I kinda wish Jackpot had been MJ. Would've been neatFucking Jackpot.
I don't even know what the point of that character in the comics was. She was introduced as this like not!MJ superhero, or something, after OMD and then just disappeared.
I don't know how real this is... but I saw this.
I doubt most of these will get made. Maybe like 2 or 3 before they go crawling back to Disney.
13.a. SPE Creative and Business Control Over Productions. SPE shall have total creative and business control, in its sole discretion, over all matters relating to each Production and the development, production, creative content, marketing, distribution and other exploitation thereof, including without limitation total creative control and discretion regarding the depiction of the Property (and all elements thereof) in each such Production and in all marketing, advertising and promotional materials for each Production (and Marvel shall have no rights of approval or control with respect to any of the foregoing), except for (i) SPE's Character Integrity Obligations with respect to Core Elements under Section 13.c(ii) hereof, (ii) the $75 million minimum production budget requirement with respect to Pictures under Section 13.e(i) below, (iii) the 2000 screen requirement with respect to Pictures under Section 13.f below, and (iv) the PG-13 (or equivalent) rating requirement under Section 13.e(ii).
13.e. Production Specifications. Each Picture produced and completed by SPE shall conform to the following production specifications:
13.e(i) The all-in, above-the-line and below-the-line production budget of the Picture shall be not less than $75,000,000.
13.e(ii) The Picture shall qualify for an MPAA rating no more restrictive than PG-13 (or the equivalent thereof if such rating no longer exists).
I know this is fanart but Carnage with white teeth and a Venom tongue bugs me so much. I hate it. Sony won't goof up this design aspect of him, right?
Huh. Where did you get that from?They legally cannot. The contract specifies the movies have to be PG-13 or lower. Disney/Marvel would have to approve an "R" rated movie from the license if Sony wants to go that route.
Venom's design was pretty good. Possibly the only good thing about the movie, so they might get Carnage right
The contract is readily available for people to read?That's from the 2011 amended contract between Marvel Characters, Inc. and Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.
Cool. Link to thread if you could please?
Lol a Madame Web movie? What, is she going to sit in a chair for 2 hours?
Ah, yes, the amazing writers of Dracula Untold.
Handling... fuckin Madame Fucking Web.
this is the fucking worst
For all to read!!!
"I'm so glad Sony took the rights back. You're all just overreacting!"
Lol
Jackpot is legit only on the table because she looks like Mary Jane, I'd bet. That one isn't likely.
Night watch? Maybe. They'd be better off adapting a successor to Prowler imo.
"Sony has just as good a chance of building a cinematic universe as anyone. They proved with Venom they can make films without Feige.""The Sony that was trying to do an Aunt May movie is gone now that Pascal is gone, they have learned from ASM"
"The Sony that was trying to do an Aunt May movie is gone now that Pascal is gone, they have learned from ASM"
Oh god. They wouldn't make Zendaya do a Jackpot movie...right?
These make even less sense than a Madame Web movie. There's nothing to really pull from with Jackpot and the main part of her character was the mystery with her identity, which wouldn't work in a solo movie.HAHAHAHA Jackpot and Nightwatch? Good thing Sony doesn't have the X-Man license or they'd most likely make a Adam X movie.
Jackpot is a completely different character. She was created right after Marvel broke up Peter and MJ and wanted to create a bunch of new characters. She was basically just a thing to have people wonder if she was Mary Jane during a time where she wasn't present in the book. Just making Zendaya play her wouldn't really work unless they are just using the name.Oh god. They wouldn't make Zendaya do a Jackpot movie...right?
To be fair this IS a step up front ASM :P
I hadn't thought about that... Actually that would be one of the better ideas for adapting flipping Jackpot. XD
Jackpot is a completely different character. She was created right after Marvel broke up Peter and MJ and wanted to create a bunch of new characters. She was basically just a thing to have people wonder if she was Mary Jane during a time where she wasn't present in the book. Just making Zendaya play her wouldn't really work unless they are just using the name.
You see, MJ actually taking a vigilante name to help Spidey and having some wacky hijinks ensue would be nice.
An entire freaking movie of MJ asking us to take that seriously? LOL
Pretty confident this is all they're going to do.
I won't be surprised if Sony decides to do a "Harem" for Spider-Man with Jackpot, Silver Sable and Black Cat because "Millenials are really big on this show called Sword Art Online"
Just baffles me they have some of the best rogues gallery and this is what they do with it?
I would really like to know how they convince themself that a madame Web solo film has a billion dollars audience.
In Sony Pictures investor presentation (in the spring), they listed for upcoming SUMC films:Honestly I'm not expecting half of these to make it to film. I bet that a lot of these are just script commissions atm. Ignoring the to be wonderful animated stuff, and the shoe ins like Venom, Spidey 3-4, Morbius — I really only think that Kraven, Black Cat, Silk, and Madam Web are anywhere approach solid bets atm.
I honestly doubt that Madam Webb makes it. The name by itself is horrid.
"I'm so glad Sony took the rights back. You're all just overreacting!"
Lol
Where are all those know it alls now? Why aren't they posting in this thread? I wonder what could have changed?
Basically a plot device/exposition dump character.
Coolest thing about her is she was voiced by Stan Lee's wife in the cartoon