I have no idea but it makes me laugh
lol you guys i just quickly wrote the thread. I meant more like mandated by Sony but thanks for the lols
That doesn't seem to the case now though since Dauntless has crossplay chat and isn't a fps.I believe Microsoft policies are holding up a port to xbox and are specifically the reason for it not to be on the xbox. Nintendo policies might hold it back but I doubt it will ever be on switch because of the power difference.
Interesting. I struggle to imagine what policy Nintendo might have preventing FFXIV and not DQX?
Isn't this gif technically a spoiler? You betrayed the law. 😂
Ditto. Shona Robison's gonna be rightly ragin' at Square for this gross negligence.I'm writing to my local MSP right now, OP. I've got your back.
haha yep, that and the door comically flying off the hinges
Again it's been microsoft blocking it since the beginning and they still are. I don't get why people are running to defend microsoft and shit on Sony when Sony has nothing to do with this and hasn't since the beginning even with the issues with sony crossplay on other games.That doesn't seem to the case now though since Dauntless has crossplay chat and isn't a fps.
Interesting. I struggle to imagine what policy Nintendo might have preventing FFXIV and not DQX?
I think the general theory is that Microsoft wants to allow for the option of no crossplay, and Square doesn't.That doesn't seem to the case now though since Dauntless has crossplay chat and isn't a fps.
Interesting. I struggle to imagine what policy Nintendo might have preventing FFXIV and not DQX?
nteresting. I struggle to imagine what policy Nintendo might have preventing FFXIV and not DQX?
I think the general theory is that Microsoft wants to allow for the option of no crossplay, and Square doesn't.
Imagine police rocking up at a studio.
I don't think that's the case anymore. Minecraft IIRC, doesn't even make it optional.
The last comment from Square was some bs about crosschat being the reason, so that's where we are, all of their previous reasons have been dealt with afaik.
A few have said this already but it's likely hardware limitations. FFXIV may not seem like a super demanding game, but it's an MMO and there are often hundreds of characters in a zone at once. PS4 can really struggle in city zones.Interesting. I struggle to imagine what policy Nintendo might have preventing FFXIV and not DQX?
General policies are indeed why this defaults to Sony. Also YoshiP's voice chat regulation appears to have been lifted now for other genres so maybe FFXIV Xbox is coming?Again it's been microsoft blocking it since the beginning and they still are. I don't get why people are running to defend microsoft and shit on Sony when Sony has nothing to do with this and hasn't since the beginning even with the issues with sony crossplay on other games.
That used to be an issue but isn't now. There are crossplay Xbox games without opt out now (like Sea of Thieves).I think the general theory is that Microsoft wants to allow for the option of no crossplay, and Square doesn't.
GPDWin2 runs everything before Shadowbringers playably at least, don't know about SB itself as I've seen no testing. And generally as a rule anything GPWin2 can run Switch can run too, often better. The stated reason I'm aware of for dropping PS3 (256MB main RAM) also shouldn't be an issue for Switch (4GB main RAM). A streaming client is also a regional option in Asia. I'm curious, has YoshiP ever indicated performance as a reason Switch hasn't gotten FFXIV?