• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Megasoum

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,568
Man that was fucking incredible! I had a thought for Dr von Braun during that launch and how amazed he would be to see that!
 

MrKlaw

Member
Oct 25, 2017
33,059
Why do they always end the stream before letting us know about the drone Ship Landings? Surely they'd know pretty quickly if it was a success, even if we can't get pictures straight away?
 

FliX

Master of the Reality Stone
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
9,875
Metro Detroit
That was gorgeous, goosebumps all over, can you imagine seeing that amount of detail back in the days of Apollo et al.?
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,957
It looks like the centre core was lost :( but thats to be expected given it's technically a new vehicle with all the reinforcement they had to do to it.
 

Deleted member 6733

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,441
That was incredible! Shame we didn't see the core booster land - something must have gone wrong. That shouldn't take away from the succcess though!

Seeing that Roadster in space was surreal.
 

Tygre

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,115
Chesire, UK
From the Live thread:
nniAIzp.gif
 

Futureman

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,404
what's the big deal about this? That the rocket was much larger than what has been launched in the past?
 

bsigg

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,556
what's the big deal about this? That the rocket was much larger than what has been launched in the past?

It is the largest rocket ever launched by SpaceX. Both the over priced Space Launch System (SLS) from NASA and the BFR from SpaceX will be even larger. SpaceX has the cost down to ~$90 million a launch for the Falcon Heavy however versus the estimated $1 billion for the SLS. It's a huge day for commercial spaceflight.

ILL11L5.jpg
 

Deleted member 2507

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,188
what's the big deal about this? That the rocket was much larger than what has been launched in the past?
It is the largest rocket operating since Saturn V (well, there was the Russian Energia but that was canned). So, yeah.
Also, the Falcon Heavy is kind of "off the shelf" tech, it is three Falcon 9s bolted together kinda. Which means it is also very cheap for the amount of stuff it can take to Earth orbit.
 

Futureman

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,404
LOL $90 million vs $1 billion.

is it expected that NASA is going to scrap the SLS or are there reasons to keep a government run rocket?

how does the SLS compare to Falcon Heavy? Can SLS do things FH can't?
 

Megasoum

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,568
It is the largest rocket ever launched by SpaceX. Both the over priced Space Launch System (SLS) from NASA and the BFR from SpaceX will be even larger. SpaceX has the cost down to ~$90 million a launch for the Falcon Heavy however versus the estimated $1 billion for the SLS. It's a huge day for commercial spaceflight.

ILL11L5.jpg
Saturn V is still the biggest payload but yeah, FH is a huge deal!
 

Deleted member 2507

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,188
LOL $90 million vs $1 billion.

is it expected that NASA is going to scrap the SLS or are there reasons to keep a government run rocket?

how does the SLS compare to Falcon Heavy? Can SLS do things FH can't?
Apparently SLS is intended to be human-rated. Falcon Heavy isn't strictly speaking.

The SLS is ULA's rocket, so canning it could damage ULA companies (Boeing and Lockheed).

No FH won't get certified. BFR is going to be the vehicle they use in the 2020's.
Wouldn't it make sense to can the SLS and use some of those funds to certify the Falcon Heavy until BFR is operational? SLS will still take time to get up and running and SpaceX has plans for space tourism with the Falcon Heavy as it is.
 

bsigg

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,556
LOL $90 million vs $1 billion.

is it expected that NASA is going to scrap the SLS or are there reasons to keep a government run rocket?

how does the SLS compare to Falcon Heavy? Can SLS do things FH can't?

Go through and read this article from the Verge.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/2/1...y-rocket-launch-impact-nasa-deep-space-travel

The SLS is stupidly behind schedule and overpriced. There's speculation that today's successful launch could catapult SpaceX to the forefront for manned missions for a while.
 

Maven

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,076
Earth
https://www./proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F3oEdvcZjZ7dgUjAhBS%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=ad73855f274f0deee62d0a4c2b3b50f2
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,307
Texas
Apparently SLS is intended to be human-rated. Falcon Heavy isn't strictly speaking.

The SLS is ULA's rocket, so canning it could damage ULA companies (Boeing and Lockheed).


Wouldn't it make sense to can the SLS and use some of those funds to certify the Falcon Heavy until BFR is operational? SLS will still take time to get up and running and SpaceX has plans for space tourism with the Falcon Heavy as it is.

No because SpaceX has limited resources as a private company. They need to focus on one or the other.
 

RecRoulette

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,044
Gutted that I didn't get home from work in time to see it live, but catching that replay. Fucking majestic man.
 

RabbidPeach

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
913
England
Just got around to watching the launch.

I really can't stand the football match-style atmosphere. I feel like I'm watching frat boys launching a beer keg off a garage roof.
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,957
RECOMMENDED:

Watch the replay of the launch but use the Countdown Net Audio camera view. Gwynne and mission control losing their minds: