Yeah. Sorry. I love Star Trek and I have fully enjoyed season 1 and 2, but a third time of Michael saving the universe is a bit much.
When I read comments like this its like people aren't paying attention to what they're watching. Michael is the lead (we're in season 3 and people are going to have to finally get used to this cause it's not going to stop until the show ends) and plays a big part but she's hardly the only person contributing to saving the day in the end. Even when she's super important to a situation she's at times not the one controlling the shots. It's no different from any of the other main characters in the past shows. As much as some like to say there were no singular main characters in past Trek shows there were. Kirk, Picard, Sisko, Janeway, and Archer were all the main characters and significantly large parts of the series and seasons focused on them and their actions and stories drove the shows forward. They were all responsible for saving the universe, Federation, etc time after time and ended up being super important. It's kinda annoying to see Michael singled out in this regard.
I think we should once again we wait until the show is airing to get the proper context for what is being said in a trailer. Trailers that for the last two seasons have not at all told the full story and were even misleading.