
All on Epic settings.
RAM: Gigabyte Aorus 16GB 3200MHz CL16 Overclocked to 3400MHz (for now)
Motherboard: Z390 Gigabyte Aorus Ultra
Cooler: Corsair H115i RGB Pro AIO
GPU: GTX 1660ti (until Nvidia releases 3080ti)
Monitor: lg 34uc79g-b 34" 144Hz Ultrawide
Tower: Corsair 680x Crystal RGB
HD: Samsung 4TB SSD QVO, 1TB SSD 850 EVO, 500GB SSD 840 EVO, 3TB Seagate 7200rpm drive.
Only played the intro bits, but runs at about 65-75 FPS on average at 2560x1440, and higher in cutscenes (black bars on sides).
I imagine some later levels may stress the game more but shall see.
All on Epic settings.