If this was amateur or youth sport, I agree. That's disrespectful.
As far as professional and especially elite sport goes, I think this is ridiculous.
As far as professional and especially elite sport goes, I think this is ridiculous.
I am probably ignorant since I don't watch baseball, but for some reason I am okay with this grand slam but not okay with Tom Brady throwing 65 yard passes to Randy Moss when they're up 30 points with 3 minutes to go. It just feels way more egregious in the NFL, partially because there's another option (running the ball) that they can rely on.
What are you supposed to do - not win so much? Make another team feel better by letting them come back? Use stupid time-wasting techniques or play bench scrubs? That seems even more insulting.You don't run up the score on another team in any sport. It's not a rule, it's just showing a virtue of sportsmanship (not sure the non-gender version of that, sportspersonship?)
You don't run up the score on another team in any sport. It's not a rule, it's just showing a virtue of sportsmanship (not sure the non-gender version of that, sportspersonship?)
This too. When these unwritten rules regarding bat flipping, swinging on 3-0, etc. come up, 95% of the time it is a Latino player who has committed the "infraction" and white dudes who are pissed about it.I think this is largely racism, but not exclusively. Unwritten rules in baseball have been around forever and remain dumb.
It's a stupid "rule" and an even worse idea. I think it's considerably worse for the winning team to just "give up" because they know you don't have a chance at victory, so they just pitty you and play around with you. It's patronizing & degrading. "Hey, we know you suck, so we intentionally held back & goofed around to because we're so good and you're so bad it didn't even matter."
Hit those homers, kid.
You don't run up the score on another team in any sport. It's not a rule, it's just showing a virtue of sportsmanship (not sure the non-gender version of that, sportspersonship?)
"Guy who hit a grand slam did not help his team" is a WILD take lmaoThe player's own manager is pissed because whether or not you like unwritten rules, what Tatis did did not help his team
The player's own manager is pissed because whether or not you like unwritten rules, what Tatis did did not help his team, and there's a possibility he gets plunked next time he comes up to bat, which could possibly take him out of the lineup. That's why his own manager wasn't happy.
Footballers/Soccer players don't seem to care in general and I absolutely love the game for it.
There is the respect for the opponent, but teams will not hesitate to keep scoring.
I think this is largely racism, but not exclusively. Unwritten rules in baseball have been around forever and remain dumb.
I can understand why the batter's team would be annoyed at their own player swinging at a 3-0 pitch with the bases loaded. I have no idea why the opposing team's pitchers would be mad about it.For non-baseball fans, it's the fact that he swung on a 3-0 pitch that is the issue. If the count had literally been anything different, nobody would have cared. This breaks a couple of unwritten rules, one based on sportsmanship and the other on game tactics. Running up the score has always been the most/least egregious unwritten rule broken because it feels like disrespect but everyone knows the point of the game is to score points so actually most players can wash that one off. Swinging at a 3-0 pitch against a wild pitcher is actually more objectionable to the team that did it. It's more likely that you would walk in a run for doing nothing and get an rbi than it would be to hit a grand slam. So essentially you are pissing off the other team's pitchers (the ones who have the best way to retaliate against you) and not really getting anything other than stats out of the deal.
i laughed and then cried :(
Aren't athletes paid money to perform? That home run and 4 rbis count towards his stats so he could earn a bigger pay day when he a free agent. Why wouldn't i try and pad my stats.
He almost certainly didn't have a green light to swing on a 3-0 pitch in that situation, so he will probably be fined internally.Unless he was being purposefully walked, he did nothing wrong.
He almost certainly didn't have a green light to swing on a 3-0 pitch in that situation, so he will probably be fined internally.
For non-baseball fans, it's the fact that he swung on a 3-0 pitch that is the issue. If the count had literally been anything different, nobody would have cared. This breaks a couple of unwritten rules, one based on sportsmanship and the other on game tactics. Running up the score has always been the most/least egregious unwritten rule broken because it feels like disrespect but everyone knows the point of the game is to score points so actually most players can wash that one off. Swinging at a 3-0 pitch against a wild pitcher is actually more objectionable to the team that did it. It's more likely that you would walk in a run for doing nothing and get an rbi than it would be to hit a grand slam. So essentially you are pissing off the other team's pitchers (the ones who have the best way to retaliate against you) and not really getting anything other than stats out of the deal.
The player's own manager is pissed because whether or not you like unwritten rules, what Tatis did did not help his team, and there's a possibility he gets plunked next time he comes up to bat, which could possibly take him out of the lineup. That's why his own manager wasn't happy.
Yup. I'm not sure on Tatis' contract, but most players have milestones in their contracts. So if they hit X homers, they receive a payday. Or if they drive in Y runs, or they pitch Z innings, etc.
No one likes getting embarrassed but don't mind being on the other end of itThe Rangers won a game 30-3 once. Their crying over this is laughable
What? No! Git gud.You don't run up the score on another team in any sport. It's not a rule, it's just showing a virtue of sportsmanship (not sure the non-gender version of that, sportspersonship?)
Ah yes, using violence to protect fragile egos. That's the true meaning of sportsmanship.It's just a way for players to govern the game. The unwritten rules were more important when players were allowed to self police. If you swung at 3-0 pitch with a comfortable lead then the next batter got hit. There aren't even that many of them.
Thats actually not allowed in baseball contracts. They can offer performance bonuses based on playing time (number of games played/innings pitched) but not on actual achievement (homeruns hit, strikeouts, wins, ect...)
Not all forms of "running up the score" are equal, across sports and even within sports.
There is no clock in baseball. Batters have to come to the plate. Now, if he was trying to steal a base or bunt to get on base, then I could see this criticism.
But the man simply hit a meatball that was foolishly thrown at him. Is he supposed to strike out on purpose just because his team is ahead at that point? If so, at what point should you simply stop trying in a baseball game - 5 runs? 6 runs? 7? Teams have come back from those deficits before.
Miss me with the idiotic "run up the score" takes
They might as well just bring in a mercy rule if you're not supposed to score any more runs.Not all forms of "running up the score" are equal, across sports and even within sports.
There is no clock in baseball. Batters have to come to the plate. Now, if he was trying to steal a base or bunt to get on base, then I could see this criticism.
But the man simply hit a meatball that was foolishly thrown at him. Is he supposed to strike out on purpose just because his team is ahead at that point? If so, at what point should you simply stop trying in a baseball game - 5 runs? 6 runs? 7? Teams have come back from those deficits before.
Miss me with the idiotic "run up the score" takes