That's the term I would have used, had it come to mind.
The incentives is 4k 60fps hdr no loading etc etc. There's value in playing at best setting like how some people consider waiting to play tlou2 on ps5.
Sarcasm? I really cant tell anymore.
For real, it always seems some MS related reply or tweet pops up after every Sony announcement. Happened after Unreal 5 demo as well. They do a shit job at hyping up their own console and try to ride the coattail of their rivals lol.
Hope they show the design asap so you can change your avatar, the shittiest and laziest concept I've seen lol, it's just a PS4 Slim.
Just to be sure we're going with scumbag sony instead of arrogant right? Man i was hoping for something catchy, Like the soony thing.
Not only that but also Switch Switch Lite Xbox One X and PS4 itself will be on the market when PS5 releases.
What kind of design are you hoping for or expecting?
100x this.
Purchasers are not being mislead and have been given a choice well in advance, so there won't be a surprise. They can buy it late next year if they want. Not forcing others to upgrade during the initial launch of next gen machines is considerate to millions of existing consumers.
I'm just happy Ray Tracing has it's foot in the door. It's the ultimate solution for visual (and audio) realism and the fact it is available on mainstream devices is the big first step. It's going to be many years before all these custom graphics rendering "tricks" get totally replaced by raytracing, but at least we have started down that path.
Well this was a completely different situation as MS caused the whole uproar all by themselves. While it's a jab at MS, this gif is still completely in good spirit, while Greenberg just comes off as very passive-aggressive. I don't like his approach at all and as a marketing guy, he should at least even try to have some likability. This kind of "look, I can't say this outright but trust me, our console is definitely better than competition's" kind of marketing probably isn't going to connect with a lot of people.Sarcasm? I really cant tell anymore.
I guess it's mainly because they don't want people paying for Game Pass to feel left out, as their first party content is just starting to really come out and their first-party just probably isn't ready for the full transition yet as most of them are fairly fresh acquisitions and probably have had some games in development already at the time of purchase.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cn...ox-games-could-be-delayed-by-coronavirus.html
You could argue that but really there are so many open PS5 related threads on the go at the moment and Greenberg is a known buffoon.
Cuts through the bullshit.
Sarcasm? I really cant tell anymore.
From my perspective, I would say the difference between this and the Microsoft comms that people have been posting is that your example is "xbox doesn't do this thing but playstation does" but the Microsoft ones come across as "that thing sony said, yeah well we do that too so don't forget about us please".Sarcasm? I really cant tell anymore.
It is kinda wild.
You would have to take into consideration differences between budget, manpower, etc... but, generally speaking, a game built for Xbox One and then ported to Xbox Series X isn't going to be on par with a game that is PS5 only.
Wow, I could not agree more, the choice of MS is great for consumers at the end of the day, I would lie saying the opposite, but it was not only taken from this point of view, it is innocence to think so. This decision (as well as Sony's) was taken a long time ago, taking into account the production of the games, XBOX's(Or PS) position in the market among other things that will never pass us by. Just as Sony's line of '' True next-gen experience '' is PR talk on a certain level, this line from Aaron among others is the same. These are two correct decisions for both companies, which use our experience as a justification, and I hope and think they will bear positive results for everyone.
Fantastic post.
